Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 85, Issue 6, pp 2001–2008 | Cite as

Substrate consumption and excess sludge reduction of activated sludge in the presence of uncouplers: a modeling approach

  • Wen-Ming Xie
  • Bing-Jie Ni
  • Guo-Ping Sheng
  • Han-Qing YuEmail author
  • Min Yang
Environmental Biotechnology

Abstract

A mathematical model with a consideration of energy spilling is developed to describe the activated sludge in the presence of different levels of metabolic uncouplers. The consumption of substrate and oxygen via energy spilling process is modeled with a Monod term, which is dependent on substrate and inhibitor. The sensitivity of the developed model is analyzed. Three parameters, maximum specific growth rate (μ max), energy spilling coefficient (q max), and sludge yield coefficient (Y H) are estimated with experimental data of different studies. The values of μ max, q max, and Y H are found to be 6.72 day-1, 5.52 day-1, and 0.60 mg COD mg-1 COD for 2, 4-dinitrophenol and 7.20 day-1, 1.58 day-1, and 0.62 mg COD mg-1 COD for 2, 4-dichlorophenol. Substrate degradation and sludge yield could be predicted with this model. The activated sludge process in the presence of uncouplers that is described more reasonably by the new model with a consideration of energy spilling. The effects of uncouplers on substrate consumption inhibition and excess sludge reduction in activated sludge are quantified with this model.

Keywords

Activated sludge Energy spilling Modeling Sludge yield Substrate consumption Uncoupler 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Natural Science Foundation of China (50625825 and 50738006) and the Key Special Program on the Science and Technology for the Pollution Control and Treatment of Water Bodies (2008ZX07316-002 and 2008ZX07010-005) for the partial support of this study.

References

  1. Chen GH, Mo HK, Liu Y (2002) Utilization of a metabolic uncoupler, 3, 3’, 4’, 5-tetrachilrosalicylanilide (TCS) to reduce sludge growth in activated sludge culture. Water Res 36:2077–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen GW, Yu HQ, Liu HX, Xu DQ (2006a) Response of activated sludge to the presence of 2, 4-dichlorophenol in a batch culture system. Process Biochem 41:1758–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen GW, Yu HQ, Xi PG (2006b) Influence of 2, 4-dinitrophenol on the characteristics of activated sludge in batch reactors. Bioresource Technol 98:729–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen GW, Yu HQ, Xi PG, Xu DQ (2008) Modeling the yield of activated sludge in the presence of 2, 4-dinitrophenol. Biochem Eng J 40:10-50-156Google Scholar
  5. Cook M, Russell B (1994) Energy spilling reactions of Streptococcus bovis and resistance of its membrane to proton conductance. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1942–1948Google Scholar
  6. Forrest WW (ed) (1969) Energetic aspects of microbial growth. Microbial Energetics. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Gujer W, Larsen TA (1995) The implementation of biokinetics and conservation principles in ASIM. Water Sci Technol 31:257–266Google Scholar
  8. Gujer W, Henze M, Mino T, van Loosdrecht MCM (1999) Activated sludge model no. 3. Water Sci Technol 39:183–193Google Scholar
  9. Henze M, Grady CPL Jr, Gujer W, Marais GVR, Matsuo T (1987) Activated sludge model No. 1. Scientific and Technical Report No. 1. IAWPRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht MCM (2000) Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d, and ASM3. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 9. IWA Publishing, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu Y (2003) Chemically reduced excess sludge production in the activated sludge process. Chemosphere 50:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Y, Chen GH, Rols JL (1999) A kinetic model incorporating energy spilling for substrate removal in substrate-sufficient batch culture of activated sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:647–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Low EW, Chase HA (1999) Reducing production of excess biomass during wastewater treatment. Water Res 33:1119–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitchell P, Moyle J (1965) Stoichiometry of proton translocation through the respiration chain and adenosine triphosphatase system of rat liver mitochondria. Nature 208:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moussa MS, Hooijmans CM, Lubberding HJ, Gijzen HJ, van Loosdrecht MCM (2005) Modelling nitrification, heterotrophic growth and predation in activated sludge. Water Res 39:5080–5098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reichert P, Ruchti J, Simon W (1994) Aquasim 2.0. Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), Duebendorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Saini G, Wood BD (2008) Metabolic uncoupling of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, under the influence of excess substrate and 3, 3, 4, 5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS). Biotechnol Bioeng 99:1352–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tempest W, Niejssel M (1992) Physicological and energetic aspects of bacterial metabolite overproduction. FEMS Microbiol 64:91–99Google Scholar
  19. Tsai SP, Lee YH (1990) A model for energy-sufficient culture growth. Biotechnol Bioeng 35:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-Ming Xie
    • 1
  • Bing-Jie Ni
    • 1
  • Guo-Ping Sheng
    • 1
  • Han-Qing Yu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Min Yang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations