, Volume 58, Issue 5–6, pp 390–395

Isolation and characterization of a MHC class II DRB locus in the European water vole (Arvicola terrestris)

Original Paper


In so-called model species, such as human and mouse, genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) are characterized by extremely high levels of polymorphism, and it is considered that such diversity is maintained by balancing selection. `There is now a recognized need to expand studies into nonmodel species to examine whether high MHC diversity is mirrored in natural populations, and to determine the ecological, ethological, and evolutionary processes that underpin balancing selection. To address such issues, a necessary prerequisite is the ability to characterize diversity at a single, expressed, polymorphic MHC locus on which selection may be acting. Here, we provide the first description of allelic diversity at exon 2 of an MHC class II DRB locus in the European water vole (Arvicola terrestris), characterize variation across four natural populations, and test whether the patterns of variation are consistent with the effects of balancing selection. Using single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and subsequent DNA sequencing of gel excisions, five DRB alleles were resolved, each with a unique amino acid sequence, among 100 individuals from four geographically distinct populations. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed that the alleles were products from an expressed locus. Intra-allelic amino acid differences were high (10.5–33.3%), and the nonsynonymous substitution rate exceeded the synonymous substitution rate for the functional peptide-binding region (dN:dS=3.91 and P<0.005). Phylogenetic comparison of resolved alleles with closely related homologues indicated that each allele represented a unique lineage preserved across speciation events. These results indicate that balancing selection has maintained diversity of DRB allelic lineages and amino acid function over evolutionary time scales, but may be less effective at preserving alleles in contemporary populations where stochastic microevolutionary processes may dominate.


MHC class II Polymorphism Evolution Balancing selection Arvicola 


  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apanius V, Penn D, Slev PR, Ruff LR, Potts WK (1997) The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. CRC Crit Rev Immunol 17:179–224Google Scholar
  3. Bernatchez L, Landry C (2003) MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J Evol Biol 16:363–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen L, Aldridge BM, Gulland F, Van Bonn W, DeLong R, Melin S, Lowenstine LJ, Stott JL, Johnson ML (2004) Class II multiformity generated by variable MHC-DRB region configurations in the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Immunogenetics 56:12–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JH, Jardetzky TS, Gorga JC, Stern LJ, Urban RG, Strominger JL, Wiley DC (1993) 3-Dimensional structure of the human class-II histocompatibility antigen Hla-Dr1. Nature 364:33–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doxiadis GGM, Otting N, de Groot NG, Noort R, Bontrop RE (2000) Unprecedented polymorphism of Mhc-DRB region configurations in rhesus macaques. J Immunol 164:3193–3199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Doxiadis GGM, Otting N, de Groot NG, Bontrop RE (2001) Differential evolutionary MHC class II strategies in humans and rhesus macaques: relevance for biomedical studies. Immunol Rev 183:76–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards SV, Hedrick PW (1998) Evolution and ecology of MHC molecules: from genomics to sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egid K, Brown JL (1989) The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice. Anim Behav 38:548–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekblom R, Grahn M, Hoglund J (2003) Patterns of polymorphism in the MHC class II of a non-passerine bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Immunogenetics 54:734–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellegren H, Hartman G, Johansson M, Andersson L (1993) Major histocompatibility complex monomorphism and low levels of DNA fingerprinting variability in a reintroduced and rapidly expanding population of beavers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:8150–8153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellegren H, Mikko S, Wallin K, Andersson L (1996) Limited polymorphism at major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci in the Swedish moose A. alces. Mol Ecol 5:3–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence-limits on phylogenies—an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueroa F, Mayer WE, Sultmann H, O’hUigin C, Tichy H, Satta Y, Takezaki N, Takahata N, Klein J (2000) Mhc class IIB gene evolution in East African cichlid fishes. Immunogenetics 51:556–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Froeschke G, Sommer S (2005) MHC Class II DRB variability and parasite load in the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) in the Southern Kalahari. Mol Biol Evol 22:1254–1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garrigan D, Hedrick PN (2001) Class I MHC polymorphism and evolution in endangered California Chinook and other Pacific salmon. Immunogenetics 53:483–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrigan D, Hedrick PW (2003) Perspective: detecting adaptive molecular polymorphism: lessons from the MHC. Evolution 57:1707–1722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaudieri S, Dawkins RL, Habara K, Kulski JK, Gojobori T (2000) SNP profile within the human major histocompatibility complex reveals an extreme and interrupted level of nucleotide diversity. Genome Res 10:1579–1586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Go Y, Satta Y, Kawamoto Y, Rakotoarisoa G, Randrianjafy A, Koyama N, Hirai H (2002) Mhc-DRB genes evolution in lemurs. Immunogenetics 54:403–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harf R, Sommer S (2005) Association between major histocompatibility complex class II DRB alleles and parasite load in the hairy-footed gerbil, Gerbillurus paeba, in the southern Kalahari. Mol Ecol 14:85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein J (1980) Generation of diversity at MHC loci: implications for T-cell receptor repertoires. In: Fougereau M, Dausset J (eds) Immunology 80. Academic, London, pp 239–253Google Scholar
  22. Klein J (1986) Natural history of the major histocompatibility complex. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein J, Bontrop RE, Dawkins RL, Erlich HA, Gyllensten UB, Heise ER, Jones PP, Parham P, Wakeland EK, Watkins DI (1990) Nomenclature for the major histocompatibility complexes of different species—a proposal. Immunogenetics 31:217–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kriener K, O’hUigin C, Klein J (2000a) Alu elements support independent origin of prosimian, platyrrhine, and catarrhine Mhc-DRB genes. Genome Res 10:634–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kriener K, O’hUigin C, Tichy H, Klein J (2000b) Convergent evolution of major histocompatibility complex molecules in humans and New World monkeys. Immunogenetics 51:169–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambin X, Aars J, Piertney SB, Telfer S (2004) Inferring pattern and process in small mammal metapopulations: insights from ecological and genetic data. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Burlington, pp 515–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer-Lucht Y, Sommer S (2005) MHC diversity and the association to nematode parasitism in the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). Mol Ecol 14:2233–2243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muirhead CA (2001) Consequences of population structure on genes under balancing selection. Evolution 55:1532–1541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mullenbach R, Lagoda PJL, Welter C (1989) An efficient salt–chloroform extraction of DNA from blood and tissues. Trends Genet 5:391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Musolf K, Meyer-Lucht Y, Sommer S (2004) Evolution of MHC-DRB class II polymorphism in the genus Apodemus and a comparison of DRB sequences within the family Muridae (Mammalia: Rodentia). Immunogenetics 56:420–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3:418–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Nizetic D, Figueroa F, Dembic Z, Nevo E, Klein J (1987) Major Histocompatibility complex gene organization in the mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi: evidence for transfer of function between class II genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:5828–5832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piertney SB, Oliver MK (2006) The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 96:7–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schad J, Sommer S, Ganzhorn JU (2004) MHC variability of a small lemur in the littoral forest fragments of southeastern Madagascar. Conservation Genetics 5:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smulders MJM, Snoek LB, Booy G, Vosman B (2003) Complete loss of MHC genetic diversity in the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) population in The Netherlands. Consequences for conservation strategies. Conservation Genetics 4:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sommer S, Schwab D, Ganzhorn JU (2002) MHC diversity of endemic Malagasy rodents in relation to geographic range and social system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strachan C, Strachan R, Jeffries D (2000) Preliminary report on the changes of the water vole population of Britain as shown by the national survey of 1989–1990 and 1996–1998. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Mike V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J, Boyse J, Zayas ZA (1976) Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 144:1324–1335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuhki N, Beck T, Stephens RM, Nishigaki Y, Newmann K, O’Brien SJ (2003) Comparative genome organization of human, murine, and feline MHC class II region. Genome Res 13:1169–1179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zylstra P, Rothenfluh H, Weiller GF, Blanden RV, Steele EJ (1998) PCR amplification of murine immunoglobulin germline V genes: strategies for minimization of recombination artefacts. Immunol Cell Biol 76:395–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations