Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 598–607 | Cite as

Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern

  • Om V. Singh
  • Shivani Ghai
  • Debarati Paul
  • Rakesh K. Jain
Mini-Review

Abstract

With the emergence of transgenic technologies, new ways to improve the agronomic performance of crops for food, feed, and processing applications have been devised. In addition, ability to express foreign genes using transgenic technologies has opened up options for producing large quantities of commercially important industrial or pharmaceutical products in plants. Despite this high adoption rate and future promises, there is a multitude of concerns about the impact of genetically modified (GM) crops on the environment. Potential contamination of the environment and food chains has prompted detailed consideration of how such crops and the molecules that they produce can be effectively isolated and contained. One of the reasonable steps after creating a transgenic plant is to evaluate its potential benefits and risks to the environment and these should be compared to those generated by traditional agricultural practices. The precautionary approach in risk management of GM plants may make it necessary to monitor significant wild and weed populations that might be affected by transgene escape. Effective risk assessment and monitoring mechanisms are the basic prerequisites of any legal framework to adequately address the risks and watch out for new risks. Several agencies in different countries monitor the release of GM organisms or frame guidelines for the appropriate application of recombinant organisms in agro-industries so as to assure the safe use of recombinant organisms and to achieve sound overall development. We feel that it is important to establish an internationally harmonized framework for the safe handling of recombinant DNA organisms within a few years.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Om V. Singh and Shivani Ghai have equally contributed to this work.

References

  1. Ahmed FE (2002) Detection of genetically modified organism in food. Trends Biotechnol 20:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen GC, Spiken S, Thompson WF (2005) Transgenic integration: use of matrix attachment regions. Methods Mol Biol 286:313–326Google Scholar
  3. Anklem E, Gadani F, Heinze P, Pijnenburg H, Eede GVD, Europe, PM (2002) Analytical methods for detection and determination of genetically modified organisms in agricultural crops and plant-derived food products. Eur Food Res Technol 214:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auer CA (2003) Tracking genes from seed to supermarket: techniques and traits. Trends Plant Sci 8:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett R, Phipps R, Strange S, Grey P (2004) Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment. Plant Biotechnol 2:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betz FS, Hammond BG, Fuchs RL (2000) Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 32:156–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bizily SP, Rugh CL, Summers AO, Meagher RB (1999) Phytoremediation of methyl mercury pollution: merB expression in Arabidopsis thaliana confers resistance to organomercurials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6808–6813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock R, Khan MS (2004) Taming plastids for a green future. Trends Biotechnol 22:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bordoni R, Mezzelani A, Consolandi C, Frosini A, Rizzi E, Castigloni B, Salati C, Marmiroli N, Marchelli R, Bernardi LR, Battaglia C, Bellis GD (2004) Detection and quantitation of genetically modified maize (Bt-176 transgenic maize) by applying ligation detection reaction and universal array technology. J Agric Food Chem 52:1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradford KJ, Deynze AV, Gutterson N, Parrott W, Strauss SH (2005) Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Nat Biotechnol 23:439–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broothaerts W, Mitchell HJ, Weir B, Kaines S, Smith LMA, Yang W, Mayer JE, Rodriguez C, Jefferson RA (2005) Gene transfer to plants by diverse species of bacteria. Nature 433:629–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown K (2001) Seeds of concern. Sci Am 284:52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne P (2004) Labelling of genetically engineered foods: food and nutrition series. (http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/foodnut/09371.html)
  14. Carpenter JE, Gianessi LP (2001) Agricultural biotechnology: updated benefit estimates. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. CAST (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) (2000) Ecological impact assessment. Science source for food, agricultural, and environmental issues. Ames, IA, USA: CAST (http://www.cast-science.org/pubs/cropregulation.pdf)
  16. CAST (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) (2001) Evaluation of the US Regulatory Process for Crop Developed Through Biotechnology. Issue Paper 19. Ames, IA, USA: CAST (http://www.cast-science.org/pubs/cropregulation.pdf)
  17. Chamier B, Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W (1993) Natural transformation of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus by plasmid DNA adsorbed on sand and groundwater aquifer material. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1662–1667Google Scholar
  18. Cho MJ, Yano H, Okamoto D, Kim HK, Jung HR, Newcomb K, Le VK, Yoo HS, Langham, R, Buchanan BB, Lemaux PG (2004) Stable transformation of rice (Oryzae sativa L.) via microprojectile bombardment of highly regenerative, green tissues derived from mature seed. Plant Cell Rep 22:483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniell H (2002) Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 20:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Degnan FH (1997) The food label and the right-to-know. Food Drug Law J 52:49–60Google Scholar
  21. Ding J, Jai J, Yang L, Wen H, Zhang C, Liu W, Zhang D (2004) Validation of a rice specific gene, sucrose phosphate synthase, used as the endogenous reference gene for qualitative and real-time quantitative PCR detection of transgenes. J Agric Food Chem 53:3372–3377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doty SL, Shang TO, Wilson AM, Tangen J, Westergreen AD, Newman LA, Strand SE, Gordan MP (2000) Enhanced metabolism of halogenated hydrocarbons in transgenic plants containing mammalian cytochrome P450 2E1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6287–6291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edge JM, Benedict JH, Carroll JP, Reding HK (2001) Bollgard Cotton: an assessment of global economic, environmental, and social benefits. J Cotton Sci 5:1–8Google Scholar
  24. Endo S, Kasahara T, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Ebinuma H (2001) The isopentyl transferase gene is effective as a selectable marker gene for plant transformation in tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum cv. Petite Havana SR1). Plant Cell Rep 20:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Engel KH, Frenzl T, Miller A (2002) Current and future benefits from the use of GM technology in food production. Toxicol Lett 127:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferber D (1999) GM crops in the cross hairs: Science 28:1662–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher R, Twyman RM, Schillberg S (2003) Production of antibodies in plants and their use for global health. Vaccine 21:820–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fitter A, Perrins J, Williamson M (1990) Weed probability challenged. Biotechnology 8:473Google Scholar
  29. French CE, Rosser SJ, Davies GJ, Nicklin S, Bruce NC (1999) Biodegradation of explosives by transgenic plants expressing pentaerythritol tetranitrate reductase. Nat Biotechnol 17:491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuchs RL, Astwood JD (1996) Allergenicity assessment of foods derived from genetically modified plants. Food Technol 50:83–88Google Scholar
  31. Garcia S, Ezcurra E, Schoel B, Acevedo F, Soberon J, Snow AA (2005) Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 35:12338–12343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gelvin SB (2005) Gene exchange by design. Nature 433:583–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilissen LJW, Metz PLJ, Stiekema WJ, Nap JP (1998) Biosafety of E. coli β-glucuronidase (GUS) in plants. Transgenic Res 7:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Govil S (2004) Biotechnology for environmentally sustainable development. Adv Biotech 200:415–417Google Scholar
  35. Graff GD, Wright BD, Bennett AB, Zilberman D (2004) Access to intellectual property is a major obstacle to developing transgenic horticultural crops. Calif Agric 58:120–126Google Scholar
  36. Halpin C (2005) Genes stacking in transgeneic plants—the challenge for 21st century plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol J 3:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harper BK, Mabon SA, Leffel SM, Halfhill MD, Richards HA, Moyer KA, Stewart CN (1999) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for expression of a second gene in transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 17:1125–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrison LA, Bailey MR, Naylor MW, Ream JE, Hammond BG, Nida DL, Burnette BL, Nickson TE, Mitsky TA, Taylor TA, Fuchs RL, Padgette SR (1996) The expressed protein in glyphosate-tolerant soybean, 5-enolpyruvylshikinate-3-phosphase synthase from Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4 is rapidly digested in vitro and is not toxic to acutely gavaged mice. J Nutr 126:728–740Google Scholar
  39. Heritage J (2004) The fate of transgenes in the human gut. Nat Biotechnol 22:170–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hernandez M, Duplan MN, Berthier G, Vaitilingom M, Hauser W, Freyer R, Pla M, Bertheau Y (2004) Development and comparison of four real-time polymerase chain reaction systems for specific detection and quantification of Zea mays L. J Agric Food Chem 52:4632–4637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F (1998) Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 27:480–487Google Scholar
  42. Huang J, Pray C, Rozelle S (2002) Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature 418:678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ISB News Report (2001) Genetically modified crops and foods: a report of the AMA Council on scientific affairs. (http://www.isb.vt.edu/news/2001/Jan01.pdf)
  44. Jaffe G (2005) Withering on the vine will agricultural Biotech’s promises bear fruit? (Center For Science in the Public interest. Washington, DC 2005). (http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/withering_on_the_vine.pdf)
  45. Janmaat AF, Myers J (2003) Rapid evolution and the cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in greenhouse populations of cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2263–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. James JS (2004) Consumer knowledge and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology vary. Calif Agric 58:99–105Google Scholar
  47. Jennings JC, Albee LD, Kolwyck DC, Surber ML, Taylor ML, Hartnell GF, Lirette RP, Glenn KC (2003a) Attempts to detect transgenic and endogenous plant DNA and transgenic protein in muscle from broilers fed yieldgard corn borer corn. Poult Sci 82:371–380Google Scholar
  48. Jennings JC, Kolwyck DC, Kays SB, Whetsell, AJ, Surber JB, Cromwell GL, Lirette RP, Glenn KC (2003b) Determining whether transgenic and endogenous plant DNA and transgenic protein are detectable in muscle from swine fed Roundup Ready soybean meal. J Anim Sci 81:1447–1455Google Scholar
  49. Joersbo M, Donaldson I, Kreiberg J, Peterson SG, Brunstedt J (1998) Analysis of mannose selection used for transformation of sugarbeet. Mol Breed 4:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones L (1999) Science, medicine and the future. Genetically modified foods. BMJ 318:581–584Google Scholar
  51. Khanna M, Stotzky G (1992) Transformation of Bacillus subtilis by DNA bound on montmorillonite and effect of DNase on the transforming ability of bound DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1930–1939Google Scholar
  52. Kilian A, Keese PK, Jefferson RA (1999) Microbial genes for secreted β-glucuronidases, gene products and uses thereof. WO1999/019217Google Scholar
  53. Konig A, Cockburn A, Crevel RWR, Debruyne E, Grafstroem R, Hammerling U, Kimber I, Knudsen I, Kuiper HA, Peijnenburg AACM, Penninks AH, Poulsen M, Schauzu M, Wal JM (2004) Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1047–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Koprek T, McElory D, Louwerse J, Carrier Williams R (1999) Negative selection systems for transgenic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): comparison of bacterial codA- and cytochrome P450 gene-mediated selection. Plant J 19:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leffel SM, Mabon SA, Stewart CN Jr (1997) Application of green fluorescent protein in plants. Biotechniques 23:912–918Google Scholar
  56. Lopez-Juez E, Jarvis RP, Takeuchi A, Page AM, Choury J (1998) New Arabidopsis cue mutants suggest a close connection between plastid and phytochrome-regulation of nuclear gene expression. Plant Physiol 118:803–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W (1987) Adsorption of DNA to sand and variable degradation rates of adsorbed DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2948–2952Google Scholar
  58. Lunello P, Mansilla C, Conci V, Ponz F (2004) Ultra-sensitive detection of two garlic potyvirus using a real-time fluorescent (Taqman) RT-PCR assay. J Virol Methods 118:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacKenzie D (2000) International Comparison of Regulatory frameworks For Food Products of Biotechnology. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee, p. 62 (http://www.cbaccccb.ca/documents/en/InternatComparisons_MacKenzie.pdf)
  60. Mason HS, Warzecha H, Mor T, Arntzen CJ (2002) Edible plant vaccines: applications for prophylactic and therapeutic molecular medicine. Trends Mol Med 8:324–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Markoulatos P, Siagakas N, Moncany M (2002) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: a practical approach. J Clin Lab Anal 16:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miki B, McHugh S (2004) Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety. J Biotechnol 107:193–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Monciardini P, Podini D, Marmiroli N (1998) Exotic gene expression in transgenic plants as a tool for monitoring environmental pollution. Chemosphere 37:2761–2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987) Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase catalysed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 155:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Naested H, Fennema M, Hao L, Andersen M, Janssen DB, Mundy J (1999) A bacterial haloalkane dehalogenase gene as a negative selectable marker in Arabidopsis. Plant J 18:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nap JP, Metz PLZ, Escaler M, Conner AJ (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part I. Overview of current status and regulations. Plant J 33:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Netherwood T, M Martín-Orúe S, G O’Donnell A, Gockling S, Graham J, Mathers JC, Gilbert HJ (2004) Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract. Nat Biotechnol 22:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nordlee JA, Taylor ST, Townsend JA, Thomas LA, Bush RK (1996) Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybean. N Engl J Med 334:688–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ow DW (2001) The right chemistry for marker gene removal? Nat Biotechnol 19:115–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ow DW, Wood KV, DeLuca M, De Wet JR, Helilnsk, DR, Howell SH (1986) Transient and stable expression of the firefly luciferase gene in plant cells and transgenic plants. Science 234:856–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pereira A (2000) A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics. Transgenic Res 9:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Perr HA (2002) Children and genetically engineered food: potentials and problems. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35:475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pew Initiative on food and Biotechnology (2004) Issues in the regulation of genetically engineered plants and animals. (Washington, DC 2004). (http://pewagbiotech.org/research/regulation/Regulation.pdf)
  74. Randy V (2001) Plant biotechnology. Biotechnology information. Virginia cooperative extension. (http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/biotech/443-004/443-004.pdf)
  75. Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J Appl Ecol 30:199–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Redenbaugh K, McHughen A (2004) Regulatory challenges reduce opportunities for horticultural biotechnology. Calif Agric 58:106–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Regal PJ (1994) Scientific principles for ecologically based risk assessment of transgenic organisms. Mol Ecol 3:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rissler J, Mellon M (1993) Perils amidst the promise: ecological risks of transgenic crops in a global market. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  79. Romanowsky G, Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W (1993) Use of polymerase chain reaction and electorporation of Escherichia coli to monitor the persistence of extracellular plasmid DNA introduced into natural soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3438–3446Google Scholar
  80. Rommens CM, Humara JM, Ye JS, Yan H, Richael C, Zhang L, Perry R, Swords K (2004) Crop improvement through modification of the plant’s own genome. Plant Physiol 35:421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rudi K, Rudi I, Holck A (2003) A novel multiplex quantitative DNA array based on PCR (MQDA-PCR) for quantification of transgenic maize in food and feed. Nucleic Acids Res 31:11–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rugh CL (2004) Genetically engineered phytoremediation: one man’s trash is another man’s transgene. Trends Biotechnol 22:496–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (1999) Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature 402:480Google Scholar
  84. Schoenly KG, Cohen MB, Barrion AT, Zhang W, Gaolach B, Viajante VD (2003) Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on non-target herbivore and natural enemy assemblages in tropical irrigated rice. Environ Biosafety Res 2:181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stave JW (2002) Protein immunoassay methods for detection of biotech crops: applications, limitations, and practical considerations. J AOAC Int 85:780–786Google Scholar
  86. Stewart CN Jr, Harold A, Richards IV, Matthew HD (2000) Transgenic plants and biosafety: science, misconceptions and public perceptions. Biotechniques 29:832–843Google Scholar
  87. Stougaard J (1993) Substrate-dependent negative selection in plants using a bacterial cytosine deaminase gene. Plant J 3:755–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stull D (2001) A feast of fluorescence. Scientist 15:20–21Google Scholar
  89. Tabashnik BE (1994) Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:47–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tabashnik BE, Liu YB, Malvar T, Heckel DG, Masson L, Ballester V, Granero F, Mensua JL, Ferre J (1997) Global variation in the genetic and biochemical basis of diamondback moth resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12780–12785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trifa Y, Zhang D (2004) DNA content in embryo and endosperm of Maize kernel (Zea mays L): impact on GMO quantification. J Agric Food Chem 52:1044–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. UK GM Science Review Panel (2003) GM Science Review. First Report. An open Review of the Science relevant to GM crops and food based on interests and concerns of the public (UK Government, London, 2003). (http://www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk/report/pdf/gmsci-report1-full.pdf)
  93. Wilson FD, Flint HM, Deaton WR, Buehler RE (1994) Yield, yield components, and fiber properties of insect-resistant cotton lines containing a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin gene. Crop Sci 34:38–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yan L, Kerr PS (2002) Genetically engineered crops: their potential use for improvement of human nutrition. Nutr Rev 60:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Om V. Singh
    • 1
  • Shivani Ghai
    • 2
  • Debarati Paul
    • 2
  • Rakesh K. Jain
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsThe John Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Microbial TechnologyChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations