Porcine major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules and analysis of their peptide-binding specificities
In all vertebrate animals, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are controlled by major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules. These are highly polymorphic peptide receptors selecting and presenting endogenously derived epitopes to circulating CTLs. The polymorphism of the MHC effectively individualizes the immune response of each member of the species. We have recently developed efficient methods to generate recombinant human MHC-I (also known as human leukocyte antigen class I, HLA-I) molecules, accompanying peptide-binding assays and predictors, and HLA tetramers for specific CTL staining and manipulation. This has enabled a complete mapping of all HLA-I specificities (“the Human MHC Project”). Here, we demonstrate that these approaches can be applied to other species. We systematically transferred domains of the frequently expressed swine MHC-I molecule, SLA-1*0401, onto a HLA-I molecule (HLA-A*11:01), thereby generating recombinant human/swine chimeric MHC-I molecules as well as the intact SLA-1*0401 molecule. Biochemical peptide-binding assays and positional scanning combinatorial peptide libraries were used to analyze the peptide-binding motifs of these molecules. A pan-specific predictor of peptide–MHC-I binding, NetMHCpan, which was originally developed to cover the binding specificities of all known HLA-I molecules, was successfully used to predict the specificities of the SLA-1*0401 molecule as well as the porcine/human chimeric MHC-I molecules. These data indicate that it is possible to extend the biochemical and bioinformatics tools of the Human MHC Project to other vertebrate species.
KeywordsRecombinant MHC Peptide specificity Binding predictions
We thank Lise Lotte Bruun Nielsen, Anne Caroline Schmiegelow, and Iben Sara Pedersen for their expert experimental support. This work was in part supported by the Danish Council for Independent Research, Technology and Production Sciences (274-09-0281) and by the National Institute of Health (NIH) (HHSN266200400025C).
- Ferre H, Ruffet E, Blicher T, Sylvester-Hvid C, Nielsen LL, Hobley TJ, Thomas OR, Buus S (2003) Purification of correctly oxidized MHC class I heavy-chain molecules under denaturing conditions: a novel strategy exploiting disulfide assisted protein folding. Protein Sci 12:551–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larsen MV, Lundegaard C, Lamberth K, Buus S, Brunak S, Lund O, Nielsen M (2005) An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: a combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions. Eur J Immunol 35:2295–2303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pedersen LO, Stryhn A, Holter TL, Etzerodt M, Gerwien J, Nissen MH, Thogersen HC, Buus S (1995) The interaction of beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2m) with mouse class I major histocompatibility antigens and its ability to support peptide binding. A comparison of human and mouse beta 2m. Eur J Immunol 25:1609–1616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rapin N, Hoof I, Lund O, Nielsen M (2010) The MHC motif viewer: a visualization tool for MHC binding motifs. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. Chapter 18:Unit 18.17Google Scholar
- Stryhn A, Pedersen LO, Romme T, Holm CB, Holm A, Buus S (1996) Peptide binding specificity of major histocompatibility complex class I resolved into an array of apparently independent subspecificities: quantitation by peptide libraries and improved prediction of binding. Eur J Immunol 26:1911–1918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar