Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 1175–1188 | Cite as

Characterization of corrosive bacterial consortia isolated from petroleum-product-transporting pipelines

  • Aruliah Rajasekar
  • Balakrishnan Anandkumar
  • Sundaram Maruthamuthu
  • Yen-Peng TingEmail author
  • Pattanathu K. S. M. Rahman
Environmental Biotechnology

Abstract

Microbiologically influenced corrosion is a problem commonly encountered in facilities in the oil and gas industries. The present study describes bacterial enumeration and identification in diesel and naphtha pipelines located in the northwest and southwest region in India, using traditional cultivation technique and 16S rDNA gene sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA sequences of the isolates was carried out, and the samples obtained from the diesel and naphtha-transporting pipelines showed the occurrence of 11 bacterial species namely Serratia marcescens ACE2, Bacillus subtilis AR12, Bacillus cereus ACE4, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AI1, Klebsiella oxytoca ACP, Pseudomonas stutzeri AP2, Bacillus litoralis AN1, Bacillus sp., Bacillus pumilus AR2, Bacillus carboniphilus AR3, and Bacillus megaterium AR4. Sulfate-reducing bacteria were not detected in samples from both pipelines. The dominant bacterial species identified in the petroleum pipeline samples were B. cereus and S. marcescens in the diesel and naphtha pipelines, respectively. Therefore, several types of bacteria may be involved in biocorrosion arising from natural biofilms that develop in industrial facilities. In addition, localized (pitting) corrosion of the pipeline steel in the presence of the consortia was observed by scanning electron microscopy analysis. The potential role of each species in biofilm formation and steel corrosion is discussed.

Keywords

Carbon steel API 5 L-X60 Petroleum product pipeline Bacterial community 16S rDNA analysis Microbiologically influenced corrosion 

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410Google Scholar
  2. American Petroleum Institute (1959) Recommended practice 28. First ednGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidelman JG, Struhl KE (1988) Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Batista JF, Pereira RF, Lopes JM, Carvalho MF, Feio MJ, Reis MA (2000) In situ corrosion control in industrial water systems. Biodegradation 11:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beech IB, Sunner J (2004) Biocorrosion, towards understanding interactions between biofilms and metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benka-Coker MO, Metseagharun W, Ekundayo JA (1995) Abundance of sulphate-reducing bacteria in Niger Delta oilfield waters. Biores Tech 54:151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bermont-Bouis D, Janvier M, Grimont PA, Dupont I, Vallaeys T (2007) Both sulfate-reducing bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae take part in marine biocorrosion of carbon steel. J Appl Microbiol 102:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloomfield SF, Arthur M (1994) Mechanisms of inactivation and resistance of spores to chemical biocides. Soc Appl bacterial Symp Ser 23:91S–104SGoogle Scholar
  9. Bond DR, Holmes DE, Tender LM, Lovley DR (2002) Electrode-reducing microorganisms that harvest energy from marine sediments. Science 18:483–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bothe H, Jost G, Schloter M, Ward BB, Witzel K (2000) Molecular analysis of ammonia oxidation and denitrification in natural environments. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (1974) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th edn. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  12. Campanella JJ, Bitincka L, Smalley J (2003) MatGAT: an application that generates similarity/identity matrices using protein or DNA sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 4:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Critchley MM, Pasetto R, O’Halloran RJ (2004) Microbiological influences in ‘blue water’ copper corrosion. J Appl Microbiol 97:590–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cuypers H, Zumft WG (1993) Anaerobic control of denitrification in Pseudomonas stutzeri escapes mutagenesis of an fnr-like gene. J Bacteriol 175:7236–7246Google Scholar
  15. Delille D (2000) Response of Antarctic soil bacterial assemblages to contamination by diesel fuel and crude oil. Microb Ecol 40:159–168Google Scholar
  16. Drysdale GD, Kasan HC, Bux F (1999) Denitrification by heterotrophic bacteria during activated sludge treatment. Water SA 25:357–362Google Scholar
  17. Eaton A, Clesceri L, Greenberg A (1995) Standards methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Graves JW, Sullivan EH (1996) Internal corrosion in gas gathering system and transmission lines. Mater Prot 5:33–37Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton WA (1985) Sulphate-reducing bacteria and anaerobic corrosion. Annu Rev Microbiol 39:195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192Google Scholar
  21. Holt JG, Kreig NR, Sneath PHA, Stanely JT (1994) In: Williams ST (ed) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  22. Jana J, Jain AK, Sahota SK, Dhawan HC (1999) Failure analysis of oil pipelines. Bull Electrochem 15:262–265Google Scholar
  23. Jan-Roblero J, Romero JM, Amaya M, Le Borgne S (2004) Phylogenetic characterization of a corrosive consortium isolated from a sour gas pipeline. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:862–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jan-Roblero J, Posadas A, Zavala-Dıaz de la Serna FJ, Garcıa R, Hernandez-Rodrıguez C (2008) Phylogenetic characterization of bacterial consortia obtained of corroding gas pipelines in Mexico. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1775–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LeChevallier MW, Cawthon CD, Lee RG (1988) Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:649–654Google Scholar
  28. Little B, Ray R (2002) A perspective on corrosion inhibition by biofilms. Corrosion 58:424–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lloyd-Jones G, Trudgill PW (1989) The degradation of alicylic hydrocarbon by a microbial consortium. Int Bioremed 25:197–206Google Scholar
  30. Lopes FA, Morin P, Oliveira R, Melo LF (2006) Interaction of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans biofilms with stainless steel surface and its impact on bacterial metabolism. J Appl Microbiol 101:1087–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maruthamuthu S, Mohanan S, Rajasekar A, Muthukumar N, Ponmarippan S, Subramanian P, Palaniswamy N (2005) Role of corrosion inhibitors on bacterial corrosion in petroleum product pipeline. Indian J Chem Technol 12:567–575Google Scholar
  32. Miranda-Tello E, Fardeau ML, Thomas P, Fernandezb L, Ramirez F, Cayol JL, Garcia JL, Olliviera B (2003) Desulfovibrio capillatus sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from an oil field separator located in the Gulf of Mexico. Anaerobe 9:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miranda-Tello E, Bethencourt M, Botana FJ, Cano MJ, Sánchez-Amaya JM, Corzo A, García de Lomas J, Fardeau ML, Ollivier B (2006) Biocorrosion of carbon steel alloys by an hydrogenotrophic sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio capillatus isolated from a Mexican oil field separator. Corr Sci 48:2417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mora-Mentdoze JL, Pandilla-Viveros AA, Zavala-Olivares G, Gonzalez-Nuriez MA, Moreno-Serrano JL, Hernandez-Gayosso MJ, Garcia-Esquivel, Rand Galindez (2003) Corrosion NACE Paper No 03548.Google Scholar
  35. Muthukumar N, Rajasekar A, Ponmarriappan S, Mohanan S, Maruthamuthu S, Muralidharan S, Subramanian P, Palaniswamy N, Raghavan M (2003a) Microbiologically influenced corrosion in petroleum product pipelines: a review. Indian J Exp Biol 41:1012–1022Google Scholar
  36. Muthukumar N, Mohanan S, Maruthamuthu S, Subramanian P, Palaniswamy N, Raghavan M (2003b) Role of Brucella sp. and Gallionella sp. in oil degradation and corrosion. Electrochem Comm 5:422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muthukumar N, Maruthamuthu S, Palaniswamy N (2007) Role of cationic and nonionic surfactants on biocidal efficiency in diesel-water interface. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 57:152–160Google Scholar
  38. Nealson KH (1992) The manganese-oxidizing bacteria. In: Balows A, Truper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH (eds) The Prokaryotes, vol 3, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 2310–2320Google Scholar
  39. Neria-Gonzalez I, Wang ET, Ramirez F, Romero JM, Hernandez-Rodriguez C (2006) Characterization of bacterial community associated to biofilms of corroded oil pipelines from the southeast of Mexico. Anaerobe 12:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oblinger JL, Koburger JA (1975) Understanding and teaching the most probable number technique. J Milk Food Technol 38:540–545Google Scholar
  41. Obuekwe CO, Westlake DWS (1987) Occurrence of bacteria in Pembina oil pipeline system and their role in corrosion process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 26:389–393Google Scholar
  42. Pim JH (1988) Tank corrosion study, Suffolk Country, Department of Health Services, Office of Underground Storage Tanks, US EPAGoogle Scholar
  43. Pope DH, Pope RM (1998) Guide for the monitoring and treatment of microbiologically influenced corrosion in the natural gas industry. GRI report GRI-96/0488. Gas Research Institute, Des PlainesGoogle Scholar
  44. Postgate JR (1984) The sulphate reducing bacteria. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Rajasekar A, Ponmariappan S, Maruthamuthu S, Palaniswamy N (2007a) Bacterial degradation and corrosion of naphtha in transporting pipeline. Current Microbiol 55:374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rajasekar A, Ganesh Babu T, Karutha Pandian S, Maruthamuthu S, Palaniswamy N, Rajendran A (2007b) Role of Serratia marcescens ACE2 on diesel degradation and its influence on corrosion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell AD (1995) Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to biocides. Inter Biodeter Biodegrad 36:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Samant AK, Anto P (1992) Failure of pipelines in Indian offshore and remedial measures. In: Proceedings of the third National Corrosion Congress on Corrosion Control by NCCI, Karaikudi, India, p 188Google Scholar
  49. Stapleton P (1987) Sweden report, US EPA, US, T2-5-22BGoogle Scholar
  50. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Von Wolzogen Kuhr CAH, Vander Klugt Walker IS (1934) The graphitization of cat iron as an electrochemical process in anaerobic solid. Water 18:147–165Google Scholar
  52. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol 173:697–703Google Scholar
  53. Westlake DWS, Semple KM, Obuekwe CO (1986) Corrosion by ferric-iron reducing bacteria isolated from oil production systems. In: Dexter SC (ed) Biologically induced corrosion. NACE, Houston, pp 193–200Google Scholar
  54. Zhu XY, Lubeck J, Kilbane JJ (2003) Characterization of microbial communities in gas industry pipelines. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:354–5363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aruliah Rajasekar
    • 1
  • Balakrishnan Anandkumar
    • 2
  • Sundaram Maruthamuthu
    • 3
  • Yen-Peng Ting
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pattanathu K. S. M. Rahman
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologySourashtra CollegeMaduraiIndia
  3. 3.Biocorrosion Group, Corrosion Protection DivisionCentral Electrochemical Research InstituteKaraikudiIndia
  4. 4.Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering Group, School of Science and TechnologyUniversity of TeessideMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations