Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 76, Issue 5, pp 1145–1152 | Cite as

Endophytic bacteria in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): isolation, characterization, and production of jasmonates and abscisic acid in culture medium

  • G. Forchetti
  • O. Masciarelli
  • S. Alemano
  • D. Alvarez
  • G. Abdala
Applied Microbial and Cell Physiology
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

This study was designed to isolate and characterize endophytic bacteria from sunflower (Helianthus annuus) grown under irrigation and water stress (drought) conditions, to analyze growth of isolated bacteria under drought condition, and to evaluate the ability of bacteria isolated from plants cultivated under drought to produce jasmonates (JAs) and abscisic acid (ABA). Bacteria were isolated from soil samples collected when sunflower plants were at the end of the vegetative stage. A total of 29 endophytic strains were isolated from plants grown under irrigation or drought condition. Eight strains (termed SF1 through SF8) were selected based on nitrogen-fixing ability. All eight strains showed positive catalase and oxidase activities; five strains (SF2, SF3, SF4, SF5, SF7) solubilized phosphates; none of the strains produced siderophores. Strains SF2, SF3, SF4, and SF5, the ones with the highest phosphate solubilization ability, strongly inhibited growth of the pathogenic fungi Verticillum orense and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum but had less inhibitory effect on Alternaria sp. Among the eight strains, SF2 showed 99.9% sequence homology with Achromobacter xiloxidans or Alcaligenes sp., while the other seven showed 99.9% homology with Bacillus pumilus. Strains SF2, SF3, and SF4 grown in control medium produced jasmonic acid (JA), 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), and ABA. These three strains did not differ in amount of JA or OPDA produced. ABA content was higher than that of JA, and production of both ABA and JA increased under drought condition. The characteristics of these isolated bacterial strains have technological implications for inoculant formulation and improved growth of sunflower crops.

Keywords

Sunflower PGPR Jasmonates Abscisic acid 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from SECYT-UNRC, CONICET, and ANPCYT to G.A., and fellowship from CONICET to G.F.

References

  1. Abdala G, Miersch O, Correa N, Rosas S (1999) Detection of jasmonic acid in cultures of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Prod Lett 14(1):55–63Google Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo W, Maccheroni W, Aguilar-Vildosa C, Baroso P, Saridakis H, Azevedo J (2001) Variability and interactions between endophytic bacteria and fungi isolated from leaf tissue of citrus rootstocks. Can J Microbiol 47:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu SK (1998) A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato. Am J Potato Res 75:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassán F, Paz R, Maiale S, Masciarelli O, Vidal A, Luna V, Ruíz O (2005) Cadaverine production by Azospirillum brasilense Az39. A new plant growth promotion mechanism. XV Annual Meeting Sociedad de Biología de Córdoba. Argentina. pp 103 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  6. Cattelan AJ, Hartel PG, Fuhrmann JJ (1999) Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1670–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobbelaere SJ, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y (2003) Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:107–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Döbereiner J, Day J (1976) Associative symbioses in tropical grasses: characterization of microorganisms and dinitrogen fixing sites. In: Newton WE, Nymans J (eds). Symposium on nitrogen fixation. Washington State University Press, Pullman WA, pp 518–538Google Scholar
  9. Feng J, Barker AV (1992) Ethylene evolution and ammonium accumulation by tomato plants under water and salinity stresses. Part II. J Plant Nutr 15:2471–2490Google Scholar
  10. Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gutiérrez-Mañero FJ, Acero N, Lucas J, Probanza A (1996) The influence of native rhizobacteria on European alder (Agnus glutinosa L. Gaertn.) growth II. Characterization and biological assays of metabolites from growth inhibiting bacteria. Plant Soil 182:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutiérrez-Mañero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo F, Talon M (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall MA, Smith AR (1995) Ethylene and the responses of plants to stress. Bulg J Plant Physiol 21:71–79Google Scholar
  14. Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahafee WF, Kloepper JW (1997) Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol 43(10):895–914Google Scholar
  15. Hanada R, Romeiro R (1998) Seleção preliminar de rizobacterias como promotoras de crescimento e como indutoras de resistência sistêmica a Xanthomonas campestris em girassol. International Seed Testing Association. (1995) 24th Congress of Copenhangen. Published by ISTA, Zurich, CH-Switzerland. Fitopatologia Brasileira 23:209 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Higgins DG, Bleasby AJ, Fuchs R (1992) Clustal V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. CABIOS 8:189–191Google Scholar
  17. Katznelson H, Bose B (1959) Metabolic activity and phosphate dissolving capability of bacterial isolates from wheat root, rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil. Can J Microbiol 5:79–85Google Scholar
  18. Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2004) Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 96:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1994) ERD15, a cDNA for a dehydration-induce gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 106:1707-1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kobayashi DY, Palumbo JD (2000) Bacterial endophytes and their effects on plants and uses in agriculture. In: James C, White J, Jr (eds) Microbial endophytes. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 199-233Google Scholar
  21. Kolb W, Martín P (1985) Response of plant roots to inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and two application of indole acetic acid. In: Klingmüller W (ed). Azospirillum III: Genetics, Physiology, Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 215-221Google Scholar
  22. Kramell R, Miersch O, Atzorn R, Parthier B, Wasternack C (2000) Octadecanoid-derived alteration of gene expression and the “oxylipin signature” in stressed barley leaves. Implications for different signaling pathways. Plant Physiol 123:177-187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Z, Sinclair J (1989) A primary study on biological control of Rhizoctonia Damping-off, root and crown decay of soybeans J Cell Biochem Suppl 13A:177 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  24. Liu Z, Sinclair J (1993) Colonization of soybean roots by Bacillus megaterium B153-2-2. Soil Biol Bochem 25:849–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martínez-Morales L, Soto-Urzua L, Baca B, Sanchez-Ahedo J (2003) Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) production in culture medium by wild strain Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol Letters 228:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Misaghi I, Donndelinger C (1990) Endophytic bacteria in symptom-free cotton plants. Phytopathology 80:808–811Google Scholar
  28. Morgan PW, Drew MC (1997) Ethylene and plant responses to stress. Physiol Plant 100:620–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller M, Desgele C, Ziegler H (1989) Hormonal interactions in the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays L.) and their effects on plant development. Z Pflanzenernahr Bodenkd 152:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pedranzani H, Racagni G, Alemano S, Miersch O, Ramírez I, Peña Cortés H, Machado-Domenech E, Abdala G (2003) Salt tolerant tomato plants show increased levels of jasmonic acid. Plant Growth Regul 41(2):149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ping L, Boland W (2004) Signals from the underground: bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 9:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophore. Anal Biochem 160:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Srinivasan M, Peterson DJ, Holl FB (1996) Influence of IAA producing Bacillus isolates on the nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris by Rhyzobium etli under gnotobiotic conditions. Can J Microbiol 42:1006–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sturz AV, Christie BR (1995) The role of endophytic bacteria during seed piece decay and potato tuberization. Plant Soil 175:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J (2000) Bacterial Endophytes: Potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Crit Rev Plant Sci 19(1):1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timmusk S, Wagner EGH (1999) The plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Mol Plant-microb Interact 12:951–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wasternack C, Hause B (2002) Jasmonates and octadecanoids: signals in plant stress responses and development. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 72:165–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zakharova E, Scherbakov A, Brudnik V, Skripko N, Bulkhim SH, Ignatov V (1999) Biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid in Azospirillum Brasilense: insight from quantum chemistry. Env J Biochem 259:572–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang J, Jia W, Yang JZ, Ismail AM (2006) Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Res 97:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Forchetti
    • 1
  • O. Masciarelli
    • 1
  • S. Alemano
    • 1
  • D. Alvarez
    • 2
  • G. Abdala
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físico-Químicas y NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de Río CuartoRío CuartoArgentina
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Tecnología AgropecuariaINTA-EEA ManfrediBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations