Hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides strain O.U.001 using spent media of Enterobacter cloacae strain DM11
- 508 Downloads
Combined dark and photo-fermentation was carried out to study the feasibility of biological hydrogen production. In dark fermentation, hydrogen was produced by Enterobacter cloacae strain DM11 using glucose as substrate. This was followed by a photo-fermentation process. Here, the spent medium from the dark process (containing unconverted metabolites, mainly acetic acid etc.) underwent photo-fermentation by Rhodobacter sphaeroides strain O.U.001 in a column photo-bioreactor. This combination could achieve higher yields of hydrogen by complete utilization of the chemical energy stored in the substrate. Dark fermentation was studied in terms of several process parameters, such as initial substrate concentration, initial pH of the medium and temperature, to establish favorable conditions for maximum hydrogen production. Also, the effects of the threshold concentration of acetic acid, light intensity and the presence of additional nitrogen sources in the spent effluent on the amount of hydrogen produced during photo-fermentation were investigated. The light conversion efficiency of hydrogen was found to be inversely proportional to the incident light intensity. In a batch system, the yield of hydrogen in the dark fermentation was about 1.86 mol H2 mol−1 glucose; and the yield in the photo-fermentation was about 1.5–1.72 mol H2 mol−1 acetic acid. The overall yield of hydrogen in the combined process, considering glucose as the preliminary substrate, was found to be higher than that in a single process.
KeywordsSpend Medium Rhodobacter Sphaeroides Dark Fermentation Gross Calorific Value Total Volatile Fatty Acid
The financial support of the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, to carry out this project is gratefully acknowledged.
- Kim JS, Ito K, Takahashi H (1980) The relationship between nitrogenase activity and hydrogen evolution in Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Agric Biol Chem 44:827–833Google Scholar
- Kim MS, Moon KW, Lee SK (2001) Hydrogen production from food processing waste water and sewage sludge by anaerobic dark fermentation combined with photofermentation. In: Miyake J, et al (eds) Biohydrogen II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 263–272Google Scholar
- Lee CM, Chen PC, Wang CC, Tung YC (2002) Photohydrogen production using purple non-sulfur bacteria with hydrogen fermentation reactor effluent. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27:1308–1314Google Scholar
- Markov SA, Bazin MJ, Hall DO (1996) Efficiency of light energy conversion in hydrogen production by cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis. J Mar Biotechnol 4:57–60Google Scholar
- Oh Y-K, Seol E-H, Kim MS, Park S (2004) Photoproduction of hydrogen from acetate by a chemoheterotrophic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris P4. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:1115–1121Google Scholar
- Reith JH, Wijffels RH, Barten H (2003) Biomethane and biohydrogen—status and perspective of biological methane and hydrogen production. Dutch Bio-Hydrogen Foundation, Rotterdam, pp 118–125Google Scholar
- Tredici MR, Chini Zittelli G, Benemann JR (1998) A tubular integral gas exchange photobioreactor for biological hydrogen production. In: Zaborsky OR (ed) Biohydrogen. Plenum, London, pp 391–401Google Scholar
- Yamada A, Hatano T, Matsunaga T (1998) Coversion efficiencies of light energy to hydrogen by a novel Rhodovulum sp. and its uptake-hydrogenase mutant. In: Zaborsky OR (ed) Biohydrogen. Plenum, London, pp 167–171Google Scholar
- Yokoi H, Mori S, Hirose J, Hayashi S, Takasaki Y (1998) H2 production from starch by a mixed culture of Clostridium butyricum and Rhodobacter sp. M-19. Biotechol Lett 20:890–895Google Scholar
- Zumft WG, Korner H, Arp DJ, Klipp W, Puhler A (1985) Nitrogen fixation in the anoxygenic phototropic bacteria. Proc FEBS Congr 16:411–424Google Scholar