Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 879–890 | Cite as

Enhanced hydrogen production from glucose by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli

  • Toshinari Maeda
  • Viviana Sanchez-Torres
  • Thomas K. WoodEmail author
Applied Genetics and Molecular Biotechnology


To utilize fermentative bacteria for producing the alternative fuel hydrogen, we performed successive rounds of P1 transduction from the Keio Escherichia coli K-12 library to introduce multiple, stable mutations into a single bacterium to direct the metabolic flux toward hydrogen production. E. coli cells convert glucose to various organic acids (such as succinate, pyruvate, lactate, formate, and acetate) to synthesize energy and hydrogen from formate by the formate hydrogen-lyase (FHL) system that consists of hydrogenase 3 and formate dehydrogenase-H. We altered the regulation of FHL by inactivating the repressor encoded by hycA and by overexpressing the activator encoded by fhlA, removed hydrogen uptake activity by deleting hyaB (hydrogenase 1) and hybC (hydrogenase 2), redirected glucose metabolism to formate by using the fdnG, fdoG, narG, focA, focB, poxB, and aceE mutations, and inactivated the succinate and lactate synthesis pathways by deleting frdC and ldhA, respectively. The best of the metabolically engineered strains, BW25113 hyaB hybC hycA fdoG frdC ldhA aceE, increased hydrogen production 4.6-fold from glucose and increased the hydrogen yield twofold from 0.65 to 1.3 mol H2/mol glucose (maximum, 2 mol H2/mol glucose).


Enhanced hydrogen production Metabolic engineering P1 transduction Glucose metabolism Fermentative hydrogen 



The authors thank the National of Institute of Genetics, Japan, for sending the Keio and ASKA clones. This research was supported by DARPA (HR0011–06–1–0001).


  1. Abdel-Hamid AM, Attwood MM, Guest JR (2001) Pyruvate oxidase contributes to the aerobic growth efficiency of Escherichia coli. Microbiology 147:1483–1498Google Scholar
  2. Andrews SC, Berks BC, McClay J, Ambler A, Quail MA, Golby P, Guest JR (1997) A 12-cistron Escherichia coli operon (hyf) encoding a putative proton-translocating formate hydrogenlyase system. Microbiology 143:3633–3647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelides KJ, Akiyama SK, Hammes GG (1979) Subunit stoichiometry and molecular weight of the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:3279–3283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archana A, Sasikala C, Ramana Ch V (2003) Augmentation of H2 photoproduction in Rhodopseudomonas palustris by N-heterocyclic aromatic compounds. Biotechnol Lett 25:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axley MJ, Grahame DA, Stadtman TC (1990) Escherichia coli formate-hydrogen lyase. Purification and properties of the selenium-dependent formate dehydrogenase component. J Biol Chem 265:18213–18218Google Scholar
  6. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2:2006–0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagramyan K, Trchounian A (2003) Structural and functional features of formate hydrogen lyase, an enzyme of mixed-acid fermentation from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry (Mosc) 68: 1159–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertero MG, Rothery RA, Palak M, Hou C, Lim D, Blasco F, Weiner JH, Strynadka NC (2003) Insights into the respiratory electron transfer pathway from the structure of nitrate reductase A. Nat Struct Biol 10:681–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blattner FR, Plunkett G 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y (1997) The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Böck A, Sawers G (1996) Cellular and Molecular Biology. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss JR II, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (eds) Escherichia coli and Salmonella. 2nd edn. ASM Press, Washington, pp 262–282Google Scholar
  11. Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W (1995) Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene 158:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Das D, Veziroğlu TN (2001) Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6640–6645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn S (2002) Hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27:235–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans DJ, Pickett CJ (2003) Chemistry and the hydrogenases. Chem Soc Rev 32:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forzi L, Sawers RG (2007) Maturation of [NiFe]-hydrogenases in Escherichia coli. Biometals 20:565–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glick BR, Wang PY, Schneider H, Martin WG (1980) Identification and partial characterization of an Escherichia coli mutant with altered hydrogenase activity. Can J Biochem 58:361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansel A, Lindblad P (1998) Toward optimization of cyanobacteria as biotechnologically relevant producers of molecular hydrogen, a clean and renewable energy source. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iverson TM, Luna-Chavez C, Cecchini G, Rees DC (1999) Structure of the Escherichia coli fumarate reductase respiratory complex. Science 284:1961–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jung GY, Jung HO, Kim JR, Ahn Y, Park S (1999) Isolation and characterization of Rhodopseudomonas palustris P4 which utilizes CO with the production of H2. Biotechnol Lett 21:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitagawa M, Ara T, Arifuzzaman M, Ioka-Nakamichi T, Inamoto E, Toyonaga H, Mori H (2005) Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (A complete set of E. coli K-12 ORF archive): unique resources for biological research. DNA Res 12:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klibanov AM, Alberti BN, Zale SE (1982) Enzymatic synthesis of formic acid from H2 and CO2 and production of hydrogen from formic acid. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraemer JT, Bagley DM (2007) Improving the yield from fermentative hydrogen production. Biotechnol Lett 29:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee SJ, Lee DY, Kim TY, Kim BH, Lee J, Lee SY (2005) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for enhanced production of succinic acid, based on genome comparison and in silico gene knockout simulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7880–7887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maeda T, Sanchez-Torres V, Wood TK (2007a) Escherichia coli hydrogenase 3 is a reversible enzyme possessing hydrogen uptake and synthesis activities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:1035–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maeda T, Sanchez-Torres V, Wood TK (2007b) Metabolic engineering to enhance bacterial hydrogen production. Microb Biotechnol. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2007.00003.x
  27. Maeda T, Vardar G, Self WT, Wood TK (2007c) Inhibition of hydrogen uptake in Escherichia coli by expressing the hydrogenase from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. BMC Biotechnol 7:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mat-Jan F, Alam KY, Clark DP (1989) Mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in the fermentative lactate dehydrogenase. J Bacteriol 171:342–348Google Scholar
  29. Minnan L, Jinli H, Xiaobin W, Huijuan X, Jinzao C, Chuannan L, Fengzhang Z, Liangshu X (2005) Isolation and characterization of a high H2-producing strain Klebsiella oxytoca HP1 from a hot spring. Res Microbiol 156:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oh Y-K, Seol E-H, Kim JR, Park S (2003) Fermentative biohydrogen by a new chemoheterotrophic bacterium Citrobacter sp. Y19. Int J Hydrogen Energy 28:1353–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patnaik R, Louie S, Gavrilovic V, Perry K, Stemmer WP, Ryan CM, del Cardayré S (2002) Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat Biotechnol 20:707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Penfold DW, Forster CF, Macaskie LE (2003) Increased hydrogen production by Escherichia coli strain HD701 in comparison with the wild-type parent strain MC4100. Enzyme Microb Technol 33:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penfold DW, Sargent F, Macaskie LE (2006) Inactivation of the Escherichia coli K-12 twin-arginine translocation system promotes increased hydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:135–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rachman MA, Furutani Y, Nakashimada Y, Kakizono T, Nishio N (1997) Enhanced hydrogen production in altered mixed acid fermentation of glucose by Enterobacter aerogenes. J Ferment Bioeng 83:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rossmann R, Sawers G, Böck A (1991) Mechanism of regulation of the formate-hydrogenlyase pathway by oxygen, nitrate, and pH: definition of the formate regulon. Mol Microbiol 5:2807–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlensog V, Lutz S, Böck A (1994) Purification and DNA-binding properties of FHLA, the transcriptional activator of the formate hydrogenlyase system from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 269:19590–19596Google Scholar
  38. Silhavy TJ, Berman ML, Enquist LW (1984) Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring Habor, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Sode K, Watanabe M, Makimoto H, Tomiyama M (1999) Construction and characterization of fermentative lactate dehydrogenase Escherichia coli mutant and its potential for bacterial hydrogen production. Appl Biochem Biotech 77–79:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suppmann B, Sawers G (1994) Isolation and characterization of hypophosphite-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli: identification of the FocA protein, encoded by the pfl operon, as a putative formate transporter. Mol Microbiol 11:965–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Gunsalus RP (2003) Coordinate regulation of the Escherichia coli formate dehydrogenase fdnGHI and fdhF genes in response to nitrate, nitrite, and formate: roles for NarL and NarP. J Bacteriol 185:5076–5085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woods DD (1936) Hydrogenlyases: the synthesis of formic acid by bacteria. Biochem J 30:515–527Google Scholar
  43. Yi KB, Harrison DP (2005) Low-pressure sorption-enhanced hydrogen production. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:1665–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yoshida A, Nishimura T, Kawaguchi H, Inui M, Yukawa H (2005) Enhanced hydrogen production from formic acid by formate hydrogen lyase-overexpressing Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6762–6768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yoshida A, Nishimura T, Kawaguchi H, Inui M, Yukawa H (2006) Enhanced hydrogen production from glucose using ldh- and frd-inactivated Escherichia coli strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshinari Maeda
    • 1
  • Viviana Sanchez-Torres
    • 1
  • Thomas K. Wood
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical EngineeringTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations