Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 92, Issue 2, pp 283–294 | Cite as

Species and material considerations in the formation and development of microalgal biofilms

Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering

Abstract

The development of microalgal biofilms has received very limited study despite its relevance in the design of photobioreactors where film growth may be advantageous for biomass separation or disadvantageous in fouling surfaces. Here, the effects of species selection, species control, and substrate properties on biofilms of Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella vulgaris were investigated. Experiments were conducted in batch culture and in continuous culture modes in a flow cell. Cell growth was monitored using confocal laser scanning microscopy and gravimetrically. Species selection and species control had significant effects on biofilm development. On non-sterile wastewater, C. vulgaris shifted from primarily planktonic (23.7% attachment) to primarily sessile (79.8% attachment) growth. The biofilms that developed in non-sterile conditions were thicker (52 ± 19 μm) than those grown in sterile conditions (7 ± 6 μm). By contrast, S. obliquus attained similar thicknesses (54 ± 31 and 53 ± 38 μm) in both sterile and non-sterile conditions. Neither species was able to dominate a non-sterile biofilm. The effect of substrate surface properties was minimal. Both species grew films of similar thickness (∼30 μm for S. obliquus, <10 μm for C. vulgaris) on materials ranging from hydrophilic (glass) to hydrophobic (polytetrafluoroethylene). Surface roughness created by micropatterning the surface with 10 μm grooves did not translate into long-term increases in biofilm thickness. The results indicate that species selection and control are more important than surface properties in the development of microalgal biofilms.

Keywords

Microalgae Photobioreactor Biofilm Flow cell Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) 

References

  1. Adey WH, Loveland K (1991) Dynamic aquaria: building living ecosystems. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  2. Augspurger C, Karwautz C, Mußmann M, Daims H, Battin TJ (2010) Drivers of bacterial colonization patterns in stream biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barberousse H, Brayner R, Botelho Do Rego A, Castaing J, Beurdeley-Saudou P, Colombet J (2007) Adhesion of facade coating colonisers, as mediated by physico-chemical properties. Biofouling 23:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker K (1996) Exopolysaccharide production and attachment strength of bacteria and diatoms on substrates with different surface tensions. Microb Ecol 32:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besemer K, Singer G, Limberger R, Chlup AK, Hochedlinger G, Hodl I, Baranyi C, Battin TJ (2007) Biophysical controls on community succession in stream biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4966–4974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borowitzka MA (1999) Commercial production of microalgae: ponds, tanks, tubes and fermenters. J Biotechnol 70:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae, a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14:557–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callow ME (2000) Algal biofilms. In: Evans LV (ed) Biofilms: recent advances in their study and control. Harwood Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costerton JW (ed) (2007) The biofilm primer. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Craggs RJ, Adey WH, Jenson KR, St John MS, Green FB, Oswald WJ (1996) Phosphorus removal from wastewater using an algal turf scrubber. Water Sci Technol 33:191–198Google Scholar
  12. Davis L, Hoffmann JP, Cook PW (1990) Seasonal succession of algal periphyton from a wastewater treatment facility. J Phycol 26:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Genzer J, Efimenko K (2006) Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review. Biofouling 22(5):339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert ES, Keasling JD (2004) Bench scale flow cell for nondestructive imaging of biofilms. In: Spencer JFT, de Spencer AL Ragout (eds) Environmental microbiology: methods and protocols. Humana, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gudin C, Therpenier C (1986) Bioconversion of solar energy into organic chemicals by microalgae. Adv Biotechnol Process 6:73–110Google Scholar
  16. Hench LL, Ethridge EC (1982) Biomaterials: an interfacial approach. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersboll BK, Molin S (2000) Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiol 146:2395–2407Google Scholar
  18. Johnson MB, Wen Z (2010) Development of an attached microalgal growth system for biofuel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kebede-Westhead E, Pizarro C, Mulbry WW (2003) Production and nutrient removal by periphyton grown under different loading rates of anaerobically digested flushed dairy manure. J Phycol 39:1275–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kessler E (1991) Scenedesmus: problems of a highly variable genus of green algae. Bot Acta 104:169–171Google Scholar
  21. Lappin-Scott HM, Costerton JW (eds) (1995) Microbial biofilms. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Latour RA (2004) Biomaterials: protein–surface interactions. In: Bowlin GL, Wnek G (eds) Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE (1991) Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol 173:6558–6567Google Scholar
  24. Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Wolfaardt GM, Caldwell DE (1995) Behavioral strategies of surface-colonizing bacteria. Adv Microb Ecol 14:1–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morais MG, Costa JAV (2007) Biofixation of carbon dioxide by Spirulina sp. and Scenedesmus obliquus cultivated in a three-stage serial tubular photobioreactor. J Biotechnol 129:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munoz R, Kollner C, Guieysse B (2009) Biofilm photobioreactors for the treatment of industrial wastewaters. J Hazard Mater 161:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray MD (1986) Investigation into the wettability of poly(methylmethacrylate) in vivo. J Dent 14(1):29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nichols HW, Bold HC (1965) Trichosarcina polymorpha gen. et sp. nov. J Phycol 1:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norman JJ, Desai TA (2006) Methods for the fabrication of nanoscale topography for tissue engineering scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng 34:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oswald WJ (2003) My sixty years in applied algology. J Phycol 15:99–106Google Scholar
  31. Pohlon E, Marxsen J, Kusel K (2009) Pioneering bacterial and algal communities and potential extracellular enzyme activities of stream biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pulz O, Gross W (2004) Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:635–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richmond A (ed) (2004) Handbook of microalgal culture. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Rindi F, Guiry MD (2004) Composition and spatial variability of terrestrial algal assemblages occurring at the bases of urban walls in Europe. Phycologia 43:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schenk P, Thomas-Hall S, Stephens E, Marx U, Mussgnug J, Posten C, Kruse O, Hankamer B (2008) Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Bioenergy Res 1(1):20–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schumacher G, Sekoulov I (2002) Polishing of secondary effluent by an algal biofilm process. Water Sci Technol 46(8):83–90Google Scholar
  37. Sekar R, Venugopalan VP, Satpathy KK, Nair KVK, Rao VNR (2004a) Laboratory studies on adhesion of microalgae to hard substrates. Hydrobiologia 512:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sekar R, Venugopalan VP, Nandakumar K, Nair KVK, Rao VNR (2004b) Early stages of biofilm succession in a lentic freshwater environment. Hydrobiologia 512:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P (1998) A look back at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program—biodiesel from algae. National Renewable Energy Laboratory—Report NREL/TP-580-24190.Google Scholar
  40. Shi J, Podola B, Melkonian M (2007) Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater using microalgae immobilized on twin layers: an experimental study. J Appl Phycol 19:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stephens E, Ross IL, King Z, Mussgnug JH, Kruse O, Posten C, Borowitzka MA, Hankamer B (2010) An economic and technical evaluation of microalgal biofuels. Nat Biotechnol 28(2):126–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang EPY (1995) The allometry of algal growth rates. J Plankton Res 17:1325–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Townsin RL (2003) The ship hull fouling penalty. Biofouling 19(Suppl):9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Travieso L, Pellon A, Benitez F, Sanchez E, Borja R, O’Farrill N, Weiland P (2002) BIOALGA reactor: preliminary studies for heavy metals removal. Biochem Eng J 12:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolfaardt GM, Lawrence JR, Robarts RD, Caldwell SJ, Caldwell E (1994) Multicellular organization in a degradative biofilm community. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(2):434–446Google Scholar
  46. Yasuda T, Okuno T, Yasuno H (1994) Contact angle of water on polymer substances. Langmuir 10(7):2435–2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zippel B, Rijstenbil J, Neu TR (2007) A flow-lane incubator for studying freshwater and marine phototrophic biofilms. J Microbiol Methods 70:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations