Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 76, Issue 4, pp 927–934 | Cite as

Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria

  • Sunny C. Jiang
  • Weiping Chu
  • Betty H. Olson
  • Jian-Wen He
  • Samuel Choi
  • Jenny Zhang
  • Joanne Y. Le
  • Phillip B. Gedalanga
Environmental Biotechnology

Abstract

Three independent microbial source tracking (MST) methods were applied to a small urban subwatershed in Orange County, California. Fifty-seven water samples collected over summer 2002 were analyzed for human adenovirus and enterovirus. Enterococci and E. coli were isolated for antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA) and for PCR identification of human- and animal-specific toxin genes, respectively. All water samples were PCR negative for human enteroviruses and E. coli human-specific toxin gene. E. coli toxin markers revealed the presence of toxin genes specific to bird, rabbit, and cow. Enterococci ARA results supported this conclusion and indicated that fecal bacteria from bird and wild animal feces as well as soil were the predominant source found in the watershed. An E. coli, isolated from the watershed and inoculated back into the heat-sterilized storm drain water, increased 4 log units within 6 days. Collectively, these results suggest that bird and wild animal feces, soil amendments, and/or fecal coliform growth in the storm drain are the major contributors to the fecal bacterial pollution in downstream areas. However, human adenoviruses were detected on two occasions. Fecal bacterial concentrations were not elevated on these two occasions, suggesting that the elevated levels of fecal indicator bacteria in this small watershed could be unrelated to the source of human adenovirus.

Keywords

Microbial source tracking (MST) Urban watershed Human virus E. coli biomarkers Adenovirus Enterovirus Antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported by a fund from the County of Orange, California. The field sampling effort was supported by Public Facility and Resource Department of County of Orange. Special thanks go to Chris Crompton, Bruce Moore, and Mary Brill at County of Orange for their valuable input on research design and field logistics support; to Nancy Palmer at City of Laguna Niguel for providing background data on the research site and valuable input on the study design; and to Erica Dunbar at UCI for the assistance with growth experiment.

Supplementary material

253_2007_1047_MOESM1_ESM.doc (76 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 75.5 kb)

References

  1. Adams LM, Simmons CP, Rezmann L, Strugnell RA, Robins-Browne RM (1997) Identification and characterization of a K88- and CS31A-like operon of a rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain which encodes fimbriae involved in the colonization of rabbit intestine. Infect Immun 65:5222–5230Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MA, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ (2006) Diversity and distribution of Escherichia coli genotypes and antibiotic resistance phenotypes in feces of humans, cattle, and horses. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6914–6922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry ED, Miller DN (2005) Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content: II. Impact on Escherichia coli 0157. J Environ Qual 34:656–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanch AR, Belanche-Munoz L, Bonjoch X, Ebdon J, Gantzer C, Lucena F, Ottoson J, Kourtis C, Iversen A, Kuhn I, Moce L, Muniesa M, Schwartzbrod J, Skraber S, Papageorgiou GT, Taylor H, Wallis J, Jofre J (2006) Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5915–5926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Board SDRWQC (2003) San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, Clean-up & Abatement Order 99-211, Quarterly Progress Report, City of Laguna Niguel, County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control DistrictGoogle Scholar
  6. Chern EC, Tsai YL, Olson BH (2004) Occurrence of genes associated with enterotoxigenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in agricultural waste lagoons. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi S, Jiang SC (2005) Real-time PCR quantification of human adenoviruses in urban rivers indicates genome prevalence but low infectivity. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7426–7433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi S, Chu WP, Brown J, Becker SJ, Harwood VJ, Jiang SC (2003) Application of enterococci antibiotic resistance patterns for contamination source identification at Huntington Beach, California. Mar Pollut Bull 46:748–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craun GF, Calderon RL (2006) Workshop summary: estimating waterborne disease risks in the United States. J Water Health 4:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebdon JE, Taylor HD (2006) Geographical stability of enterococcal antibiotic resistance profiles in Europe and its implications for the identification of fecal sources. Environ Sci Technol 40:5327–5332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enriquez CE, Hurst CJ, Gerba CP (1995) Survival of the enteric adenoviruses 40 and 41 in tap, sea, and waste water. Water Res 29:2548–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field KG, Bernhard AE, Brodeur TJ (2003a) Molecular approaches to microbiological monitoring: fecal source detection. Environ Monit Assess 81:313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field KG, Chern EC, Dick LK, Fuhrman J, Griffith J, Holden PA, LaMontagne MG, Olson B, Simonich MT (2003b) A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking. J Water Health 1:181–194Google Scholar
  14. Gaun SK, Xu RL, Chen S, Odumeru J, Gyles C (2002) Development of a procedure for discriminating among Escherichia coli isolates from animal and human sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2690–2698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerba CP, Gramos DM, Nwachuku N (2002) Comparative inactivation of enteroviruses and adenovirus 2 by UV light. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5167–5169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffith JF, Weisberg SB, McGee CD (2003) Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples. J Water Health 1:141–151Google Scholar
  17. Hagedorn C, Robinson SL, Filtz JR, Grubbs SM, Angier TA, Reneau RB (1999) Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5522–5531Google Scholar
  18. Harwood VJ, Whitlock J, Withington V (2000) Classification of antibiotic resistance patterns of indicator bacteria by discriminant analysis: use in predicting the source of fecal contamination in subtropical waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3698–3704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishii S, Ksoll WB, Hicks RE, Sadowsky MJ (2006) Presence and growth of naturalized Escherichia coli in temperate soils from lake superior watersheds. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:612–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang SC, Chu W (2004) PCR detection of pathogenic viruses in southern California urban rivers. J Appl Microbiol 97:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang S, Noble R, Chu W (2001) Human adenoviruses and coliphages in urban runoff-impacted coastal waters of Southern California. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson JR, Stell AL (2001) PCR for specific detection of H7 flagellar variant of fliC among extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 39:3712–3717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson JR, O’Bryan TT, Low DA, Ling G, Delavari P, Fasching C, Russo TA, Carlino U, Stell AL (2000) Evidence of commonality between canine and human extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains that express papG allele III. Infect Immun 68:3327–3336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khatib LA, Tsai YL, Olson BH (2002) A biomarker for the identification of cattle fecal pollution in water using the LTIIa toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khatib LA, Tsai YL, Olson BH (2003) A biomarker for the identification of swine fecal pollution in water, using the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LeJeune JT, Besser TE, Hancock DD (2001) Cattle water troughs as reservoirs of Escherichia coli O157. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3053–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore DF, Harwood VJ, Ferguson DM, Lukasik J, Hannah P, Getrich M, Brownell M (2005) Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed. J Appl Microbiol 99:618–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noble R, Allen S, Blackwood A, Chu W, Jiang S, Lovelace G, Sobsey M, Stewart J, Wait D (2003) Use of viral pathogens and indicators to differentiate between human and non-human fecal contamination in a microbial source tracking comparison study. J Water Health 1:195–207Google Scholar
  29. Olson BH, Oshiro RK (1997) Occurrence of STh toxin gene in wastewater. In: Kay D, Fricher C (eds) Coliforms and E. coli: problem or solution? The Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Provence DL, Curtiss R (1994) Isolation and characterization of a gene involved in hemagglutination by an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect Immun 62:1369–1380Google Scholar
  31. Rajkowski KT, Rice EW (1999) Recovery and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in reconditioned pork-processing wastewater. J Food Prot 62:731–734Google Scholar
  32. Scott TM, Rose JB, Jenkins TM, Farrah SR, Lukasik J (2002) Microbial source tracking: current methodology and future directions. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5796–5803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simpson JM, Santo-Domingo JW, Reasoner DJ (2002) Microbial source tracking: state of the science. Environ Sci Technol 36:5289–5729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinton LW, Finlay RK, Hannah DJ (1998) Distinguishing human from animal faecal contamination in water: a review. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 32:323–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stewart JR, Ellender RD, Gooch JA, Jiang S, Myoda SP, Weisberg SB (2003) Recommendations for microbial source tracking: lessons from a methods comparison study. J Water Health 1:225–231Google Scholar
  36. Stoeckel DM, Mathes MV, Hyer KE, Hagedorn C, Kator H, Lukasik J, O’Brien TL, Fenger TW, Samadpour M, Strickler KM, Wiggins BA (2004) Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol 38:6109–6117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Topp E, Welsh M, Tien YC, Dang A, Lazarovits G, Conn K, Zhu H (2003) Strain-dependent variability in growth and survival of Escherichia coli in agricultural soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsai YL, Olson BH (1991) Rapid method for direct extraction of DNA from soil and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1070–1074Google Scholar
  39. Wiggins BA, Andrews RW, Conway RA, Corr CL, Dobratz EJ, Dougherty DP, Eppard JR, Knupp SR, Limjoco MC, Mettenburg JM, Rinehardt JM, Sonsino J, Torrijos RL, Zimmerman ME (1999) Use of antibiotic resistance analysis to identify nonpoint sources of fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3483–3486Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sunny C. Jiang
    • 1
  • Weiping Chu
    • 1
  • Betty H. Olson
    • 1
  • Jian-Wen He
    • 1
  • Samuel Choi
    • 1
  • Jenny Zhang
    • 1
  • Joanne Y. Le
    • 1
  • Phillip B. Gedalanga
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations