Fermentation characteristics of Dekkera bruxellensis strains
- 511 Downloads
The influence of pH, temperature and carbon source (glucose and maltose) on growth rate and ethanol yield of Dekkera bruxellensis was investigated using a full-factorial design. Growth rate and ethanol yield were lower on maltose than on glucose. In controlled oxygen-limited batch cultivations, the ethanol yield of the different combinations varied from 0.42 to 0.45 g (g glucose)−1 and growth rates varied from 0.037 to 0.050 h−1. The effect of temperature on growth rate and ethanol yield was negligible. It was not possible to model neither growth rate nor ethanol yield from the full-factorial design, as only marginal differences were observed in the conditions tested. When comparing three D. bruxellensis strains and two industrial isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. cerevisiae grew five times faster, but the ethanol yields were 0–13% lower. The glycerol yields of S. cerevisiae strains were up to six-fold higher compared to D. bruxellensis, and the biomass yields reached only 72–84% of D. bruxellensis. Our results demonstrate that D. bruxellensis is robust to large changes in pH and temperature and may have a more energy-efficient metabolism under oxygen limitation than S. cerevisiae.
KeywordsDekkera bruxellensis Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ethanol yield Growth rate Glycerol yield Full-factorial design
This study was financed by the research programmes MicroDrive (http://microdrive.slu.se) and DOM (http://www.mistra.org/dom) at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. We are grateful to Dr. Su-Lin Leong, Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences for proofreading the manuscript.
- Aguilar Uscanga MG, Delia ML, Strehaiano P (2003) Brettanomyces bruxellensis: effect of oxygen on growth and acetic acid production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:157–162Google Scholar
- Eriksson LJE, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wikström C, Wold S (2008) Design of experiments, principles and applications. Umetrics Academy, Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden. www.umetrics.com
- Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (1998) The yeasts. A taxonomic study. Elsevier Science BV, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Liberal ATD, Basilio ACM, Resende AD, Brasileiro BTV, da Silva-Filho EA, de Morais JOF, Simões DA, Morais MA Jr (2007) Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J Appl Microbiol 102:538–547Google Scholar
- Miniac MD (1989) Contamination of industrial alcoholic fermentations by yeasts of the genus Brettanomyces. Ind Aliment Agricol 106:559–563Google Scholar
- Nielsen J, Villadsen J, Lidén G (2003) Bioreaction engineering principles. Kluwer Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA (1986) Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:199–224Google Scholar
- van Nedervelde L, Debourg A (1995) Properties of Belgian acid beers and their microflora. II. Biochemical properties of Brettanomyces yeasts. Cerevisia Biotechnol 20:43–48Google Scholar