Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 79, Issue 2, pp 273–283 | Cite as

Gene expression profiles and intracellular contents of stress protectants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol and sorbitol stresses

Applied Microbial and Cell Physiology


In response to osmotic stress, proline is accumulated in many bacterial and plant cells. During various stresses, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae induces glycerol or trehalose synthesis, but the fluctuations in gene expression and intracellular levels of proline in yeast are not yet well understood. We previously found that proline protects yeast cells from damage by freezing, oxidative, or ethanol stress. In this study, we examined the relationships between the gene expression profiles and intracellular contents of glycerol, trehalose, and proline under stress conditions. When yeast cells were exposed to 1 M sorbitol stress, the expression of GPD1 encoding glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is induced, leading to glycerol accumulation. In contrast, in the presence of 9% ethanol, the rapid induction of TPS2 encoding trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase resulted in trehalose accumulation. We found that intracellular proline levels did not increase immediately after addition of sorbitol or ethanol. However, the expressions of genes involved in proline synthesis and degradation did not change during exposure to these stresses. It appears that the elevated proline levels are due primarily to an increase in proline uptake from a nutrient medium caused by the induction of PUT4. These results suggest that S. cerevisiae cells do not accumulate proline in response to sorbitol or ethanol stress different from other organisms.


Saccharomyces cerevisiae Stress response Proline Gene Expression Glycerol Trehalose 


  1. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Prior BA (1994) Characterization of the osmotic-stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: osmotic stress and glucose repression regulate glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase independently. Curr Genet 25:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S, Blondin B (2001) Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 498:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alizadeh P, Klionsky DJ (1996) Purification and biochemical characterization of the ATH1 gene product, vacuolar acid trehalase, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 391:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ando A, Nakamura T, Murata Y, Takagi H, Shima J (2007) Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to freeze–thaw stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains. FEMS Yeast Res 7:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. André L, Hemming A, Adler L (1991) Osmoregulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Studies on the osmotic induction of glycerol production and glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+). FEBS Lett 286:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aravind L, Koonin EV (1999) Novel predicted RNA-binding domains associated with the translation machinery. J Mol Evol 48:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Attfield PV (1987) Trehalose accumulates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during exposure to agents that induce heat shock response. FEBS Lett 225:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell W, Sun W, Hohmann S, Wera S, Reinders A, De Virgilio C, Wiemken A, Thevelein JM (1998) Composition and functional analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae trehalose synthase complex. J Biol Chem 273:33311–33319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blomberg A, Adler L (1989) Roles of glycerol and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) in acquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 171:1087–1092Google Scholar
  10. Brandriss MC (1983) Proline utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of the cloned PUT2 gene. Mol Cell Biol 3:1846–1856Google Scholar
  11. Brandriss MC, Falvey DA (1992) Proline biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of the PRO3 gene, which encodes Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase. J Bacteriol 174:3782–3788Google Scholar
  12. Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES, Young RA (2001) Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 12:323–337Google Scholar
  13. Chen C, Dickman MB (2005) Proline suppresses apoptosis in the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum trifolii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:3459–3464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Degols G, Jauniaux JC, Wiame JM (1987) Molecular characterization of transposable-element-associated mutations that lead to constitutive l-ornithine aminotransferase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem 165:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delauney AJ, Verma DPS (1993) Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J 4:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garay-Arroyo A, Lledías F, Hansberg W, Covarrubias AA (2003) Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for resistance to hyperosmosis. FEBS Lett 539:68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gent DP, Slaughter JC (1998) Intracellular distribution of amino acids in an slp1 vacuole-deficient mutant of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol 84:752–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallsworth JE (1998) Ethanol-induced water stress in yeast. J Ferment Bioeng 85:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallsworth JE, Heim S, Timmis KN (2003a) Chaotropic solutes cause water stress in Pseudomonas putida. Environ Microbiol 5:1270–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallsworth JE, Prior BA, Nomura Y, Iwahara M, Timmis KN (2003b) Compatible solutes protect against chaotrope (ethanol)-induced, nonosmotic water stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:7032–7034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hong Z, Lakkineni K, Zhang Z, Verma DP (2000) Removal of feedback inhibition of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol 122:1129–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kandror O, Bretschneider N, Kreydin E, Cavalieri D, Goldberg AL (2004) Yeast adapt to near-freezing temperatures by STRE/Msn2,4-dependent induction of trehalose synthesis and certain molecular chaperones. Mol Cell 13:771–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kavi Kishor PB, Hong Z, Miao GH, Hu CAA, Verma DPS (1995) Overexpression of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 108:1387–1394Google Scholar
  24. Kopp M, Müller H, Holzer H (1993) Molecular analysis of the neutral trehalase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 268:4766–4774Google Scholar
  25. Kunkee RE, Bisson LF (1993) Wine-making yeast. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeast. vol. 5. 2nd edn. Academic, San Diego, California, pp 94–99Google Scholar
  26. Larsson K, Ansell R, Eriksson P, Adler L (1993) A gene encoding sn-glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) complements an osmosensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 10:1101–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lasko PF, Brandriss MC (1981) Proline transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 148:241–247Google Scholar
  28. Liang LK, Wang XK, Zhu KL, Chi ZM (2007) Trehalose synthesis in Saccharomycopsis fibuligera does not respond to stress treatments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:1084–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the \(2^{ - \Delta \Delta C_T } \) method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mansure JJC, Panek AD, Crowe LM, Crowe JH (1994) Trehalose inhibits ethanol effects on intact yeast cells and liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1191:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martínez-Force E, Benítez T (1995) Effects of varying media, temperature, and growth rates on the intracellular concentrations of yeast amino acids. Biotechnol Prog 11:386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matsuura K, Takagi H (2005) Vacuolar functions are involved in stress-protective effect of intracellular proline in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 100:538–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Middelhoven WJ (1964) The pathway of arginine breakdown in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 93:650–652Google Scholar
  34. Morita Y, Nakamori S, Takagi H (2003) l-proline accumulation and freeze tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are caused by a mutation in the PRO1 gene encoding γ-glutamyl kinase. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morita Y, Nakamori S, Takagi H (2002) Effect of proline and arginine metabolism on freezing stress of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 94:390–394Google Scholar
  36. Nakashima K, Satoh R, Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1998) A gene encoding proline dehydrogenase is not only induced by proline and hypoosmolarity, but is also developmentally regulated in the reproductive organs of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 118:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohsumi Y, Kitamoto K, Anraku Y (1988) Changes induced in the permeability barrier of the yeast plasma membrane by cupric ion. J Bacteriol 170:2676–2682Google Scholar
  38. Påhlman AK, Granath K, Ansell R, Hohmann S, Adler L (2001) The yeast glycerol 3-phosphatases Gpp1p and Gpp2p are required for glycerol biosynthesis and differentially involved in the cellular responses to osmotic, anaerobic, and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 276:3555–3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Panadero J, Pallotti C, Rodríguez-Vargas S, Randez-Gil F, Prieto JA (2006) A downshift in temperature activates the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway, which determines freeze tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 281:4638–4645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pavlik P, Simon M, Schuster T, Ruis H (1993) The glycerol kinase (GUT1) gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cloning and characterization. Curr Genet 24:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajendrakumar CSV, Suryanarayana T, Reddy AR (1997) DNA helix destabilization by proline and betaine: possible role in the salinity tolerance process. FEBS Lett 410:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ronnow B, Kielland-Brandt MC (1993) GUT2, a gene for mitochondrial glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 9:1121–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rudolph AS, Crowe JH (1985) Membrane stabilization during freezing: the role of two natural cryoprotectants, trehalose and proline. Cryobiology 22:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Samuel D, Kumar TKS, Ganesh G, Jayaraman G, Yang PW, Chang MM, Trivedi VD, Wang SL, Hwang KC, Chang DK, Yu C (2000) Proline inhibits aggregation during protein refolding. Protein Sci 9:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sekine T, Kawaguchi A, Hamano Y, Takagi H (2007) Desensitization of feedback inhibition of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae γ-glutamyl kinase enhances proline accumulation and freezing tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4011–4019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singer MA, Lindquist S (1998) Thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the Yin and Yang of trehalose. Trends Biotechnol 16:460–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sumrada RA, Cooper TG (1984) Nucleotide sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae arginase gene (CAR1) and its transcription under various physiological conditions. J Bacteriol 160:1078–1087Google Scholar
  48. Takagi H, Iwamoto F, Nakamori S (1997) Isolation of freeze-tolerant laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from proline-analogue-resistant mutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Takagi H, Sakai K, Morida K, Nakamori S (2000) Proline accumulation by mutation or disruption of the proline oxidase gene improves resistance to freezing and desiccation stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takagi H, Takaoka M, Kawaguchi A, Kubo Y (2005) Effect of l-proline on sake brewing and ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8656–8662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tamás MJ, Luyten K, Sutherland FCW, Hernandez A, Albertyn J, Valadi H, Li H, Prior BA, Kilian SG, Ramos J, Gustafsson L, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (1999) Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol Microbiol 31:1087–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tamás MJ, Rep M, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (2000) Stimulation of the yeast high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway: evidence for a signal generated by a change in turgor rather than by water stress. FEBS Lett 472:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Terao Y, Nakamori S, Takagi H (2003) Gene dosage effect of l-proline biosynthetic enzymes on l-proline accumulation and freeze tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6527–6532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (1994) Effects of particulate materials and osmoprotectants on very-high-gravity ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1519–1524Google Scholar
  55. Tomenchok DM, Brandriss MC (1987) Gene–enzyme relationships in the proline biosynthetic pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 169:5364–5372Google Scholar
  56. Treger JM, Schmitt AP, Simon JR, McEntee K (1998) Transcriptional factor mutations reveal regulatory complexities of heat shock and newly identified stress genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 273:26875–26879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Dijck P, Colavizza D, Smet P, Thevelein JM (1995) Differential importance of trehalose in stress resistance in fermenting and nonfermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:109–115Google Scholar
  58. Verbruggen N, Hua XJ, May M, Van Montagu M (1996) Environmental and developmental signals modulate proline homeostasis: evidence for a negative transcriptional regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:8787–8791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang SS, Brandriss MC (1986) Proline utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of the cloned PUT1 gene. Mol Cell Biol 6:2638–2645Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Biological SciencesNara Institute of Science and TechnologyNaraJapan

Personalised recommendations