Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol

Mini-Review

Abstract

Ethanol has been utilized as a fuel source in the United States since the turn of the century. However, it has repeatedly faced significant commercial viability obstacles relative to petroleum. Renewed interest exists in ethanol as a fuel source today owing to its positive impact on rural America, the environment and United States energy security. Today, most fuel ethanol is produced by either the dry grind or the wet mill process. Current technologies allow for 2.5 gallons (wet mill process) to 2.8 gallons (dry grind process) of ethanol (1 gallon = 3.785 l) per bushel of corn. Valuable co-products, distillers dried grains with solubles (dry grind) and corn gluten meal and feed (wet mill), are also generated in the production of ethanol. While current supplies are generated from both processes, the majority of the growth in the industry is from dry grind plant construction in rural communities across the corn belt. While fuel ethanol production is an energy-efficient process today, additional research is occurring to improve its long-term economic viability. Three of the most significant areas of research are in the production of hybrids with a higher starch content or a higher extractable starch content, in the conversion of the corn kernel fiber fraction to ethanol, and in the identification and development of new and higher-value co-products.

References

  1. Anderson B (2003) Targeting total growth. Ethanol Prod Mag 2003:38–40Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1981) Fuel alcohol: an energy alternative for the 1980s. National Alcohol Fuels Commission, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1999) Ethanol industry outlook 1999 and beyond. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Bothast RJ, Nichols NN, Dien BS (1999) Fermentations with new recombinant organisms. Biotechnol Prog 15:867–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan T (2003a) DDGS standardization: smart idea futile idealism. Ethanol Prod Mag 2003:24–26Google Scholar
  6. Bryan T (2003b) Pioneer ‘rapid assay’ identifies hybrids for above-average ethanol production potential. Ethanol Prod Mag 2003:36–38Google Scholar
  7. Butzen S, Haefele D, Hillard P (2003) Corn processing II: dry grind ethanol production, 13. Pioneer Hybrid International, JohnstonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheryan M (2002) Corn oil and protein extraction method. US Patent 6433146Google Scholar
  9. Craig JA, Batie J, Chen W, Freeland SB, Kinkima M, Lanahan MB (2004) Expression of starch hydrolyzing enzymes in corn. In: Tumbleson M (ed) Corn: feedstock of the future. (Corn utilization and technology conference proceedings) Corn Utilization and Technology, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  10. DiPardo J (2000) Outlook for biomass ethanol production and demand. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Grohmann K, Bothast RJ (1997) Saccharification of corn fiber by combined treatment with dilute sulphuric acid and enzymes. Process Biochem 32:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gulati M, Kohlmann K, Ladisch MR, Hespell RB, Bothast RJ (1996) Assessment of ethanol production options for corn products. Bioresour Technol 58:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hespell RB, O’Bryan PJ, Moniruzzaman M, Bothast RJ (1997) Hydrolysis by commercial enzyme mixtures of AFEX-treated corn fiber and isolated xylans. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 62:87–97Google Scholar
  14. Hunt DV (1981) The gasohol handbook, Industrial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston DB, Singh V, Eckhoff SR (2003) Use of enzymes to reduce steep time and SO2 requirements in a maize wet milling process. US patent 6566125Google Scholar
  16. Kovarik B (1998) Henry Ford, Charles F. Kettering and the fuel of the future. Automot Hist Rev 32:7–27Google Scholar
  17. Leathers TD (1998) Upgrading fuel ethanol coproducts. SIM News 48:210–217Google Scholar
  18. Merino ST, Cherry JR (2004) Summary of progress on DOE-supported cellulose research for the production of glucose from cellulosic biomass. In: Tumbleson M (ed) Corn: feedstock of the future. (Corn utilization and technology conference proceedings) Corn Utilization and Technology, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Bryan K (2004) Agronomic management of corn grain starch for ethanol and high extractable starch production. American Society of Agronomy, MolineGoogle Scholar
  20. Shapouri HJ, Duffield A, Graboski MS (1996) Energy balance of corn ethanol revisited. In: ASAE (ed) Conference proceedings liquid fuel conference. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 253–259Google Scholar
  21. Shapouri HJ, Duffield J, McAloon A, Wang M (2004) The 2001 Net Energy Balance of Corn-Ethanol. In: Tumbleson M (ed) Corn: feedstock of the future. (Corn utilization and technology conference proceedings) Corn Utilization and Technology, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh V, Eckhoff SR (1996) Effect of soak time, soak temperature and lactic acid on germ recovery parameters. Cereal Chem 73:716–720Google Scholar
  23. Singh V, Moreau RA, Doner LW, Eckhoff SR, Hicks KB (1999) Recovery of fiber in the corn dry grind ethanol process: a feedstock for valuable coproducts. Cereal Chem 76:868–872Google Scholar
  24. Wang M, Saricks C, Wu M (1997) Fuel-cycle fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of fuel ethanol produced from U.S. midwest corn. Argonne National Laboratory for Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs, ArgonneGoogle Scholar
  25. Wyman CE (2003) Applications of corn stover and fiber. In: White PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Corn chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, pp723–750Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Corn-To-Ethanol Research CenterSouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations