Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 90, Issue 3, pp 885–893 | Cite as

Improved p-hydroxybenzoate production by engineered Pseudomonas putida S12 by using a mixed-substrate feeding strategy

  • Jean-Paul Meijnen
  • Suzanne Verhoef
  • Ashwin A. Briedjlal
  • Johannes H. de Winde
  • Harald J. Ruijssenaars
Open Access
Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering


The key precursors for p-hydroxybenzoate production by engineered Pseudomonas putida S12 are phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P), for which the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway is an important source. Since PP pathway fluxes are typically low in pseudomonads, E4P and PEP availability is a likely bottleneck for aromatics production which may be alleviated by stimulating PP pathway fluxes via co-feeding of pentoses in addition to glucose or glycerol. As P. putida S12 lacks the natural ability to utilize xylose, the xylose isomerase pathway from E. coli was introduced into the p-hydroxybenzoate producing strain P. putida S12palB2. The initially inefficient xylose utilization was improved by evolutionary selection after which the p-hydroxybenzoate production was evaluated. Even without xylose-co-feeding, p-hydroxybenzoate production was improved in the evolved xylose-utilizing strain, which may indicate an intrinsically elevated PP pathway activity. Xylose co-feeding further improved the p-hydroxybenzoate yield when co-fed with either glucose or glycerol, up to 16.3 Cmol% (0.1 g p-hydroxybenzoate/g substrate). The yield improvements were most pronounced with glycerol, which probably related to the availability of the PEP precursor glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP). Thus, it was demonstrated that the production of aromatics such as p-hydroxybenzoate can be improved by co-feeding different carbon sources via different and partially artificial pathways. Moreover, this approach opens new perspectives for the efficient production of (fine) chemicals from renewable feedstocks such as lignocellulose that typically has a high content of both glucose and xylose and (crude) glycerol.


Pseudomonas putida S12 Aromatics Mixed substrate feeding Glucose Xylose 


Pseudomonas putida S12 is a solvent-tolerant bacterium that has been developed as a platform host for the production of a range of substituted aromatic compounds such as phenol, t-cinnamate, p-coumarate, p-hydroxybenzoate, and p-hydroxy-styrene (Nijkamp et al. 2005; Nijkamp et al. 2007; Verhoef et al. 2007; Verhoef et al. 2009; Wierckx et al. 2005). Its solvent tolerance properties enable P. putida S12 to produce these toxic hydrophobic compounds to high titres without provoking harmful effects (de Bont 1998). Furthermore, in situ product extraction can be applied in fermentations by adding a second phase of a water-immiscible solvent, preventing the accumulation of product to concentrations that are inhibitory even to solvent-tolerant microorganisms (Heipieper et al. 2007; Verhoef et al. 2009).

The production of aromatic compounds by engineered P. putida S12 is based on the conversion of endogenously formed tyrosine or phenylalanine. The key precursors of these aromatic amino acids are phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) (Fig. 1). PEP is produced in the lower glycolysis from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP). GAP is formed from glucose, either via the Entner–Doudoroff pathway or via the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway, whereas E4P is derived exclusively from the PP pathway. In view of the typically low activity of the PP pathway in P. putida (del Castillo et al. 2007; Fuhrer et al. 2005; Wierckx et al. 2009), the availability of E4P and PEP may present a bottleneck for efficient aromatics production. Increasing the availability of E4P and PEP was therefore expected to enhance the production of aromatic compounds by engineered P. putida S12, as previously demonstrated for the pre-aromatic compounds chorismate and shikimate in Escherichia coli (Martinez et al. 2008).
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the biosynthetic pathways for p-hydroxybenzoate production from glycerol, glucose, and xylose. The scheme shows only the relevant routes. Heterologous genes are indicated in italics and underlined. Xylose isomerase (xylA); xylulokinase (xylB); phenylalanine/tyrosine ammonia lyase (pal/tal). Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P); fructose-6-phosphate (F6P); fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (F1,6BP); triose-3-phosphate (T3P); phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP); pyruvate (PYR); glycerol-3-phosphate (Gly3P); ribulose-5-phosphate (RU5P); xylulose-5-phosphate (Xu5P); ribose-5-phosphate (R5P); glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP); sedoheptulose-7-phosphate (S7P); erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P); 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP); chorismate (CHO); phenylalanine (PHE); cinnamate (CIN); tyrosine (TYR); p-coumarate (COUM); 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate degradation pathway (HD pathway); protocatechuate degradation pathway (PD Pathway)

The availability of PEP and E4P may be improved by stimulating PP pathway fluxes through pentose (co-)feeding, as was demonstrated previously in E. coli (Gonzalez et al. 2002). Unfortunately, this strategy cannot be applied to P. putida S12 as this strain lacks the natural ability to utilize pentoses. However, in previous work, we successfully introduced xylose utilization, via the xylose isomerase and PP pathway, into wild-type P. putida S12 (Meijnen et al. 2008). In the present study, a similar approach was employed to introduce xylose catabolism into P. putida S12palB2. This P. putida S12-derived strain produces p-hydroxybenzoate, which was selected as a model value-added aromatic compound derived from the aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway (Verhoef et al. 2010). The effect of xylose co-feeding on p-hydroxybenzoate production was assessed using glucose as the primary carbon source, mimicking lignocellulosic hydrolysate that typically contains high levels of both glucose and xylose. Alternatively, glycerol was employed as primary carbon source, being a good source for PEP as well as being a model for raw glycerol waste from biodiesel production.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The media used were Luria broth (LB) (Sambrook et al. 1982) and a phosphate-buffered minimal medium (MM; (Verhoef et al. 2010)). In minimal media, 12 mM of xylose (MMX), 10 mM of glucose (MMG), or 20 mM of glycerol (MMGly) was used as sole carbon source, unless stated otherwise. Antibiotics were added as required to the media to the following final concentrations: gentamicin, 10 μg ml−1 (MM) or 25 μg ml−1 (LB); tetracycline, 10 μg ml−1 (E. coli), 40 μg ml−1 (P. putida S12 in MM) or 60 μg ml−1 (P. putida S12 in LB). In view of the photosensitivity of tetracycline, amber bottles and light tight fermentors were employed for culturing. The expression of an additional copy of the native aroF-1 gene (Wierckx et al. 2005) as well as the expression of the xylAB_FGH genes from E. coli (both under the control of the nagAa promoter) were induced by addition of 0.1 mM of sodium salicylate.
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid




P. putida S12

Wild type, ATCC 700801

(Hartmans et al. 1990)

P. putida S12B2

pobA and hpd knockout strain with an enhanced flux towards tyrosine

(Verhoef et al. 2010)

P. putida S12palB2

P. putida S12B2 containing plasmid pJT'Tpal

(Verhoef et al. 2010)

P. putida S12B6

gcd knockout strain derived from P. putida S12B2

This study

P. putida S12palB6

P. putida S12B6 containing plasmid pBT'Tpal

This study

P. putida S12xylB6

P. putida S12B6 containing plasmid pJNTxylAB_FGH

This study

P. putida S12xylB7

P. putida S12xylB6 evolved to efficient xylose utilizer

This study

P. putida S12pal_xylB7

P. putida S12xylB7 containing plasmid pBT'Tpal

This study

Escherichia coli DH5α

supE44 ΔlacU169 (φ80 lacZΔM15) hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1




Apr, Gmr, basic expression vector for Ptac and tac RBS controlled expression

(Verhoef et al. 2010)


Apr, Gmr; basic expression vector containing the salicylate-inducable promoter nagAa and tac RBS

(Meijnen et al. 2008)


pJNTmcs(t) containing the xylAB_FGH genes from E. coli DH5α

(Meijnen et al. 2008)


Tcr; basic expression vector for Ptac and tac RBS controlled expression

This study


pBT'Tmcs containing the pal gene from R. toruloides

This study


P15A ori sacB RP4 Gmr(pBluescriptSK); suicide vector

(Quandt and Hynes 1993)


Gmr Tcr, pJQ200SK containing a loxP–tetA–loxP interrupted copy of the gcd gene

This study

aApr, Gmr and Tcr, ampicillin, gentamicin, and tetracycline resistance, respectively

Batch experiments were performed in boston bottles containing 20 ml of minimal medium in a horizontally shaking incubator at 30°C. Cultures were inoculated to a starting optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1 with cells precultured on MM with xylose, glucose, or glycerol, depending on the carbon source to be used.

Carbon-limited chemostat cultivations were performed as described previously (Verhoef et al. 2007) in 1 l fermentors with a BioFlo110 controller (New Brunswick Scientific) using MM containing different mixtures of glycerol and xylose or glucose and xylose (total carbon (C) concentration, 60 C mM), 10 μg ml−1 gentamicin, 40 μg ml−1 tetracycline, and 0.1 mM sodium salicylate. Chemostats were inoculated with a 35-ml inoculum of a late-log phase preculture on MMX. For chemostat cultivations on xylose as sole carbon source, the dilution rate (D) was set at 0.05 h−1 since wash-out occurred at higher dilution rates. For glycerol–xylose mixtures, the D was initially set to 0.05 h−1. When steady state was reached, the cultures were sampled and D was increased to 0.1 h−1. Upon reaching steady state at D = 0.1 h−1, the cultures were sampled again. For glucose–xylose mixtures, the D was set at 0.1 h−1. The cultures were considered to be at steady state when no significant changes were measured in cell density, stirring speed, and p-hydroxybenzoate concentration after at least five volume changes at the corresponding D.

Analytical methods

Optical densities were measured at 600 nm (OD600) using an Ultrospec Cell Density Meter (GE Healthcare). An optical density of 1.0 corresponds to a cell dry weight (CDW) of 0.49 g l−1. p-Hydroxybenzoate was analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1100 system) using a Zorbax 3.5 μm SB-C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm) and a diode-array detector set at 254 nm. As the eluent, a linear gradient of acetonitrile in KH2PO4-buffer (50 mM, pH 2, 1% acetonitrile) was used, increasing from 0% to 25% in 4.9 min at a flow of 1.5 ml min−1. Glucose, xylose, and glycerol were analyzed with a Dionex ICS3000 system as described previously (Meijnen et al. 2008; Verhoef et al. 2010).

DNA techniques

Genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGEN). PCR reactions were performed with Accuprime Pfx polymerase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmid DNA was isolated with the QIAprep spin miniprep kit (QIAGEN). DNA concentrations were measured with the ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop). Agarose-trapped DNA fragments were isolated with the QIAEXII gel extraction kit (QIAGEN). Plasmid DNA was introduced into electrocompetent cells using a Gene Pulser electroporation device (BioRad). DNA sequencing reactions were performed by Eurofins MWG Operon (Ebersberg, Germany).

Construction of expression plasmids

For constructing plasmid pBT'Tmcs (Tcr) the tac expression cassette and chloramphenicol (Cm) marker of pJT'Tmcs (Verhoef et al. 2010) were amplified by PCR using primers 1 and 2 (Table 2). The resulting PCR product was digested with Kpn2I and XmaJI (restriction sites present in the amplified fragment) and consequently ligated in a Kpn2IXbaI (compatible with XmaJI) digested pBBR1mcs vector, yielding pBT'Tmcs (Cmr). The Cm marker was replaced by a tetracycline (Tc) marker, which was obtained by PCR using primers 3 and 4 (Table 2) on vector pTO1 (Kieboom and de Bont 2001) and cloned into the PagI and NcoI restriction sites of pBT'Tmcs (Cmr), yielding pBT'Tmcs (Tcr).
Table 2

Oligonucleotide primers used in this study




Primer 1


Replicon of pJT’Tmcs

Primer 2


End of CmR marker

Primer 3


Start of TcR marker

Primer 4


End of TcR marker

Primer 5


Start of xylA from E. coli, KpnI

Primer 6


End of xylB from E. coli, NotI

Primer 7


Start of xylF from E. coli, NheI

Primer 8


End of xylH from E. coli, SfiI

aThe restriction sites used for cloning are underlined

For constructing pBT'Tpal, the pal gene from pJTTpal (Verhoef et al. 2007) was obtained as a KpnI–NotI fragment and purified from agarose gel. The purified fragment was ligated into KpnI–NotI-digested pBT'Tmcs, yielding pBT'Tpal.

Expression vector pJNTxylAB_FGH was constructed by cloning xylAB and xylFGH in vector pJNTmcs (Meijnen et al. 2008). The genes were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from E. coli DH5α as the template and oligonucleotide primers 5–8 (Table 2). The resulting fragments were ligated into vector pJNTmcs using the restriction sites KpnI and NotI for xylAB, and NheI and SfiI for xylFGH. The resulting plasmid was designated pJNTxylAB_FGH.

Targeted gene disruption

The gcd knockout mutant of P. putida S12B2 (Verhoef et al. 2010) was constructed in analogy to the gcd knockout mutant of wild-type P. putida S12 (Meijnen et al. 2008). The gene replacement plasmid for the gcd gene, pJQgcd::tetAloxP was constructed from the suicide vector pJQ200SK (Quandt and Hynes 1993) based on the pJQgcd::Kana vector (Meijnen et al. 2008). The loxP–kanaR–loxP fragment, encoding kanamycin resistance in vector pJQgcd::Kana was replaced by the loxP–tetA–loxP fragment (Sauer and Henderson 1988; Sternberg and Hamilton 1981), coding for tetracycline resistance, using XbaI.


Construction of a xylose-utilizing p-hydroxybenzoate-producing strain

In order to establish p-hydroxybenzoate production from xylose, the optimized base strain for p-hydroxybenzoate production, P. putida S12B2 (Table 1; (Verhoef et al. 2010)), was engineered for xylose utilization. First, the gcd gene encoding glucose dehydrogenase was disrupted in order to eliminate xylose oxidation, which makes xylose effectively unavailable for the xylose isomerase pathway (Meijnen et al. 2008). Subsequently, the xylAB_FGH genes from E. coli DH5α (encoding xylose isomerase, xylulokinase, and a high-affinity xylose transporter) were introduced. The resulting strain, P. putida S12xylB6, showed very slow growth on minimal medium with xylose as the sole carbon source, requiring 16 days to reach a cell dry weight (CDW) of 0.69 g l−1. This result was in agreement with previous findings, and evolutionary selection was performed to improve xylose utilization as described previously (Meijnen et al. 2008). After four transfers, P. putida S12xylB7 was obtained that exhibited a maximum growth rate of 0.34 h−1 on xylose and a biomass-to-substrate yield (Yxs) of 51 Cmol%.

The phenylalanine/tyrosine ammonia lyase (Pal/Tal) expression plasmid pBT'Tpal was introduced into P. putida S12xylB7 to establish p-hydroxybenzoate production, yielding strain P. putida S12pal_xylB7. Remarkably, upon introduction of pBT'Tpal, the maximum growth rate on xylose was reduced by a factor 3 compared to the plasmid-free strain, whereas the growth rate on glucose was not affected (results not shown). Still, p-hydroxybenzoate was efficiently produced from xylose in batch cultivations, at a product-to-substrate yield (Yps) of 12.4 Cmol% (Table 3). Another remarkable observation was the apparently improved p-hydroxybenzoate yield after evolutionary selection. Compared to the non-evolved strain P. putida S12palB6, the product-to-substrate yield of strain S12xyl_palB7 on glucose had increased from 14.2 to 17.4 Cmol%. On glycerol, the product-to-substrate yield improved from 15.4 to 19.3 Cmol% (data not shown, respectively, Table 3).
Table 3

Product-to-substrate yields (Yps) of P. putida S12pal_xylB7 for various culture conditions and carbon sources


Carbon source

Yps (Cmol%)

Shake flask cultivation


12.4 ± 0.51

Shake flask cultivation


17.5 ± 0.07

Shake flask cultivation


19.3 ± 0.34

Chemostat cultivationa


5.6 ± 0.11

Chemostat cultivationa


8.3 ± 0.22

Chemostat cultivationa


15.5 ± 0.14b

Chemostat cultivation


4.9 ± 0.08

Chemostat cultivation


8.1 ± 0.06

Chemostat cultivation


7.9 ± 0.20b

Chemostat cultivation


16.3 ± 0.27b

Shake flask and chemostat cultivations were performed with 60 C mM total carbon, and chemostat cultivations were operated at a dilution rate of 0.1 h−1

aAt a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1

bMaximum value obtained

Mixed-feed chemostats

In previous work on the engineered xylose-utilizing P. putida strain S12xylAB2, a diauxic shift was observed in batch cultivations on mixtures of glucose and xylose, glucose being the preferred carbon source (Meijnen et al. 2008). Obviously, the occurrence of diauxy would invalidate the concept of co-feeding two substrates simultaneously to different pathways, in order to improve the availability of two key precursors. Therefore, a chemostat cultivation setup was selected for the mixed-substrate experiments, with glucose or glycerol as the limiting nutrient. Varying amounts of xylose were used (0% to 75% of 60 mM total carbon) to replace the primary carbon source.

Although the primary carbon source was completely metabolized as expected, residual xylose was observed in the chemostat effluent. The extent to which xylose was utilized was furthermore very different for glucose and glycerol (Fig. 2). On glycerol–xylose mixtures, the amount of xylose consumed correlated well with the amount of xylose in the feed. The residual xylose observed was in the same range as in chemostat cultivations with xylose as the sole carbon source (approximately 0.27 mM). However, with glucose as the primary carbon source, the residual xylose concentrations were much higher and, furthermore, increased more than proportionally to the relative xylose concentration in the feed. Clearly, the capacity to transport and/or utilize xylose was dependent on the type of primary carbon source as well as on the relative amount of the primary carbon source in the feed.
Fig. 2

Relative xylose uptake as a function of the xylose fraction in the feed. The solid line represents the theoretical maximum uptake of xylose; the dotted lines represent the actual uptake of xylose with glycerol as co-substrate (triangles) or glucose as co-substrate (circles). Data are the average from two independent cultivations; error bars represent the maximum deviation from the mean

Production of p-hydroxybenzoate from mixtures of glucose and xylose

Chemostat cultivations with P. putida S12pal_xylB7 on glucose as single carbon source showed a product-to-substrate yield of 4.9 Cmol%, with a specific production rate of 8.0 μmol C (g CDW)−1 h−1 (Fig. 3b). The biomass yield was 42.5 Cmol% (Fig. 3a). When xylose was co-fed with glucose, the biomass-to-substrate yield slightly increased with increasing xylose concentrations (Fig. 3a). This is in agreement with the higher biomass yield observed on xylose compared to glucose (Yxs of 47.7 vs. 42.5 Cmol%, Fig. 3e, a). Moreover, the production of p-hydroxybenzoate improved significantly when xylose was co-fed with glucose. The product-to-substrate yield reached a maximum of 7.9 Cmol%, and the specific production rate increased by a factor of 1.5 to 12.0 μmol C (g CDW)−1 h−1 (Fig. 3b). These results clearly demonstrated that simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose was beneficial for p-hydroxybenzoate production. Surprisingly, the amount of xylose that was co-fed did not significantly affect Yps and qp within the range tested (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Growth and p-hydroxybenzoate production of P. putida S12pal_xylB7 in chemostat cultivations on various mixtures of carbon sources at various dilution rates (D). The biomass-to-substrate yield (Yxs), product-to-substrate yield (Yps), and product-to-biomass yield (Ypx) expressed as in Cmol biomass or product per Cmol substrate or biomass. The specific carbon uptake rate (qs) and specific p-hydroxybenzoate production rate (qp) were given in Cμmol substrate or product per gram cell dry weight (CDW) per hour. All calculated figures were corrected for the consumed amount of substrate

Production of p-hydroxybenzoate from mixtures of glycerol and xylose

In chemostats with glycerol as the sole carbon source, P. putida S12pal_xylB7 produced p-hydroxybenzoate at a yield of 8.5 Cmol%. Notably, this represents a 1.7-fold improvement over the product yield observed in glucose-grown cultures. Also in shake-flasks, an improved p-hydroxybenzoate yield on glycerol was observed (Table 3), although not as pronounced as in the chemostat cultivations. In addition to the product-to-substrate yield, also the biomass-to-substrate yield was improved 1.23-fold on glycerol (Fig. 3c). Because of the improved biomass yield, the effect of the primary substrate on the specific p-hydroxybenzoate production rate qp was limited: the qp on glycerol (8.57 μmol C (g CDW)−1 h−1) was only slightly higher than on glucose (7.96 μmol C (g CDW)−1 h−1).

The intrinsically improved p-hydroxybenzoate production from glycerol was further enhanced by xylose co-feeding. The product-to-substrate yield increased by a factor 1.9 to a maximum of 16.3 Cmol% (Fig. 3d). The qp improved along with Yps, to a maximum value of 18 μmol C (g CDW)−1 h−1. As observed for the glucose-grown chemostats, the relative amount of xylose in the feed did not affect the efficiency of p-hydroxybenzoate production from glycerol–xylose mixtures (Fig. 3d).

Production of p-hydroxybenzoate from xylose as single carbon source

In order to verify that the improved p-hydroxybenzoate production was a result of the simultaneous utilization of xylose and glucose or glycerol, and not merely of xylose utilization alone, chemostat experiments were performed with P. putida S12pal_xylB7 on xylose as single carbon source. In agreement with the reduced growth rate observed in xylose-grown batch cultures after introducing the pal/tal expression plasmid, P. putida S12pal_xylB7 washed out above a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1. Therefore, chemostats on xylose were operated at a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1. Also chemostats with a mixed glycerol–xylose feed, or glycerol as the sole carbon source, were operated at this dilution rate, as control for growth-rate effects on p-hydroxybenzoate production.

Biomass and product yields were not significantly different in chemostats operated at D = 0.05 h−1 and D = 0.1 h−1 (Fig. 3c–f), whereas the specific production and substrate uptake rates were proportional to the dilution rate as expected (Fig. 3e–f). On xylose as a single carbon source, the product-to-substrate yield (5.6 Cmol%) was 1.5-fold lower than on glycerol alone (Table 3), which result is in agreement with the product yields observed in shake flask cultures (Table 3). This demonstrates that the improved p-hydroxybenzoate production is indeed a result from co-feeding two carbon sources. Furthermore, as the product yield on mixtures of xylose and glycerol or glucose consistently exceeded the product yield on either individual carbon source (Table 3), it was concluded that co-feeding xylose to glucose or glycerol has a beneficial effect over feeding individual carbon sources for p-hydroxybenzoate production.


A mixed-substrate feeding strategy was devised to improve aromatics production by engineered P. putida S12. The approach was based on the assumption that the precursors E4P and PEP were limiting factors for aromatic biosynthesis and that their availability could be improved by stimulating the PP pathway fluxes through pentose co-feeding. A p-hydroxybenzoate producing strain, P. putida S12palB2, was selected as an aromatics-producing model system. As this strain does not have the natural ability to utilize pentoses, a xylose isomerase pathway was introduced, and the initially low growth rate on xylose was improved via an evolutionary selection procedure.

Surprisingly, tenfold less transfers were required to achieve growth characteristics similar to those of the previously evolved xylose-utilizing strain P. putida S12xylAB2 (Meijnen et al. 2008). In part, this can be attributed to the targeted disruption of gcd, since more than ten transfers had been required for strain S12xylAB2 to acquire a gcd negative phenotype. In addition to the xylose utilization efficiency, also the p-hydroxybenzoate yield was improved after the evolutionary selection. This phenomenon may be explained by the increased PP pathway activity associated with the improved xylose utilization phenotype, leading to an intrinsically improved E4P and PEP availability, independently from xylose co-feeding.

As anticipated, xylose co-feeding considerably improved the p-hydroxybenzoate yield. The increased product yield was observed with both glucose and glycerol as the primary substrate and was shown not to be caused by xylose consumption per se. Remarkably, both the product and biomass yield on glycerol were consistently higher compared to glucose, either with or without xylose co-feeding. This may be attributed to regulatory effects (e.g., carbon catabolite repression) but could also indicate that PEP availability is more critical for efficient p-hydroxybenzoate production than E4P availability. If it is assumed that pyruvate dikinase (PEP synthase) is active only under gluconeogenic conditions (Sauer and Eikmanns 2005), twice the amount of GAP (and, thus, PEP) can be obtained from glycerol compared to glucose, which is metabolized via the Entner–Doudoroff pathway in pseudomonads (del Castillo et al. 2007; Fuhrer et al. 2005). In addition, the glycerol-associated yield improvement appears to be connected to the evolutionary selection, since no such effect has been observed with the parent strains of P. putida S12pal_xylB7 (Verhoef et al. 2010). Presumably, the increased PP pathway activity associated with the efficient xylose-utilizing phenotype may allow for a more efficient equilibration of PEP and E4P levels, resulting in more efficient p-hydroxybenzoate production. It should be noted that the applied proportion of xylose in the feed showed little effect within the range tested, whether the primary substrate was glucose or glycerol. Apparently, the p-hydroxybenzoate production is not very sensitive to variations in relative xylose concentrations above a certain threshold value.

Unexpectedly, the capacity to transport and/or utilize xylose appeared to be dependent on the primary carbon source. With glycerol, a low concentration of residual xylose was observed that is presumably close to the Km of the—yet unidentified—xylose transporter in P. putida S12pal_xylB7. With glucose as the primary substrate, however, the residual xylose concentrations were higher and furthermore increased more than proportionally with increasing amounts of xylose in the feed. Although this phenomenon is still subject to further study, it may be hypothesized that xylose transport in P. putida S12pal_xylB7 is PEP dependent. This would be consistent with the observed increase in residual xylose concentrations with decreasing glucose feed (an already relatively inefficient source of PEP), the relative independency between residual xylose concentration and glycerol feed (a good source of PEP), and the decreased growth rate on xylose when Pal/Tal was introduced (drain on PEP for p-hydroxybenzoate production). In that case, replacing any PEP-dependent transport systems would be an obvious target for further strain improvement. The GAP/PEP availability may furthermore be improved by constructing an ED-negative, glycolytic P. putida S12 strain. The contribution of the (ATP-driven) E. coli xylose transporter XylFGH to xylose import was presumably limited as observed previously (Meijnen et al. 2008).

We have demonstrated that p-hydroxybenzoate production in P. putida can be considerably improved by co-feeding different carbon sources that are metabolized via different, (partly artificial) pathways. Thus, the availability of the key aromatics precursors, PEP and E4P, is improved. In addition to p-hydroxybenzoate, the production of other aromatic compounds derived from aromatic amino acids may be stimulated via this strategy. Moreover, lignocellulosic hydrolysate, the expected major feedstock for future production of biobased fuels and chemicals (Himmel and Bayer 2009; Kumar et al. 2008; Lange 2007), seems to be ideally suited for aromatics production since glucose and xylose are the predominant constituents. Also the improved production on glycerol presents an additional possibility to deploy a cheap and abundant waste substrate for biocatalytic production of (fine) chemicals.



The authors thank Karin Nijkamp for constructing the basic expression plasmids. This project is financially supported by the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs and the B-Basic partner organizations ( through B-Basic, a public-private NWO-ACTS programme (ACTS = Advanced Chemical Technologies for Sustainability). This project was co-financed by the Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation, which is part of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. de Bont JA (1998) Solvent-tolerant bacteria in biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol 16:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. del Castillo T, Ramos JL, Rodriguez-Herva JJ, Fuhrer T, Sauer U, Duque E (2007) Convergent peripheral pathways catalyze initial glucose catabolism in Pseudomonas putida: genomic and flux analysis. J Bacteriol 189:5142–5152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuhrer T, Fischer E, Sauer U (2005) Experimental identification and quantification of glucose metabolism in seven bacterial species. J Bacteriol 187:1581–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gonzalez R, Tao H, Shanmugam KT, York SW, Ingram LO (2002) Global gene expression differences associated with changes in glycolytic flux and growth rate in Escherichia coli during the fermentation of glucose and xylose. Biotechnol Prog 18:6–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hartmans S, van der Werf MJ, de Bont JA (1990) Bacterial degradation of styrene involving a novel flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent styrene monooxygenase. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1347–1351Google Scholar
  6. Heipieper HJ, Neumann G, Cornelissen S, Meinhardt F (2007) Solvent-tolerant bacteria for biotransformations in two-phase fermentation systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:961–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Himmel ME, Bayer EA (2009) Lignocellulose conversion to biofuels: current challenges, global perspectives. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:316–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kieboom J, de Bont JAM (2001) Identification and molecular characterization of an efflux system involved in Pseudomonas putida S12 multidrug resistance. Microbiology 147:43–51Google Scholar
  9. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV (2008) Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lange JP (2007) Lignocellulose conversion; an introduction to chemistry, process and economics. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 1:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinez K, de Anda R, Hernandez G, Escalante A, Gosset G, Ramirez OT, Bolivar FG (2008) Coutilization of glucose and glycerol enhances the production of aromatic compounds in an Escherichia coli strain lacking the phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase system. Microb Cell Fact 7:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meijnen JP, de Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ (2008) Engineering Pseudomonas putida S12 for efficient utilization of d-xylose and l-arabinose. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5031–5037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nijkamp K, van Luijk N, de Bont JA, Wery J (2005) The solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida S12 as host for the production of cinnamic acid from glucose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nijkamp K, Westerhof RGM, Ballerstedt H, de Bont JAM, Wery J (2007) Optimization of the solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida S12 as host for the production of p-coumarate from glucose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quandt J, Hynes MF (1993) Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in gram-negative bacteria. Gene 127:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1982) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  17. Sauer U, Eikmanns BJ (2005) The PEP-pyruvate-oxaloacetate node as the switch point for carbon flux distribution in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sauer B, Henderson N (1988) Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5166–5170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sternberg N, Hamilton D (1981) Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination. I. Recombination between loxP sites. J Mol Biol 150:467–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Verhoef S, Ruijssenaars HJ, de Bont JA, Wery J (2007) Bioproduction of p-hydroxybenzoate from renewable feedstock by solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida S12. J Biotechnol 132:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Verhoef S, Wierckx N, Westerhof RG, de Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ (2009) Bioproduction of p-hydroxystyrene from glucose by the solvent-tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas putida S12 in a two-phase water-decanol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Verhoef S, Ballerstedt H, Volkers RJ, de Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ (2010) Comparative transcriptomics and proteomics of p-hydroxybenzoate producing Pseudomonas putida S12: novel responses and implications for strain improvement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:679–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wierckx NJP, Ballerstedt H, de Bont JAM, Wery J (2005) Engineering of solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida S12 for bioproduction of phenol from glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8221–8227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wierckx N, Ruijssenaars HJ, de Winde JH, Schmid A, Blank LM (2009) Metabolic flux analysis of a phenol producing mutant of Pseudomonas putida S12: verification and complementation of hypotheses derived from transcriptomics. J Biotechnol 143:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Paul Meijnen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Suzanne Verhoef
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
  • Ashwin A. Briedjlal
    • 1
  • Johannes H. de Winde
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Harald J. Ruijssenaars
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.B-BasicDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial FermentationDelftThe Netherlands
  4. 4.BIRD Engineering BVSchiedamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Botany and MicrobiologyKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuven-HeverleeBelgium
  6. 6.GorinchemThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations