Comparing the transcriptomes of wine yeast strains: toward understanding the interaction between environment and transcriptome during fermentation

Genomics and Proteomics


System-wide “omics” approaches have been widely applied to study a limited number of laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. More recently, industrial S. cerevisiae strains have become the target of such analyses, mainly to improve our understanding of biotechnologically relevant phenotypes that cannot be adequately studied in laboratory strains. Most of these studies have investigated single strains in a single medium. This experimental layout cannot differentiate between generally relevant molecular responses and strain- or media-specific features. Here we analyzed the transcriptomes of two phenotypically diverging wine yeast strains in two different fermentation media at three stages of wine fermentation. The data show that the intersection of transcriptome datasets from fermentations using either synthetic MS300 (simulated wine must) or real grape must (Colombard) can help to delineate relevant from “noisy” changes in gene expression in response to experimental factors such as fermentation stage and strain identity. The differences in the expression profiles of strains in the different environments also provide relevant insights into the transcriptional responses toward specific compositional features of the media. The data also suggest that MS300 is a representative environment for conducting research on wine fermentation and industrially relevant properties of wine yeast strains.


Wine Yeast Transcriptomics Fermentation Colombard MS300 


  1. Abbott DA, Knijnenburg TA, de Poorter LM, Reinders MJ, Pronk JT, van Maris AJ (2007) Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 7:819–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Askwith C, Eide D, Van Ho A, Bernard PS, Li L, Davis-Kaplan S, Sipe DM, Kaplan J (1994) The FET3 gene of S. cerevisiae encodes a multicopper oxidase required for ferrous iron uptake. Cell 76:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attfield PV (1997) Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of baker’s yeast. Nat Biotechnol 15:1351–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baichwal V, Cunningham T, Gatzek P, Kohlhaw G (1983) Leucine biosynthesis in yeast. Identification of two genes (LEU4, LEU5) that affect alpha-Isopropylmalate synthase activity and evidence that LEU1 and LEU2 gene expression is controlled by alpha-Isopropylmalate and the product of a regulatory gene. Curr Genet 7:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer FF, Pretorius IS (2000) Yeast stress response and fermentation efficiency: how to survive the making of wine—a review. S Afr J Enol 21:27–51Google Scholar
  6. Baxter SM, Rosenblum JS, Knutson S, Nelson MR, Montimurro JS, Di Gennaro JA, Speir JA, Burbaum JJ, Fetrow JS (2004) Synergistic computational and experimental proteomics approaches for more accurate detection of active serine hydrolases in yeast. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beltran G, Novo M, Leberre V, Sokol S, Labourdette D, Guillamon JM, Mas A, François J, Rozes N (2006) Integration of transcriptomic and metabolic analyses for understanding the global responses of low-temperature winemaking fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 6:1167–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bely L, Sablayrolles J, Barre P (1990) Description of alcoholic fermentation kinetics: its variability and significance. Am J Enol Vitic 40:319–324Google Scholar
  9. Ben-Dor A, Shamir R, Yakhini Z (1999) Clustering gene expression patterns. J Comp Biol 6:281–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boer VM, de Winde JH, Pronk JT, Piper MD (2003) The genome-wide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on glucose in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus or sulfur. J Biol Chem 278:3265–3274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckholz RG, Cooper TG (1991) The allantoinase (DAL1) gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 7:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casalone E, Barberio C, Cavalieri D, Polsinelli M (2000) Identification by functional analysis of the gene encoding alpha-isopropylmalate synthase II (LEU9) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16:539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caspar Hurlimann H, Stadler-Waibel M, Werner TP, Freimoser FM (2007) Pho91 is a vacuolar phosphate transporter that regulates phosphate and polyphosphate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 18:4438–4445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox KH, Tate JJ, Cooper TG (2002) Cytoplasmic compartmentation of Gln3 during nitrogen catabolite repression and the mechanism of its nuclear localization during carbon starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277:37559–37566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Boer M, Nielsen PS, Bebelman JP, Heerikhuizen H, Andersen HA, Planta RJ (2000) Stp1p, Stp2p and Abf1p are involved in regulation of expression of the amino acid transporter gene BAP3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucl Acids Res 28:974–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehmann DE, Gehring AM, Walsh CT (1999) Lysine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanism of alpha-aminoadipate reductase (Lys2) involves posttranslational phosphopantetheinylation by Lys5. Biochem 38:6171–6177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El Alami M, Messenguy F, Scherens B, Dubois E (2003) Arg82p is a bifunctional protein whose inositol polyphosphate kinase activity is essential for nitrogen and PHO gene expression but not for Mcm1p chaperoning in yeast. Mol Microbiol 49:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feller A, Ramos F, Pierard A, Dubois E (1999) In Saccharomyces cerevisae, feedback inhibition of homocitrate synthase isoenzymes by lysine modulates the activation of LYS gene expression by Lys14p. Eur J Biochem 261:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira C, van Voorst F, Martins A, Neves L, Oliveira R, Kielland-Brandt MC, Lucas C, Brandt A (2005) A member of the sugar transporter family, Stl1p is the glycerol/H+ symporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 16:2068–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friden P, Schimmel P (1987) LEU3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a factor for control of RNA levels of a group of leucine-specific genes. Mol Cell Biol 7:2708–2717Google Scholar
  21. Holst B, Lunde C, Lages F, Oliveira R, Lucas C, Kielland-Brandt MC (2000) GUP1 and its close homologue GUP2, encoding multimembrane-spanning proteins involved in active glycerol uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 37:108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Isnard AD, Thomas D, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1996) The study of methionine uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a new family of amino acid permeases. J Mol Biol 262:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ivorra C, Pérez-Ortín JE, del Olmo M (1999) An inverse correlation between stress resistance and stuck fermentations in wine yeasts. A molecular study. Biotechnol Bioeng 54:698–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones DG, Reusser U, Braus GH (1991) Molecular cloning, characterization and analysis of the regulation of the ARO2 gene, encoding chorismate synthase, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 5:2143–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kosugi A, Koizumi Y, Yanagida F, Udaka S (2001) MUP1, high affinity methionine permease, is involved in cysteine uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 65:728–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwok EY, Severance S, Kosman DJ (2006) Evidence for iron channeling in the Fet3p-Ftr1p high-affinity iron uptake complex in the yeast plasma membrane. Biochemistry 45:6317–6327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lasko PF, Brandriss MC (1981) Proline transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 148:241–247Google Scholar
  28. Lesuisse E, Simon-Casteras M, Labbe P (1998) Siderophore-mediated iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the SIT1 gene encodes a ferrioxamine B permease that belongs to the major facilitator superfamily. Microbiology 144:3455–34621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maftahi M, Nicaud JM, Levesque H, Gaillardin C (1995) Sequencing analysis of a 24.7 kb fragment of yeast chromosome XIV identifies six known genes, a new member of the hexose transporter family and ten new open reading frames. Yeast 11:1077–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JH (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Marini AM, Soussi-Boudekou S, Vissers S, Andre B (1997) A family of ammonium transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 17:4282–4293Google Scholar
  32. Marks VD, van der Merwe GK, van Vuuren HJJ (2003) Transcriptional profiling of wine yeast in fermenting grape juice: regulatory effect of diammonium phosphate. FEMS Yeast Res 3:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marks VD, Ho Sui SJ, Erasmus D, van den Merwe GK, Brumm J, Wasserman WW, Bryan J, van Vuuren HJJ (2008) Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. FEMS Yeast Res 8:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Natarajan K, Meyer MR, Jackson BM, Slade D, Roberts C, Hinnebusch AG, Marton MJ (2001) Transcriptional profiling shows that Gcn4p is a master regulator of gene expression during amino acid starvation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21:4347–4368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nikawa J, Tsukagoshi Y, Yamashita S (1991) Isolation and characterization of two distinct myo-inositol transporter genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 266:11184–11191Google Scholar
  36. Omura F, Fujita A, Miyajima K, Fukui N (2005) Engineering of yeast put4 permease and its application to lager yeast for efficient proline assimilation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:1162–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petersen JG, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nilsson-Tillgren T, Bornaes C, Holmberg S (1988) Molecular genetics of serine and threonine catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 119:527–534Google Scholar
  38. Philpott CC, Protchenko O, Kim YW, Boretsky Y, Shakoury-Elizeh M (2002) The response to iron deprivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: expression of siderophore-based systems of iron uptake. Biochem Soc Trans 30:698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Regenberg B, Holmberg S, Olsen LD, Kielland-Brandt MC (1998) Dip5p mediates high-affinity and high-capacity transport of L-glutamate and L-aspartate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 33:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Regenberg B, During-Olsen L, Kielland-Brandt MC, Holmberg S (1999) Substrate specificity and gene expression of the amino-acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 36:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B (2003) Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 20:1369–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossouw D, Naes T, Bauer FF (2008) Linking gene regulation and the exo-metabolome: a comparative transcriptomics approach to identify genes that impact on the production of volatile aroma compounds in yeast. BMC Genomics 9:530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roussouw I, Thireos G, Hauge BM (1988) Transcriptional-translational regulatory circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae which involves the GCN4 transcriptional activator and the GCN2 protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol 8:2132–2139Google Scholar
  44. Schaaff-Gerstenschlager I, Mannhaupt G, Vetter I, Zimmermann FK, Feldmann H (1993) TKL2, a second transketolase gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cloning, sequence and deletion analysis of the gene. Eur J Biochem 217:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schreve JL, Garret JM (2004) Yeast Agp2 and Agp3 function as amino acid permeases in poor nutrient conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313:645–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith FW, Hawkesford MJ, Prosser IM, Clarkson DT (1995) Isolation of a cDNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a high affinity sulphate transporter at the plasma membrane. Mol Gen Genet 247:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sophianopoulou V, Diallinas G (1993) AUA1, a gene involved in ammonia regulation of amino acid transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 8:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stolz J, Hoja U, Meier S, Sauer N, Schweizer E (1999) Identification of the plasma membrane H +-biotin symporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by rescue of a fatty acid-auxotrophic mutant. J Biol Chem 274:18741–18746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Talibi D, Grenson M, Andre B (1995) Cis- and trans-acting elements determining induction of the genes of the gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) utilization pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucl Acids Res 23:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanaka J, Fink GR (1985) The histidine permease gene (HIP1) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 38:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomas D, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1997) Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:503–532Google Scholar
  52. Thomas D, Barbey R, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1990) Gene-enzyme relationship in the sulfate assimilation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Study of the 3′-phosphoadenylylsulfate reductase structural gene. J Biol Chem 265:15518–15524Google Scholar
  53. Tusher CG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5116–5121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Varela C, Cárdenas J, Melo F, Agosin E (2005) Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions. Yeast 22:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang D, Zheng F, Holmberg S, Kohlhaw GB (1999) Yeast transcriptional regulator Leu3p. Self-masking, specificity of masking, and evidence for regulation by the intracellular level of Leu3p. J Biol Chem 274:19017–19024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilcox LJ, Balderes DA, Wharton B, Tinkelenberg AH, Rao G, Sturley SL (2002) Transcriptional profiling identifies two members of the ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily required for sterol uptake in yeast. J Biol Chem 277:32466–32472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yoo HS, Genbauffe FS, Cooper TG (1985) Identification of the ureidoglycolate hydrolase gene in the DAL gene cluster of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 5:2279–2288Google Scholar
  58. Zhou K, Brisco PR, Hinkkanen AE, Kohlhaw GB (1987) Structure of yeast regulatory gene LEU3 and evidence that LEU3 itself is under general amino acid control. Nucl Acids Res 15:5261–5273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu X, Garrett J, Schreve J, Michaeli T (1996) GNP1, the high-affinity glutamine permease of S. cerevisiae. Curr Genet 30:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Institute for Wine BiotechnologyUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations