Biodegradation of sulfamethoxazole by individual and mixed bacteria
- 1.2k Downloads
Antibiotic compounds, like sulfamethoxazole (SMX), have become a concern in the aquatic environment due to the potential development of antibacterial resistances. Due to excretion and disposal, SMX has been frequently detected in wastewaters and surface waters. SMX removal in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) ranges from 0% to 90%, and there are opposing results regarding its biodegradability at lab scale. The objective of this research was to determine the ability of pure cultures of individual and mixed consortia of bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Rhodococcus equi, Rhodococcus erythropolis, Rhodococcus rhodocrous, and Rhodococcus zopfii) known to exist in WWTP activated sludge to remove SMX. Results showed that R. equi alone had the greatest ability to remove SMX leading to 29% removal (with glucose) and the formation of a metabolite. Degradation pathways and metabolite structures have been proposed based on the potential enzymes produced by R. equi. When R. equi was mixed with other microorganisms, a positive synergistic effect was not observed and the maximum SMX removal achieved was 5%. This indicates that pure culture results cannot be extrapolated to mixed culture conditions, and the methodology developed here to study the biodegradability of compounds under controlled mixed culture conditions offers an alternative to conventional studies using pure bacterial cultures or inocula from activated sludge sources consisting of unknown and variable microbial populations.
KeywordsSulfamethoxazole (SMX) Antibiotics Biodegradation R. equi Mixed cultures
This work was funded by the McGill Engineering Doctoral Award (MEDA), The J.W. McConnell Foundation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and Health Canada.
- BRENDA The Comprehensive Enzyme Information System http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/index.php4. Accessed 27 Feb 2011
- Cavallucci S (2007) Top 200: what's topping the charts in prescription drugs this year? Pharmacy Practice, Canadian Healthcare Network. http://www.imshealthcanada.com/vgn/images/portal/cit_40000873/13/31/8286270612-TOP200-07-final.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2008
- Daughton CG (ed) (2003) Chemicals from pharmaceuticals and personal care products, vol 1. Water: sciences and issues. MacMillan Reference, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Göbel A, McArdell CS, Joss A, Siegrist H, Giger W (2007) Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. Sci Total Environ 372(2–3):361–371Google Scholar
- Peng X, Wang Z, Kuang W, Tan J, Li K (2006) A preliminary study on the occurrence and behavior of sulfonamides, ofloxacin and chloramphenicol antimicrobials in wastewaters of two sewage treatment plants in Guangzhou, China. Sci Total Environ 371(1–3):314–322Google Scholar
- Ternes T, Janex-Habibi M-L, Knacker T, Kreuzinger N, Siegrist H (2006) Assessment of technologies for the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in sewage and drinking water facilities to improve the indirect potable water reuse (POSEIDON Final Report-EU Research Programme) http://poseidon.bafg.de/servlet/is/2888/. Accessed 1 Feb 2008
- Yargeau V, Lopata A, Metcalfe C (2007) Pharmaceuticals in the Yamaska River, Quebec, Canada. Water Qual Res J Can 42(4):231–239Google Scholar