NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans
Binding of peptides to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is the single most selective step in the recognition of pathogens by the cellular immune system. The human MHC genomic region (called HLA) is extremely polymorphic comprising several thousand alleles, each encoding a distinct MHC molecule. The potentially unique specificity of the majority of HLA alleles that have been identified to date remains uncharacterized. Likewise, only a limited number of chimpanzee and rhesus macaque MHC class I molecules have been characterized experimentally. Here, we present NetMHCpan-2.0, a method that generates quantitative predictions of the affinity of any peptide–MHC class I interaction. NetMHCpan-2.0 has been trained on the hitherto largest set of quantitative MHC binding data available, covering HLA-A and HLA-B, as well as chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, gorilla, and mouse MHC class I molecules. We show that the NetMHCpan-2.0 method can accurately predict binding to uncharacterized HLA molecules, including HLA-C and HLA-G. Moreover, NetMHCpan-2.0 is demonstrated to accurately predict peptide binding to chimpanzee and macaque MHC class I molecules. The power of NetMHCpan-2.0 to guide immunologists in interpreting cellular immune responses in large out-bred populations is demonstrated. Further, we used NetMHCpan-2.0 to predict potential binding peptides for the pig MHC class I molecule SLA-1*0401. Ninety-three percent of the predicted peptides were demonstrated to bind stronger than 500 nM. The high performance of NetMHCpan-2.0 for non-human primates documents the method’s ability to provide broad allelic coverage also beyond human MHC molecules. The method is available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetMHCpan.
KeywordsMHC class I Binding specificity Non-human primates Artificial neural networks CTL epitopes
This work was supported by the NIH (contracts HHSN266200400025C, HHSN266200400083C, and HHSN26620040006C).
- Brusic V, Rudy G, Harrison LC (1994) Prediction of MHC binding peptides using artificial neural networks. In: a. Y. X. Stonier RJ (ed) Complex systems: mechanism of adaptation. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 253–260Google Scholar
- Buus S, Lauemoller SL, Worning P, Kesmir C, Frimurer T, Corbet S, Fomsgaard A, Hilden J, Holm A, Brunak S (2003) Sensitive quantitative predictions of peptide–MHC binding by a ‘Query by Committee’ artificial neural network approach. Tissue Antigens 62:378–384 doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00112.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferre H, Ruffet E, Blicher T, Sylvester-Hvid C, Nielsen LL, Hobley TJ, Thomas OR, Buus S (2003) Purification of correctly oxidized MHC class I heavy-chain molecules under denaturing conditions: a novel strategy exploiting disulfide assisted protein folding. Protein Sci 12:551–559 doi: 10.1110/ps.0233003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frahm N, Yusim K, Suscovich TJ, Adams S, Sidney J, Hraber P, Hewitt HS, Linde CH, Kavanagh DG, Woodberry T, Henry LM, Faircloth K, Listgarten J, Kadie C, Jojic N, Sango K, Brown NV, Pae E, Zaman MT, Bihl F, Khatri A, John M, Mallal S, Marincola FM, Walker BD, Sette A, Heckerman D, Korber BT, Brander C (2007) Extensive HLA class I allele promiscuity among viral CTL epitopes. Eur J Immunol 37:2419–2433 doi: 10.1002/eji.200737365 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mamitsuka H (1998) Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of hidden Markov models. Proteins 33:460–474 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981201)33:4<460::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-M PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Blicher T, Lamberth K, Harndahl M, Justesen S, Roder G, Peters B, Sette A, Lund O, Buus S (2007) NetMHCpan, a method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence. PLoS One 2:e796 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000796 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Rapin N, Hoof I, Lund O, Nielsen M (2008) MHC motif viewer. Immunogenetics, Sep 3 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Sette A, Sidney J, Bui HH, del Guercio MF, Alexander J, Loffredo J, Watkins DI, Mothe BR (2005b) Characterization of the peptide-binding specificity of Mamu-A*11 results in the identification of SIV-derived epitopes and interspecies cross-reactivity. Immunogenetics 57:53–68 doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0749-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sidney J, Asabe S, Peters B, Purton KA, Chung J, Pencille TJ, Purcell R, Walker CM, Chisari FV, Sette A (2006) Detailed characterization of the peptide binding specificity of five common Patr class I MHC molecules. Immunogenetics 58:559–570 doi: 10.1007/s00251-006-0131-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sylvester-Hvid C, Kristensen N, Blicher T, Ferre H, Lauemoller SL, Wolf XA, Lamberth K, Nissen MH, Pedersen LO, Buus S (2002) Establishment of a quantitative ELISA capable of determining peptide–MHC class I interaction. Tissue Antigens 59:251–258 doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2002.590402.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tenzer S, Peters B, Bulik S, Schoor O, Lemmel C, Schatz MM, Kloetzel PM, Rammensee HG, Schild H, Holzhutter HG (2005) Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC class I binding. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:1025–1037 doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-4528-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar