Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 92, Issue 5, pp 875–885

Soil microbes and plant fertilization

Mini-Review

Abstract

With respect to the adverse effects of chemical fertilization on the environment and their related expenses, especially when overused, alternative methods of fertilization have been suggested and tested. For example, the combined use of chemical fertilization with organic fertilization and/or biological fertilization is among such methods. It has been indicated that the use of organic fertilization with chemical fertilization is a suitable method of providing crop plants with adequate amount of nutrients, while environmentally and economically appropriate. In this article, the importance of soil microbes to the ecosystem is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and endophytic bacteria in providing necessary nutrients for plant growth and yield production. Such microbes are beneficial to plant growth through colonizing plant roots and inducing mechanisms by which plant growth increases. Although there has been extensive research work regarding the use of microbes as a method of fertilizing plants, it is yet a question how the efficiency of such microbial fertilization to the plant can be determined and increased. In other words, how the right combination of chemical and biological fertilization can be determined. In this article, the most recent advances regarding the effects of microbial fertilization on plant growth and yield production in their combined use with chemical fertilization are reviewed. There are also some details related to the molecular mechanisms affecting the microbial performance and how the use of biological techniques may affect the efficiency of biological fertilization.

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi Biological fertilization Endopytic bacteria Plant growth-promoting rhizobateria (PGPR) 

References

  1. Abbas-Zadeh P, Saleh-Rastin N, Asadi-Rahmani H, Khavazi K, Soltani A, Shoary-Nejati AR, Miransari M (2010) Plant growth promoting activities of fluorescent pseudomonads, isolated from the Iranian soils. Acta Physiol Plant 32:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adesemoye A, Kloepper J (2009) Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2008) Enhanced plant nutrient use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Can J Microbiol 54:876–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecol 58:921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artursson V, Jansson JK (2003) Use of bromodeoxyuridine immunocapture to identify active bacteria associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6208–6215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Artursson V, Finlay R, Jansson J (2006) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth. Environ Microbiol 8:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arzanesh MH, Alikhani HA, Khavazi K, Rahimian HA, Miransari M (2010) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth enhancement by Azospirillum spp. under drought stress. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benizri E, Amiaud B (2005) Relationship between plants and soil microbial communities in fertilized grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2055–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg G (2009) Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berg G, Smalla K (2008) Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bianciotto V, Lumini E, Lanfranco L, Minerdi D, Bonfante P, Perotto S (2000) Detection and identification of bacterial endosymbionts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi belonging to the family Gigasporaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4503–4509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Böhme L, Böhme F (2006) Soil microbiological and biochemical properties affected by plant growth and different long-term fertilization. Europ J Soil Biol 42:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonfante P (2003) Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and endobacteria: a dialog among cells and genomes. Biol Bulletin 204:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canbolat MY, Bilen S, Cakmakci R, Sahin F, Aydin A (2006) Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria and soil compaction on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, soil properties and rhizosphere microflora. Biol Fert Soils 42:350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlier E, Rovera M, Rossi J, Rosas SB (2008) Improvement of growth, under field conditions, of wheat inoculated with Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca SR1. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:2653–2658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chebotar VK, Makarova NM, Shaposhnikov AI, Kravchenko LV (2009) Antifungal and phytostimulating characteristics of Bacillus subtilis Ch-13 rhizospheric strain, producer of bioprepations. Appl Biochem Microbiol 45:419–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng W, Johnson DW (1998) Elevated CO2, rhizosphere processes, and soil organic matter decomposition. Plant Soil 202:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choi O, Kim J, Kim J-G, Jeong Y, Moon J, Park C, Hwang I (2008) Pyrroloquinoline quinone is a plant growth promotion factor produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens B161. Plant Physiol 146:657–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Compant S, van der Heijden M, Sessitsch A (2010) Climate change effects on beneficial plant microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:197–214Google Scholar
  20. Cruz A, Hamel C, Hanson K, Selles F, Zentner R (2009) Thirty-seven years of soil nitrogen and phosphorus fertility management shapes the structure and function of the soil microbial community in a Brown Chernozem. Plant Soil 315:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daei G, Ardakani M, Rejali F, Teimuri S, Miransari M (2009) Alleviation of salinity stress on wheat yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under field conditions. J Plant Physiol 166:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elcoka E, Kantar F, Sahin F (2008) Influence of nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the nodulation, plant growth, and yield of chickpea. J Plant Nutr 31:157–171Google Scholar
  23. Emmerling C, Schloter M, Hartmann A, Kandeler E (2002) Functional diversity of soils organisms—a review of recent research activities in Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:408–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flessa H, Ruser R, Dörsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez MA, Munch JC, Beese F (2002) Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agric Ecosys Environ 91:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George T, Gregory P, Hocking P, Richardson A (2008) Variation in root associated phosphatase activities in wheat contributes to the utilization of organic P substrates in vitro, but does not explain differences in the P-nutrition when grown in soils. Environ Exp Bot 64:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant–bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gryndler M (2000) Interactions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with other soil organisms. In: Kapulnik Y, Douds DDJ (eds) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp 239–262Google Scholar
  29. Haas D, Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Rev Microbiol 3:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Han H, Lee K (2005) Physiological responses of soybean-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum with PGPR in saline soil conditions. Res J Agric Biol Sci 1:216–221Google Scholar
  31. Harrier LA (2001) The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: a molecular review of the fungal dimension. J Exp Bot 52:469–478Google Scholar
  32. He K, Nukada H, Urakami T, Murphy MP (2003) Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ): implications for its function in biological system. Biochem Pharmacol 65:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hildebrandt U, Janetta K, Bothe H (2002) Towards growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi independent of a plant host. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1919–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter HA (2001) An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature 413:297–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jalili F, Khavazi K, Pazira E, Nejati A, Asadi Rahmani H, Rasuli Sadaghiani H, Miransari M (2009) Isolation and characterization of ACC deaminase producing fluorescent pseudomonads, to alleviate salinity stress on canola (Brassica napus L.) growth. J Plant Physiol 166:667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuiper I, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2001) Selection of a plant-bacterium pair as a novel tool for rhizostimulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14:1197–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: a beneficial plantmicrobe interaction. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 17:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuklinsky-Sobral J, Araújo WL, Mendes R, Geraldi IO, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL (2004) Isolation and characterization of soybean-associated bacteria and their potential for plant growth promotion. Environ Microbiol 6:1244–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumazawa T, Sato K, Seno H, Ishii A, Suzuki O (1995) Levels of pyrroloquinoline quinone in various foods. Biochem J 307:331–333Google Scholar
  40. Liao M, Hocking P, Dong B, Delhaize E, Richardson A, Ryan P (2008) Variation in early phosphorus-uptake efficiency among wheat genotypes grown on two contrasting Australian soils. Aust J Agric Res 59:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lugtenberg BJJ, Bloemberg GV (2004) Life in the rhizosphere. In: Ramos JL (ed) Pseudomonas, vol 1. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  42. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luo S, Wan Y, Xiao X, Guo H, Chen L, Xi Q, Zeng G, Liu C, Chen J (2011) Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacterium LRE07 from cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and its potential for remediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:1637–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lynch J (2005) Root architecture and nutrient acquisition. In: BassiriRad H (ed) Nutrient acquisition by plants: an ecological perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ma J, Li XL, Xu H, Han Y, Cai ZC, Yagi K (2007) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and wheat straw application on CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy rice field. Aust J Soil Res 45:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martinez-Romero E, Wang ET (2000) Sesbania herbacea–Rhizobium huautlense nodulation in flooded soils and comparative characterization of S. herbaces nodulating rhizobia in different environments. Microb Ecol 41:25–32Google Scholar
  47. Miller S, Liu J, Allan D, Menzhuber C, Fedorova M, Vance C (2001) Molecular control of acid phosphatase secretion into the rhizosphere of proteoid roots from phosphorus-stressed white lupin. Plant Physiol 127:594–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miransari M (ed) (2011a) Soil nutrients. Nova, New York. ISBN 978-1-61324-785-3Google Scholar
  49. Miransari M (2011b) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:917–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miransari M, Mackenzie AF (2010) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain N uptake as affected by soil total and mineral N, for the determination of optimum N fertilizer rates for wheat production. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1644–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miransari M, Mackenzie AF (2011a) Development of a soil N-test for fertilizer requirements for corn (Zea mays L.) production in Quebec. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:50–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miransari M, Mackenzie AF (2011b) Development of a soil N test for fertilizer requirements for wheat. J Plant Nutr 34:762–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miransari M, Smith DL (2007) Overcoming the stressful effects of salinity and acidity on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] nodulation and yields using signal molecule genistein under field conditions. J Plant Nutr 30:1967–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miransari M, Smith DL (2008) Using signal molecule genistein to alleviate the stress of suboptimal root zone temperature on soybean-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis under different soil textures. J Plant Interact 3:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miransari M, Smith D (2009) Alleviating salt stress on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)-Bradyrhizobium japonicum symbiosis, using signal molecule genistein. Europ J Soil Biol 45:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakouti MJ, Torabi H (2007) Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on corn (Zea mays L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2014–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakouti MJ (2008) Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miransari M, Rejali F, Bahrami HA, Malakouti MJ (2009a) Effects of soil compaction and arbuscular mycorrhiza on corn (Zea mays L.) nutrient uptake. Soil Till Res 103:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miransari M, Rejali F, Bahrami HA, Malakouti MJ (2009b) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza, soil sterilization, and soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) nutrients uptake. Soil Till Res 104:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nicol GW, Glover A, Prosser JI (2003) The impact of grassland management on archaeal community structure in upland pasture rhizosphere. Environ Microbiol 5:152–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (2001) The rhizosphere as a site of biochemical interactions among soil components, plants, and microorganisms. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (eds) The rhizosphere. Mercel Dekker, New York, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  62. Principe A, Alvarez F, Castro M, Zachi L, Fischer S, Mori G, Jofr E (2007) Biocontrol and PGPR features in native strains isolated from saline soils of Argentina. Curr Microbiol 55:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Qin S, Xing K, Jiang J-H, Xu L-H, Li WJ (2011) Biodiversity, bioactive natural products and biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic actinobacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Quideau SA, Chadwick OA, Benesi A, Graham RC, Anderson MA (2001) A direct link between forest vegetation type and soil organic matter composition. Geoderma 104:41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (1998) Life in grasses: diazotrophic endophytes. Trends Microbiol 6:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Richardson A, Peter A, Hocking P, Simpson R, George T (2009) Plant mechanisms to optimise access to soil phosphorus. Crop Pasture Sci 60:124–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rillig MC, Mummey DL (2006) Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol 171:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rovira AD (1959) Root excretions in relation to the rhizosphere effect. IV. Influence of plant species, age of plant, light, temperature, and calcium nutrition on exudation. Plant Soil 11:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ryu C-M, Farag MA, Hu C-H, Reddy MS, Wei HX, Pare PW, Kloepper JW (2003) Bacterial volatiles emissions promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100:4927–4932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Salimpour S, Khavazi K, Nadian H, Besharati H, Miransari M (2010) Enhancing phosphorous availability to canola (Brassica napus L.) using P solubilizing and sulfur oxidizing bacteria. Aust J Crop Sci 4:330–334Google Scholar
  71. Sasaki T, Yamomoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn S, Ryan P, Delhaize E, Matsumoyo H (2004) A wheat gene encoding an aluminium-activated malate transporter. Plant J 37:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shaharoona B, Naveed M, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2008) Fertilizer-dependent efficiency of Pseudomonads for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stites TE, Mitchell AE, Rucker RB (2000) Physiological importance of quinoenzymes and the O-quinone family of cofactors. J Nutr 130:719–727Google Scholar
  74. Sziderics A, Rasche F, Trognitz F, Sessitsch A, Wilhelm E (2007) Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.). Can J Microbiol 53:1195–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tanaka Y, Yano K (2005) Nitrogen delivery to maize via mycorrhizal hyphae depends on the form of N supplied. Plant Cell Environ 28:1247–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Toljander JF, Artursson V, Paul LR, Jansson JK, Finlay RD (2006) Attachment of different soil bacteria to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal extraradical hyphae is determined by hyphal vitality and fungal species. FEMS Microbiol Letters 254:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ton J, de Vos M, Robben C, Buchala A, Métraux J, van Loon L, Pieterse C (2002) Characterization of Arabidopsis enhanced disease susceptibility mutants that are affected in systemically induced resistance. Plant J 29:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Verhagen B, Bas W, Verhagen W, Glazebrook J, Zhu T, Chang H, van Loon L, Pieterse C (2003) The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microb Interact 17:895–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vessey KV (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertlizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Warembourg FR, Estelrich HD (2001) Plant phenology and soil fertility effects on below-ground carbon allocation for an annual (Bromus madritensis) and a perennial (Bromus erectus) grass species. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1291–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wouterlood M, Cawthray G, Scanlon T, Lambers H, Veneklaas E (2004a) Carboxylate concentrations in the rhizosphere of lateral roots of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) increase during plant development, but are not correlated with phosphorus status of soil or plants. New Phytol 162:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wouterlood M, Cawthray G, Turner S, Lambers H, Veneklaas E (2004b) Rhizosphere carboxylate concentrations of chickpea are affected by genotype and soil type. Plant Soil 261:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yang J, Kloepper J, Ryu C (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trend Plant Sci 14:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zabihi HR, Savaghebi GR, Khavazi K, Ganjali A, Miransari M (2010) Pseudomonas bacteria and phosphorous fertilization, affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and P uptake under greenhouse and field conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 33:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil Science, College of Agricultural SciencesShahed UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations