Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 225–233 | Cite as

Microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase producing Lactobacillus reuteri for oral targeted delivery in the gastrointestinal tract

  • Christopher Martoni
  • Jasmine Bhathena
  • Aleksandra Malgorzata Urbanska
  • Satya Prakash
Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering

Abstract

This is the first study of its kind to screen probiotic lactic acid bacteria for the purpose of microencapsulating a highly bile salt hydrolase (BSH)-active strain. A Lactobacillus reuteri strain and a Bifidobacterium longum strain were isolated as the highest BSH producers among the candidates. Microcapsules were prepared with a diameter of 619 ± 31 μm and a cell load of 5 × 109 cfu/ml. Post de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe broth-acid challenge, L. reuteri microcapsules metabolized glyco- and tauro-conjugated bile salts at rates of 10.16 ± 0.46 and 1.85 ± 0.33 μmol/g microcapsule per hour, respectively, over the first 2 h. Microencapsulated B. longum had minimal BSH activity and were significantly (P < 0.05) more susceptible to acid challenge. Further testing of L. reuteri microcapsules in a simulated human gastrointestinal (GI) model showed an improved rate, with 49.4 ± 6.21% of glyco-conjugates depleted after 60 min and complete deconjugation after 4 h. Microcapsules protected the encased cells in the simulated stomach maintaining L. reuteri viability above 109, 108, and 106 cfu/ml after 2 h at pH 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0, respectively. Results show excellent potential for this highly BSH-active microencapsulation system in vitro, highlighted by improved viability and substrate utilization in simulated GI transit.

Keywords

Microcapsule Probiotic bacteria L. reuteri Bile salt hydrolase Oral delivery Gastrointestinal tract 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants from Micropharma Limited (Montreal, Quebec) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). C.M. gratefully acknowledges a Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). J.B. gratefully acknowledges Postgraduate Scholarships from CIHR and the Canadian Liver Foundation (CLF). A.M.U. gratefully acknowledges a Postgraduate Scholarship from NSERC.

References

  1. Benno Y, Endo K, Mizutani T, Namba Y, Komori T, Mitsuoka T (1989) Comparison of fecal microflora of elderly persons in rural and urban areas of Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1100–1105Google Scholar
  2. Bullock J, Boyle J, Wang MB (2001) Physiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. De Rodas BZ, Gilliland SE, Maxwell CV (1996) Hypocholesterolemic action of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 and calcium in swine with hypercholesterolemia induced by diet. J Dairy Sci 79:2121–2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Smet I, Van Hoorde L, De Saeyer M, Vande WM, Verstraete W (1994) In vitro study of bile salt hydrolase (bsh) activity of bsh isogenic Lactobacillus plantarum 80 strains and estimation of cholesterol lowering through enhanced bsh activity. Microb Ecol Health Dis 7:315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Smet I, Van Hoorde L, Vande WM, Christiaens H, Verstraete W (1995) Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol 79:292–301Google Scholar
  6. De Smet I, De Boever P, Verstraete W (1998) Cholesterol lowering in pigs through enhanced bacterial bile salt hydrolase activity. Br J Nutr 79:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. du Toit M, Franz CMAP, Dicks LMT, Schillinger U, Haberer P, Warlies B, Ahrens F, Holzapfel WH (1998) Characterisation and selection of probiotic lactobacilli for a preliminary minipig feeding trial and their effect on serum cholesterol levels, faeces pH and faeces moisture content. Int J Food Microbiol 40:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilliland SE, Nelson CR, Maxwell C (1985) Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus-acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:377–381Google Scholar
  9. Grill JP, Cayuela C, Antoine JM, Schneider F (2000) Isolation and characterization of a Lactobacillus amylovorus mutant depleted in conjugated bile salt hydrolase activity: relation between activity and bile salt resistance. J Appl Microbiol 89:553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grunewald KK (1982) Serum-cholesterol levels in rats fed skim milk fermented by Lactobacillus-acidophilus. J Food Sci 47:2078–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gruzza M, Fons M, Ouriet MF, Duval-Iflah Y, Ducluzeau R (1994) Study of gene transfer in vitro and in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice from Lactococcus lactis strains to various strains belonging to human intestinal flora. Microb Releases 2:183–189Google Scholar
  12. Hardison WGM (1978) Hepatic taurine concentration and dietary taurine as regulators of bile-acid conjugation with taurine. Gastroenterology 75:71–75Google Scholar
  13. Hofmann AF (1989) Enterohepatic circulation of bile acids. American Physiological Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofmann AF (1999) Bile acids: the good, the bad, and the ugly. News Physiol Sci 14:24–29Google Scholar
  15. Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Snel J, Schillinger U, Huis in’t Veld JHJ (1998) Overview of gut flora and probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 41:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang Y, Adams MC (2004) In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 91:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones ML, Chen HM, Wei OY, Metz T, Prakash S (2004) Microencapsulated genetically engineered Lactobacillus plantarum 80 (pCBH1) for bile acid deconjugation and its implication in lowering cholesterol. J Biomed Biotechnol 1:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klaver FA, van der MR (1993) The assumed assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium bifidum is due to their bile salt-deconjugating activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1120–1124Google Scholar
  19. Martoni C, Bhathena J, Jones ML, Urbanska AM, Chen H, Prakash S (2007) Investigation of microencapsulated BSH active Lactobacillus in the simulated human GI tract. J Biomed Biotechnol doi:101155/2007/13684
  20. Nagengast FM, Grubben MJAL, Vanmunster IP (1995) Role of bile-acids in colorectal carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer 31A:1067–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naidu AS, Bidlack WR, Clemens RA (1999) Probiotic spectra of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 39:13–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pereira DI, Gibson GR (2002) Effects of consumption of probiotics and prebiotics on serum lipid levels in humans. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 37:259–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson R (1989) Special yoghurts—potential health benefits. Dairy Ind Int 54:23–25Google Scholar
  24. Sanders ME, in’t Veld JHI (1999) Bringing a probiotic-containing functional food to the market: microbiological, product, regulatory and labeling issues. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 76:293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scalia S (1988) Simultaneous determination of free and conjugated bile acids in human gastric juice by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 431:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shah NP (2000) Probiotic bacteria: selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods. J Dairy Sci 83:894–907Google Scholar
  27. Tahri K, Grill JP, Schneider F (1996) Bifidobacteria strain behavior toward cholesterol: coprecipitation with bile salts and assimilation. Curr Microbiol 33:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tahri K, Grill JP, Schneider F (1997) Involvement of trihydroxyconjugated bile salts in cholesterol assimilation by bifidobacteria. Curr Microbiol 34:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tanaka H, Doesburg K, Iwasaki T, Mierau I (1999) Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity. J Dairy Sci 82:2530–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tanaka H, Hashiba H, Kok J, Mierau I (2000) Bile salt hydrolase of Bifidobacterium longum—biochemical and genetic characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2502–2512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taranto MP, Medici M, Perdigon G, Ruiz Holgado AP, Valdez GF (2000) Effect of Lactobacillus reuteri on the prevention of hypercholesterolemia in mice. J Dairy Sci 83:401–403Google Scholar
  32. Usman, Hosono A (1999) Bile tolerance, taurocholate deconjugation, and binding of cholesterol by Lactobacillus gasseri strains. J Dairy Sci 82:243–248Google Scholar
  33. Young J (1998) European market developments in prebiotic- and probiotic-containing foodstuffs. British J Nutr 80:S231–S233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Martoni
    • 1
  • Jasmine Bhathena
    • 1
  • Aleksandra Malgorzata Urbanska
    • 1
  • Satya Prakash
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Technology and Cell Therapy Research Laboratory, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, Artificial Cells and Organs Research Center, Faculty of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations