Community structure of microbial biofilms associated with membrane-based water purification processes as revealed using a polyphasic approach
- 643 Downloads
The microbial communities of membrane biofilms occurring in two full-scale water purification processes employing microfiltration (MF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were characterized using a polyphasic approach that employed bacterial cultivation, 16S rDNA clone library and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. All methods showed that the α-Proteobacteria was the largest microbial fraction in the samples, followed by the γ-Proteobacteria. This suggested that members of these two groups could be responsible for the biofouling on the membranes studied. Furthermore, the microbial community structures between the MF and RO samples were considerably different in composition of the most predominant 16S rDNA clones and bacterial isolates from the α-Proteobacteria and only shared two common groups (Bradyrhizobium, Bosea) out of more than 17 different bacterial groups observed. The MF and RO samples further contained Planctomycetes and Fibroacter/Acidobacteria as the second predominant bacterial clones, respectively, and differed in minor bacterial clones and isolates. The community structure differences were mainly attributed to differences in feed water, process configurations and operating environments, such as the pressure and hydrodynamic conditions present in the water purification systems.
KeywordsClone Library Reverse Osmosis Microbial Community Structure Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Reverse Osmosis Membrane
This work was supported by a NUS grant to W.T.L.
- Amann RI (1995) In situ identification of microorganisms by whole cell hybridisation with rRNA-targeted nucleic acid probes. In: Akkerman ADL, Elsas JD van, Bruijn FJ de (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual. Kluwyer, Dordrecht, pp 1–15Google Scholar
- Dudley LY, Christopher NSJ (1999) Practical experiences of biofouling in reverse osmosis systems. In: Keevil CW, Godfree A, Holt D, Dow C (eds) Biofilms in Aquatic Environment. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, pp 101–159Google Scholar
- Gilbert P, Brown MRW (1995) Phenotypic plasticity and mechanisms of protection of bacterial biofilms from antimicrobial agents. In: Lappin-Scott HE, Costerton JW (eds) Microbial biofilms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 118–132Google Scholar
- Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
- Kumar S, Tomura K, Nei M (1993) MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, ver 1.0. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.Google Scholar
- LeChavellier MW, Babcock TM, Lee RG (1987) Examination and characterisation of distribution system biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3803–3815Google Scholar
- Liu W-T, Stahl DA (2001) Molecular approaches for the measurement of density, diversity, and phylogeny. In: Hurst CJ, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD, Walter MV (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C., pp 114–134Google Scholar
- Manz W, Amann RI, Ludwig W, Wagner M, Schleifer K-H (1992) Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of Proteobacteria: problems and solutions. Syst Appl Microbiol 15:593–600Google Scholar
- Ridgway HF, Flemming H-C (1996) Membrane biofouling. In: Mallevialle J, Odendaal PE, Weisner MR (eds) Water treatment membrane processes. McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, pp 6.1–6.62Google Scholar