Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Dry anaerobic ammonia–methane production from chicken manure

Abstract

The effect of temperature on production of ammonia during dry anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure (CM), inoculated with thermophilic methanogenic sludge, was investigated in a batch condition for 8 days. Incubation temperature did not have a significant effect on the production of ammonia. Almost complete inhibition of production of methane occurred at 55 and 65°C while quite low yields of 8.45 and 6.34 ml g−1 VS (volatile solids) were observed at 35 and 45°C due to a higher accumulation of ammonia. In order to improve the production of methane during dry anaerobic digestion of CM, stripping of ammonia was performed firstly on the CM previously fermented at 65°C for 8 days: the stripping for 1 day at 85°C and pH 10 removed 85.5% of ammonia. The first-batch fermentation of methane for 75 days was conducted next, using the ammonia-stripped CM inoculated with methanogenic sludge at different ratios, (CM: thermophilic sludge) of 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 on volume per volume basis at both 35 and 55°C. Production of methane improved and was higher than that of the control (without stripping of ammonia) but the yield of 20.4 ml g−1 VS was still low, so second stripping of ammonia was conducted, which resulted in 74.7% removal of ammonia. A great improvement in the production of methane of 103.5 ml g−1 VS was achieved during the second batch for 55 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Angelidaki I, Ahring BK (1994) Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: effect of temperature. Water Res 28:727–731

  2. Angelidaki I, Ahring BK (1993) Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 38:560–564

  3. APHA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

  4. Bonmati A, Flotats X (2003) Air stripping of ammonia from pig slurry: characterization and feasibility as a pre- or post-treatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Waste Manage (oxford) 23:261–272

  5. Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, Cenkowski S (2000) High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Agric Eng Res 76:51–60

  6. Converse JC, Evans GW, Robinson KL, Gibbons W (1981) Methane production from a large-size on-farm digester for poultry manure. In: Livestock waste: a renewable resource, proceedings of the fourth International Symposium on livestock wastes—1980, ASAE, Amarillo, Texas, USA 122–125

  7. Delaune PB, Moore PA, Daniel TC, Lemunyon JL (2004) Effect of chemical and microbial amendments on ammonia volatilization from composting poultry litter. J Environ Qual 33:728–734

  8. Demirci GG, Demirer GN (2004) Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Biores Technol 93:109–117

  9. Gallert C, Winter J (1997) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic waste: Effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48:405–410

  10. Ginting D, Kessavalou A, Eghball B, Doran JW (2003) Greenhouse gas emission and soil indicators four years after manure and compost applications. J Environ Qual 32:23–32

  11. Heinrichs DM, Poggi-Varaldo HM, Olieskewicz JA (1990) Effect of ammonia on anaerobic digestion of simple organic substrates. J Environ Eng 116:698–710

  12. Hill DT (1983) Simplified monod kinetics of methane fermentation of animal wastes. Agricultural Wastes 5:1–16

  13. IARC (1997) The International Agency for Research on Cancer, An arm of the World Health Organization, in February, "Priority PBTs: Dioxins and Furans," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: http://www.epa.gov/pbt/dioxins.htm

  14. Kelleher BP, Leahy JJ, Henihan AM, O’dwyer TF, Sutton D, Leahy MJ (2002) Advances in poultry litter disposal technology—a review. Biores Technol 83:27–36

  15. Koster JW, Lettinga G (1984) The influence of ammonium-nitrogen on the specific activity of pelletized methanogenic sludge. Agricultural Wastes 9:205–16

  16. Krylova NI, Khabiboulline RE, Naumova RP, Nagel MA (1997) The influence of ammonium and methods for removal during the anaerobic treatment of poultry manure. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol 70:99–105

  17. Liao PH, Chen A, Lo KV (1995) Removal of nitrogen from swine manure wastewaters by ammonia stripping. Biores Technol 54:17–20

  18. Lei X, Sugiura N, Feng C, Maekaaki T (2007) Pretreatment of anaerobic digestion effluent with ammonia stripping and biogas purification. J Hazardous Materials 145:391–397

  19. MAFF (2008) Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Development and management of livestock excreta situation (http://www.maff.go.jp/j/chikusan/kankyo/taisaku/t_mondai/02_kanri/index.html)

  20. Magbanua JBS, Adams TT, Johnston P (2001) Anaerobic co-digestion of hog and poultry waste. Biores Technol 76:165–168

  21. Morris GR, Jewell WJ, Casler GL (1975) Alternative animal waste anaerobic fermentation design and their costs. In: Proceedings of agricultural waste management conference, Cornell University, pp 317–335

  22. Nailia IK, Roustem EK, Rimma PN, Mark AN (1997) The influence of ammonium and methods for removal during the anaerobic treatment of poultry manure. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 70:99–105

  23. Nakashimada Y, Ohshima Y, Minami H, Yabu H, Namba Y, Nishio N (2008) Ammonia–methane two-stage anaerobic digestion of dehydrated waste-activated sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:1061–1069

  24. Peigne J, Girardin P (2004) Environmental impacts of farm scale composting practices. Water Air Soil Pollut 153:45–68

  25. Safely LM, Westerman PW (1992) Performance of a low temperature lagoon digester. Biores Technol 41:167–175

  26. Safely LM, Westerman PW (1994) Low-temperature digestion of dairy and swine manure. Biores Technol 47:165–171

  27. Su S, Beath A, Guo H, Mallett C (2005) An assessment of mine methane mitigation and utilisation technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 31:123–170

  28. Sung S, Liu T (2003) Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere 53:43–52

  29. Tiquia SM, Tam NFY (2002) Characterization and composting of poultry litter in forced-aeration piles. Process Biochem 37:869–880

  30. Turnell JR, Faulkner RD, Hinch GN (2007) Recent advances in Australian broiler litter utilization. World’s Poultry Science J 63:223–231

  31. Yokoyama H, Waki M, Ogino A, Ohmori H, Tanaka Y (2007) Hydrogen fermentation properties of undiluted cow dung. J Biosci Bioeng 104:82–85

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by The Iwatani Naoji Foundation’s Research Grant.

Author information

Correspondence to Yutaka Nakashimada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abouelenien, F., Kitamura, Y., Nishio, N. et al. Dry anaerobic ammonia–methane production from chicken manure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82, 757–764 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1881-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ammonia production
  • Ammonia stripping
  • Chicken manure
  • Dry fermentation
  • Methane fermentation