Immunogenetics

, Volume 56, Issue 10, pp 743–753 | Cite as

Identification and sequence analysis of chicken Toll-like receptors

  • Ahmet Yilmaz
  • Shixue Shen
  • David L. Adelson
  • Suresh Xavier
  • James J. Zhu
Original Paper

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play an important role in the recognition of microbial components. Only chicken TLR2 and -4 have been reported in the literature. The objectives of this study were to identify new chicken TLRs and to evaluate evolutionary significance of these receptors. Searching chicken genomic databases and DNA sequencing revealed five new TLRs, TLR1 (type 1 and 2), -3, -5, and -7. No chicken orthologues of mammalian TLR8, -9, or -10 were found. As in mammals, all chicken TLRs (chTLRs) share identical protein secondary structure that consists of several leucine-rich domains, a transmembrane domain, and Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor domain(s). Phylogenetic analyses indicate that the identified chTLR genes are the orthologues of TLRs in mammals. Analyses of the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site and nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site indicate that the nucleotide sequences coding for the leucine-rich repeats of chicken TLR1 type 1 and type 2 were significantly under positive Darwinian selection. In contrast, the sequences of other TLRs were under purifying selection. These results support the hypothesis that one of the major evolutionary strategies of the innate immune system is to recognize a few highly conserved microbial components with several conserved TLRs. The results also indicate that the sequence changes in the ligand-binding domains of TLR1 in chickens provide adaptive advantages during evolution.

Keywords

Toll-like receptors Chicken Positive selection Purifying selection Comparative genomics 

References

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton GM, Medzhitov R (2002) Control of adaptive immune responses by Toll-like receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 14:380–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beutler B, Rehli M (2002) Evolution of the TIR, tolls and TLRs: functional inferences from computational biology. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 270:1–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881–10890PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Filip L, Mundy NI (2004) Rapid evolution by positive Darwinian selection in the extracellular domain of the abundant lymphocyte protein CD45 in primates. Mol Biol Evol 21:1504–1511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukui A, Inoue N, Matsumoto M, Nomura M, Yamada K, Matsuda Y, Toyoshima K, Seya T (2001) Molecular cloning and functional characterization of chicken toll-like receptors. A single chicken toll covers multiple molecular patterns. J Biol Chem 276:47143–47149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hughes AL, Nei M (1988) Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335:167–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hughes AL, Yeager M (1998) Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. Annu Rev Genet 32:415–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Janssens S, Beyaert R (2003) Role of Toll-like receptors in pathogen recognition. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:637–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiggins FM, Hurst GD (2003) The evolution of parasite recognition genes in the innate immune system: purifying selection on Drosophila melanogaster peptidoglycan recognition proteins. J Mol Evol 57:598–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA (1996) The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86:973–983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Letunic I, Copley RR, Schmidt S, Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, Schultz J, Ponting CP, Bork P (2004) SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Res 32(1):D142–D144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leveque G, Forgetta V, Morroll S, Smith AL, Bumstead N, Barrow P, Loredo-Osti JC, Morgan K, Malo D (2003) Allelic variation in TLR4 is linked to susceptibility to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in chickens. Infect Immun 71:1116–1124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Li WH (1997) Molecular evolution. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Medzhitov R (2001) Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 1:135–145Google Scholar
  16. Takeda K, Akira S (2003) Toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 21:335–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tanaka T, Nei M (1989) Positive Darwinian selection observed at the variable-region genes of immunoglobulins. Mol Biol Evol 6:447–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Underhill DM, Ozinsky A (2002) Phagocytosis of microbes: complexity in action. Annu Rev Immunol 20:825–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Urdahl KB, Sun JC, Bevan MJ (2002) Positive selection of MHC class Ib-restricted CD8(+) T cells on hematopoietic cells. Nat Immunol 3:772–779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Xie H, Raybourne RB, Babu US, Lillehoj HS, Heckert RA (2003) CpG-induced immunomodulation and intracellular bacterial killing in a chicken macrophage cell line. Dev Comp Immunol 27:823–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Yilmaz
    • 1
  • Shixue Shen
    • 1
  • David L. Adelson
    • 2
  • Suresh Xavier
    • 2
  • James J. Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Poultry ScienceTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Animal ScienceTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations