Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 101–108 | Cite as

Medium optimization of antifungal lipopeptide, iturin A, production by Bacillus subtilis in solid-state fermentation by response surface methodology

  • Shinji Mizumoto
  • Makoto ShodaEmail author
Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering

Abstract

Iturin A, a lipopeptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus subtilis RB14-CS, suppresses the growth of various plant pathogens. Here, enhancement of iturin A production in solid-state fermentation (SSF) on okara, a soybean curd residue produced during tofu manufacturing, was accomplished using statistical experimental design. Primary experiments showed that the concentrations of carbon and nitrogen sources were the main factors capable of enhancing iturin A production, whereas initial pH, initial water content, temperature, relative humidity, and volume of inoculum were only minor factors. Glucose and soybean meal were the most effective among tested carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively. Based on these preliminary findings, response surface methodology was applied to predict the optimum amounts of the carbon and nitrogen sources in the medium. The maximum iturin A concentration was 5,591 μg/g initial wet okara under optimized condition. Subsequent experiments confirmed that iturin A production was significantly improved under the predicted optimal medium conditions. The SSF product generated under the optimized conditions exhibited significantly higher suppressive effect on the damping-off of tomato caused by Rhizoctonia solani K-1 compared with the product generated under the non-optimized conditions.

Keywords

Optimization Iturin A Bacillus subtilis Solid-state fermentation Response surface methodology 

References

  1. Asaka O, Shoda M (1996) Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off of tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4081–4085Google Scholar
  2. Castilho LR, Medronho RA, Alves TLM (2000) Production and extraction of pectinases obtained by solid state fermentation of agroindustrial residues with Aspergillus niger. Bioresour Technol 71:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper DG, MacDonald CR, Duff STB, Kosaric N (1981) Enhanced production of surfactin from Bacillus subtilis by continuous product removal and metal cation additions. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:408–412Google Scholar
  4. Durand A (2003) Bioreactor designs for solid state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 13:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elinbaum S, Ferreyra H, Ellenrieder G, Cuevas C (2002) Production of Aspergillus terreus β-l-rhamnosidase by solid state fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gawande PV, Kamat MY (1999) Production of Aspergillus xylanase by lignocellulosic waste fermentation and its application. J Appl Microbiol 87:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacques P, Hbid C, Destain J, Razfindralambo H, Paquot M, De Pauw E, Thonart P (1999) Optimization of biosurfactant lipopeptide production from Bacillus subtilis S449 by Plackett–Burman design. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77–70:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolicheski MB, Roccol CR, Marin B, Medeiros E, Raimbault M (1997) Citric acid production on three cellulosic supports in solid state fermentation. In: Roussos S, Lonsane BK, Raimbault M, Viniegra-Gonzalez G (eds) Advances in solid state fermentation—Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on solid state fermentation FMS-95. Montpellier, France, pp 449–462Google Scholar
  9. Leclere V, Bechet M, Adam A, Guez JS, Wathelet B, Ongena M, Thonart P, Gancel F, Chollet-Imbert M, Jacques P (2005) Mycosubtilin overproduction by Bacillus subtilis BBG100 enhances the organism’s antagonistic and biocontrol activities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4577–4584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mizumoto S, Hirai M, Shoda M (2006) Production of lipopeptide antibiotic iturin A using soybean curd residue cultivated with Bacillus subtilis in solid-state fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:869–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Montesinos E (2003) Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection. Int Microbiol 6:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153:375–380Google Scholar
  13. Ohno A, Ano T, Shoda M (1995) Effect of temperature on production of lipopeptide antibiotics, iturin A and surfactin by a dual producer, Bacillus subtilis RB14, in solid-state fermentation. J Ferment Bioeng 80:517–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ortiz-Vazouez E, Granados-Baeza M, Rivera-Munoz G (1993) Effect of culture conditions on lipolytic enzyme production by Penicillium candidum in a solid state fermentation. Biotechnol Adv 11:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park YS, Kang SW, Lee JS, Hong SI (2002) Xylanase production in solid state fermentation by Aspergillus niger mutant using statistical experimental designs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:761–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raghavarao KSMS, Ranganathan TV, Karanth NG (2003) Some engineering aspects of solid-state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 13:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Raimbault M (1998) General and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. EJB Electron J Biotechnol 1:174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Somogyi J (1952) Notes on sugar determination. J Biol Chem 195:19–32Google Scholar
  19. Souza MCO, Robetro IC, Milagres AMF (1999) Solid-state fermentation for xylanase production by Thermoascus aurantiacus using response surface methodology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sugano Y, Matsuo C, Shoda M (2001) Efficient production of a heterologous peroxidase, DyP from Geotrichum candidum Dec1, on solid-state culture of Aspergillus oryzae RD005. J Biosci Bioeng 92:594–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tarocco F, Lecuona RE, Couto AS, Arcas JA (2005) Optimization of erythritol and glycerol accumulation in conidia of Beauveria bassiana by solid-state fermentation, using response surface methodology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tengerdy RP, Szakacs G (1998) Perspectives in agrobiotechnology. J Biotechnol 66:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiong C, Shouwen C, Ming Z, Ziniu Y (2005) Medium optimization by response surface methodology for poly-γ-glutamic acid production using dairy manure as the basis of a solid substrate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Resources LaboratoryTokyo Institute of TechnologyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations