Constraints on haplotype structure and variable gene frequencies suggest a functional hierarchy within cattle MHC class I
- 314 Downloads
Six major histocompatibility complex (MHC) classical class I genes have been identified in cattle, and up to three of these are expressed in variable combinations on different haplotypes. The origin and functional significance of this genetic complexity is unknown. However, an improved assembly of the cattle genome, an expanded database of full-length cDNA sequences and high-resolution frequency data concerning expressed class I genes in an economically important cattle breed combine to provide a new opportunity to study the significance of cattle MHC class I diversity. Analysis of these new data supports assignment of alleles to six discrete genes and further shows that all these classical genes share a common ancestor with a single non-classical gene, NC1. While haplotype structure is variable, with thirteen gene configurations identified, there are nevertheless clear constraints relating to both the number and combination of genes. Haplotypes expressing two classical genes are most frequently observed, and the classical class I gene 2 is almost invariably present. The frequency data support the dominance of gene 2, showing that close to 100 % of individuals carry at least one copy. This indicates a hierarchy in the functional importance of particular genes and haplotype structures. Haplotype frequency in cattle populations is therefore likely to impact on differential disease susceptibilities. This knowledge will be important for development of informed breeding strategies aimed at increasing the ability of cattle to survive in the face of future unpredictable pathogen exposure.
KeywordsCattle MHC class I genes Haplotype diversity MHC gene frequency Holstein–Friesian
This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK (BBSRC) including grant (BBS/E/I/00001410).
- Archibald SD (2002) Analysis and mapping of the bovine MHC class I region. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
- Beja-Pereira A, Caramelli D, Lalueza-Fox C, Vernesi C, Ferrand N, Casoli A, Goyache F, Royo LJ, Conti S, Lari M, Martini A, Ouragh L, Magid A, Atash A, Zsolnai A, Boscato P, Triantaphylidis C, Ploumi K, Sineo L, Mallegni F, Taberlet P, Erhardt G, Sampietro L, Bertranpetit J, Barbujani G, Luikart G, Bertorelle G (2006) The origin of European cattle: evidence from modern and ancient DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(21):8113–8118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Codner GF (2010) Assessing MHC class I diversity in dairy cattle populations. PhD thesis, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
- Codner GF, Stear MJ, Reeve R, Matthews L, Ellis SA (2011) Selective forces shaping diversity in the class I region of the major histocompatibility complex in dairy cattle. Anim Genet. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02239.x
- Davies CJ, Joosten I, Bernoco D, Arriens MA, Bester J, Ceriotti G, Ellis S, Hensen EJ, Hines HC, Horin P et al (1994) Polymorphism of bovine MHC class I genes. Joint report of the Fifth International Bovine Lymphocyte Antigen (BoLA) Workshop, Interlaken, Switzerland, 1 August 1992. Eur J Immunogenet 21(4):239–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goddeeris BM, Morrison WI, Teale AJ, Bensaid A, Baldwin CL (1986) Bovine cytotoxic T-cell clones specific for cells infected with the protozoan parasite Theileria parva: parasite strain specificity and class I major histocompatibility complex restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83(14):5238–5242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graham SP, Pellé R, Yamage M, Mwangi DM, Honda Y, Mwakubambanya RS, de Villiers EP, Abuya E, Awino E, Gachanja J, Mbwika F, Muthiani AM, Muriuki C, Nyanjui JK, Onono FO, Osaso J, Riitho V, Saya RM, Ellis SA, McKeever DJ, MacHugh ND, Gilbert SC, Audonnet JC, Morrison WI, van der Bruggen P, Taracha EL (2008) Characterization of the fine specificity of bovine CD8 T-cell responses to defined antigens from the protozoan parasite Theileria parva. Infect Immun 76(2):685–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kristensen TN, Sorensen AC (2005) Inbreeding—lessons from animal breeding, evolutionary biology and conservation genetics. Anim Sci 80:121–133Google Scholar
- Macdonald IK, Harkiolaki M, Hunt L, Connelley T, Carroll AV, MacHugh ND, Graham SP, Jones EY, Morrison WI, Flower DR, Ellis SA (2010) MHC class I bound to an immunodominant Theileria parva epitope demonstrates unconventional presentation to T cell receptors. PloS Pathog 6(10):e1001149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacHugh ND, Connelley T, Graham SP, Pelle R, Formisano P, Taracha EL, Ellis SA, McKeever DJ, Burrells A, Morrison WI (2009) CD8+ T-cell responses to Theileria parva are preferentially directed to a single dominant antigen: Implications for parasite strain-specific immunity. Eur J Immunol 39(9):2459–2469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Narciandi F, Lloyd AT, Chapwanya A, C OF, Meade KG (2011) Reproductive tissue-specific expression profiling and genetic variation across a 19 gene bovine beta-defensin cluster. Immunogenetics 63:641–651Google Scholar