Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 89, Issue 5, pp 1645–1652 | Cite as

Comparison of biological removal via nitrite with real-time control using aerobic granular sludge and flocculent activated sludge

Environmental Biotechnology
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The process of nitrification–denitrification via nitrite for nitrogen removal under real-time control mode was tested in two laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) with flocculent activated sludge (R1) and aerobic granular sludge (R2) to compare operational performance and real-time control strategies. The results showed that the average ammonia nitrogen, total inorganic nitrogen (TIN), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal during aeration phase were 97.6%, 57.0%, and 90.1% in R2 compared with 98.6%, 48.7%, and 88.1% in R1. The TIN removed in both SBRs was partially due to the presence of simultaneous nitrification–denitrification via nitrite, especially in R2. The specific nitrification and denitrification rates in R2 were 0.0416 mgNH 4 + –N/gSS-min and 0.1889 mgNO X − –N/gSS-min, which were 1.48 times and 1.35 times that of R1. The higher rates for COD removal, nitrification, and denitrification were achieved in R2 than R1 with similar influent quality. Dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and oxidization reduction potential, corresponding to nutrient variations, were used as diagnostic parameters to control the organic carbon degradation and nitrification–denitrification via nitrite processes in both SBRs. The online control strategy of granular SBR was similar to that of the SBR with flocculent activated sludge. However, a unique U-type pattern on the DO curve in granular SBR was different from SBR with flocculent activated sludge in aerobic phase.

Keywords

Nitrification–denitrification via nitrite Aerobic granular sludge Flocculent activated sludge Real-time control SBR 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Foundation for Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of the P.R. China (FANEDD, no. 200544), and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, Ministry of Education of the P. R. China (20092302110059), Heilongjiang Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scientists (JC200909), and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Innovative Talents, Harbin City Government (2007RFLXS002).

References

  1. Adav SS, Lee DJ, Show KY, Tay JH (2008) Aerobic granular sludge: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv 26:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA-AWWA-WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Casellas M, Dagot C, Baudu M (2006) Set up and assessment of a control strategy in a SBR in order to enhance nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Process Biochem 41:1994–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassidy DP, Belia E (2005) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from an abattoir wastewater in a SBR with aerobic granular sludge. Water Res 39:4817–4823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung J, Bae W, Lee YW, Rittmann BE (2007) Shortcut biological nitrogen removal in hybrid biofilm/suspended growth reactors. Process Biochem 42:320–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Kreuk MK, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM (2005) Simutaneous COD, nitrogen and phosphate removal by aerobic granular sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 90:761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Kreuk MK, Kishida N, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Aerobic granular sludge—state of the art. Water Sci Technol 155:79–81Google Scholar
  8. Eum Y, Choi E (2002) Optimization of nitrogen removal from piggery waste by nitrite nitrification. Water Sci Technol 45:89–96Google Scholar
  9. Gao DW, Peng YZ, Liang H, Wang P (2003) Using oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and pH value for process control of shortcut nitrification–denitrification. J Environ Sci Health 38:2933–2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao DW, Peng YZ, Li BK, Liang H (2009) Shortcut nitrification–denitrification by real-time control strategies. Bioresour Technol 100:2298–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo JH, Yang Q, Peng YZ, Yang AM, Wang SY (2007) Biological nitrogen removal with real-time control using step-feed SBR technology. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:1564–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han DW, Chang JS, Kim DJ (2003) Nitrifying microbial community analysis of nitrite accumulating biofilm reactor by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Water Sci Technol 47:97–104Google Scholar
  13. Hellinga C, Schellen AAJC, Mulder JW, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1998) The SHARON process: an innovative method for nitrogen removal from ammonium-rich wastewater. Water Sci Technol 37:135–142Google Scholar
  14. Holman JB, Wareham DG (2005) COD, ammonia and dissolved oxygen time profile in the simultaneous nitrification/denitrification process. Biochem Eng J 22:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim DJ, Chang JS, Lee DI, Han DW, Yoo IK, Cha GC (2003) Nitrification of high strength ammonia wastewater and nitrite accumulation characteristics. Water Sci Technol 47:45–51Google Scholar
  16. Kim J, Chen M, Kishida N, Sudo R (2004) Integrated real-time control strategy for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater using sequencing batch reactors. Water Res 38:3340–3348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kishida N, Kim JH, Chen M, Sasaki H, Sudo R (2003) Effectiveness of oxidation-reduction potential and pH as monitoring and control parameters for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment by sequencing batch reactors. J Biosci Bioeng 96:285–290Google Scholar
  18. Kishida N, Kim JH, Tsuneda S, Sudo R (2006) Anaerobic/oxic/anoxic granular sludge process as an effective nutrient removal process utilizing denitrifying polyphasphate-accumulating organisms. Water Res 40:2303–2310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemaire R, Meyer R, Taske A, Crocetti GR, Keller J, Yuan ZG (2006) Identifying causes for N2O accumulation in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor performing simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal. J Biotech 122:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Y, Liu Y (2005) Diffusion of substrate and oxygen in aerobic granule. Biochem Eng J 27:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y, Tay JH (2004) State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22:533–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsili-Libelli S (2006) Control of SBR switching by fuzzy pattern recognition. Water Res 40:1095–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgenroth E, Sherden T, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ, Wilderer PA (1997) Aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res 31:3191–3194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mosquera-Corral A, de Kreuk MK, Heijnen JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM (2005) Effects of oxygen concentration on N-removal in an aerobic granular sludge reactor. Water Res 39:2676–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulder JW, van Loosdrecht MCM, Hellinga C, van Kempen R (2001) Full-scale application of the SHARON process for the treatment of rejection water of digested sludge dewatering. Water Sci Technol 43:127–134Google Scholar
  26. Ni BJ, Yu HQ, Sun YJ (2008) Modeling simultaneous autotrophic and heterotrophic growth in aerobic granules. Water Res 42:1583–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ni BJ, Xie WM, Liu SG, Yu HQ, Wang YZ, Wang G, Dai XL (2009) Granulation of activated sludge in a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of low-strength municipal wastewater. Water Res 43:751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng YZ, Chen Y, Peng CY, Liu M, Wang SY, Song XQ, Cui YW (2004) Nitrite accumulation by aeration controlled in sequencing batch reactors treating domestic wastewater. Water Sci Technol 50:35–43Google Scholar
  29. Rittmann BE, McCarty PL (2001) Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruiz G, Jeison D, Chamy R (2003) Nitrification with high nitrite accumulation for the treatment of wastewater with high ammonia concentration. Water Res 37:1371–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanwar P, Nandy T, Ukey P, Manekar P (2008) Correlating on-line monitoring parameters, pH, DO and ORP with nutrient removal in an intermittent cyclic process bioreactor system. Bioresour Technol 99:7630–7635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tay JH, Ivanov V, Pan S, Tay STL (2002) Specific layers in aerobically grown microbial granules. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:254–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Traoré A, Grieu S, Puig S, Corominas L, Thiery F, Polit M, Colprim J (2005) Fuzzy control of dissolved oxygen in a sequencing batch reactor pilot plant. Chem Eng J 111:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Dongen U, Jetten MSM, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2001) The SHARON-ANAMMOX process for treatment of ammonium rich wastewater. Water Sci Technol 44:53–60Google Scholar
  35. Wang F, Xia SQ, Liu Y, Chen XS, Zhang J (2007) Community analysis of ammonia and nitrite oxidizers in start-up of aerobic granular sludge reactor. J Environ Sci 19:996–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang JL, Peng YZ, Wang SY, Gao YQ (2008) Nitrogen removal by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification via nitrite in a sequence hybrid biological reactor. Chin J Chem Eng 16:778–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang XN, He JG, Jiang T (2008) Effects of aeration volume and alkalinity on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) of aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor. Abstr J Biotechnol 136S:S647–S677Google Scholar
  38. Yuan XJ, Gao DW (2010) Effect of dissolved oxygen on nitrogen removal and process control in aerobic granular sludge reactor. J Hazard Mater 178:1041–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawen Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiangjuan Yuan
    • 1
  • Hong Liang
    • 1
  • Wei-Min Wu
    • 3
  1. 1.School of ForestryNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and EnvironmentHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations