Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 791–798

Non-linear population dynamics in chemostats associated with live–dead cell cycling in Escherichia coli strain K12-MG1655

  • Ernest Chi Fru
  • Irina Dana Ofiţeru
  • Vasile Lavric
  • David W. Graham
Applied Microbial and Cell Physiology

Abstract

Bacterial populations conditionally display non-linear dynamic behaviour in bioreactors with steady inputs, which is often attributed to varying habitat conditions or shifting intracellular metabolic activity. However, mathematical modelling has predicted that such dynamics also might simply result from staggered birth, growth, and death events of groups of cells within the population, causing density oscillations and the cycling of live and dead cells within the system. To assess this prediction, laboratory experiments were performed on Escherichia coli strain K12-MG1655 grown in chemostats to first define fine-scale population dynamics over time (minutes) and then determine whether the dynamics correlate with live–dead cell cycles in the system. E. coli populations displayed consistent oscillatory behaviour in all experiments. However, close synchronisation between OD600 and live–dead cell oscillations (within ~33–38 min cycles) only became statistically significant (p < 0.01) when pseudo-steady state operations approaching carrying capacity existed in the bioreactor. Specifically, live cells were highest at local OD600 maxima and lowest at local OD600 minima, showing that oscillations followed live–dead cell cycles as predicted by the model and also consistent with recent observations that death is non-stochastic in such populations. These data show that oscillatory dynamic behaviour is intrinsic in bioreactor populations, which has implications to process operations in biotechnology.

Keywords

Bacteria Chemostats Population dynamics Cell death Carrying capacity 

References

  1. Ackermann M, Stearns SC, Jenal U (2003) Senescence in a bacterium with asymmetric division. Science 300:1920Google Scholar
  2. Baines J, Lacovara P (2002) Burial and the dead in ancient Egyptian society: respect, formalism, neglect. J Social Archaeol 2:3–5Google Scholar
  3. Berney M, Hammes F, Bosshard F, Weilenmann H-U, Egli T (2007) Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3283–3290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briones A, Raskin L (2003) Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability. Curr Opin Biotech 14:270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camazine S, Deneubourd J-L, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornejo OE, May RDE, RM LBR (2009) Oscillations in continuous culture populations of Streptococcus pneumoniae: population dynamics and the evolution of clonal suicide. Proc R Soc B 276:999–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engelberg-Kulka H, Amitai H, Kolodkin-Gal I, Hazan R (2006) Bacterial programmed cell death and multicellular behavior in bacteria. PloS GenPLoS Genet 2:e135. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham DW, Knapp CW, Van Vleck ES, Bloor K, Lane TB, Graham CE (2007) Experimental demonstration of chaotic instability in biological nitrification. ISME J 1:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirkwood TBL, Austed SN (1979) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lavric V, Graham DW (2010) Death, birth and growth as structuring operators of bacterial population dynamics. J Theor Biol 264:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis K (2000) Programmed death in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindner AB, Madden R, Demarez A, Stewart EJ, Taddei F (2008) Asymmetric segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:3076–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maisonneuve E, Ezraty B, Dukan S (2008a) Protein aggregates: aging factor involved in cell death. J Bacteriol 190:6070–6075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maisonneuve E, Fraysse L, Moinier D, Ezraty B, Dukan S (2008b) Existence of abnormal protein aggregates in healthy Escherichia coli cells. J Bacteriol 190:887–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray DB, Beckmann M, Kitano H (2007) Regulation of yeast oscillatory dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2241–2246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naganuma T (1996) Differential enumeration of intact and damaged marine planktonic bacteria based on cell membrane integrity. J Aqua Ecosyst Stress Rec 5:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nyström T (2002) Aging in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nyström T (2007) A bacterial kind of aging. PloS Gen 3:e224. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Percival DB, Walden AT (1993) Spectral analysis for physical applications: multitaper and conventional univariate techniques. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rice KC, Bayles KW (2008) Molecular control of bacterial death and lysis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72:85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rutter J, Reick M, McKnight SL (2002) Metabolism and the control of circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Biochem 71:307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Savichtcheva O, Okayama N, Ito T, Okabe S (2005) Application of a direct fluorescence-based live/dead staining combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of survival rate of Bacteroides spp. in drinking water. Biotech Bioeng 92:356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith JO (2003) Mathematics of the discrete Fourier transform. W3K Publishing, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Stephens MA (1974) EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J Am Stat Ass 69:730–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stewart E, Madden R, Paul G, Taddei F (2005) Aging and death in an organism that reproduces by morphologically symmetric division. PLoS Biol 3:e45. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang P, Robert L, Dand PJ, WL TF, Wright A, Jun S (2010) Robust growth of Escherichia coli. Curr Biol. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.045 Google Scholar
  27. Waters CM, Brassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Ann Rev Cell Develop Biol 21:319–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watve M, Parab S, Jogdand P, Keni S (2006) Aging may be a conditional strategic choice and not an inevitable outcome for bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14831–14835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winkler J, Seybert A, Konig L, Pruggnaller S, Haselmann U, Sourjik V, Frangakis SS, Mojk A, Bukaru B (2010) Quantitative and spatio-temporal features of protein aggregation in Escherichia coli and consequences on protein quality control and cell ageing. EMBO J 29:910–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Woldringh CL (2005) Is Escherichia coli getting old? BioEssays 27:770–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yarmolinsky MB (1995) Programmed cell death in bacterial populations. Science 267:836–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernest Chi Fru
    • 1
  • Irina Dana Ofiţeru
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vasile Lavric
    • 2
  • David W. Graham
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and GeosciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering DepartmentUniversity Politehnica of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations