Advertisement

European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 249–260 | Cite as

A study of Love wave acoustic biosensors monitoring the adhesion process of tendon stem cells (TSCs)

  • Huiyan Wu
  • Hongfei Zu
  • James H.-C. WangEmail author
  • Qing-Ming WangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The Love wave biosensor is considered to be one of the most promising probing methods in biomedical research and diagnosis, and has been applied to detect the mechano–biological behaviour of cells attached to the surface of the device. More efforts should be devoted to basic theoretical research and relevant device performance analysis that may contribute to the further developments of Love wave sensors. In this study, a 36º YX-LiTaO3-based Love wave sensor with a parylene-C wave guiding layer was adopted as a cell-based biosensor to monitor the adhesion process of tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSCs), a newly discovered cell type in tendons. A theoretical model is proposed to describe the Love wave propagation, in which the adherent cells are considered as a uniform viscoelastic layer. The effects of viscoelastic cell layer and wave guiding layer on the propagation velocity υ and propagation loss (PL) are investigated. The numerical results indicate that adherent cell layers of different storage or loss shear modulus in certain ranges can induce pronounced and characteristic variations in υ and PL, revealing the potential of Love wave sensors to provide useful quantitative measures on cellular mechanical properties. The sensor response to the adhesion of TSCs exhibits high consistency with experimental observations, which demonstrates the Love wave biosensor as a very promising sensor platform for investigating cellular activities under multiple physiological conditions.

Keywords

Love wave acoustic sensor Biosensor Parylene-C Cell adhesion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Huiyan Wu thanks Dr. J. Zhang, Dr. T. Yuan, Dr. Y. Zhou, and Dr. G. Zhao for their help during the course of this study. This work is supported in part by the NIH Grant AR060920 and AR061395 (JHW).

References

  1. Auld BA (1973) Acoustic fields and waves in solids. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballantine DS et al (1997) Acoustic wave sensor: theory, design, and physico-chemical applications. In: Stern R, Levy M (eds) Applications of modern acoustics. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender F, Cernosek RW, Josse F (2000) Love-wave biosensors using cross-linked polymer waveguides on LiTaO3. Electron Lett 36(19):1672–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branch DW, Brozik SM (2004) Low-level detection of a Bacillus anthracis simulant using love-wave biosensors on 36°YX LiTaO3. Biosens Bioelectron 19(8):849–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang TY et al (2007) Cell and protein compatibility of parylene-C. Langmuir 23:11718–11725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du J et al (1996) A study of love-wave acoustic sensors. Sens Actuators A 56:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fabry B et al (2001) Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 87(14):148102-1–148102-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaso MIR et al (2013) Love wave biosensors: a review. In: Rinken T (ed) State of the art in biosensors-general aspects. InTech, London, p 360Google Scholar
  9. Giaever I, Keese CR (1993) A morphological biosensor for mammalian cells. Nature 366:591–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginsberg MH, Du X, Plow EF (1992) Inside-out integrin signalling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 4:766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gizeli E (1997) Design considerations for the acoustic waveguide biosensor. Smart Mater Struct 6:700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gizeli E et al (2003) Sensitivity of the acoustic waveguide biosensor to protein binding as a function of the waveguide properties. Biosens Bioelectron 18:1399–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardin J, Bertoni G, Kleinsmith LJ (2012) Becker’s world of the cell. Pearson Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrmann F et al (2001) Microacoustic sensors for liquid monitoring. Sens Update 9(1):105–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jakoby B, Vellekoop MJ (1997) Properties of love waves-applications in sensors. Smart Mater Struct 6:668–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalantar-Zadeh K et al (2003) Novel love mode surface acoustic wave based immunosensors. Sens Actuators B 91:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lange K, Grimm S, Rapp M (2007) Chemical modification of parylene C coatings for SAW biosensors. Sens Actuators B 125:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li J et al (2005) Monitoring of integrin-mediated adhesion of human ovarian cancer cells to model protein surfaces by quartz crystal resonators-evaluation in the impedance analysis mode. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1333–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li F, Wang JH-C, Wang Q-M (2007) Monitoring cell adhesion by using thickness shear mode acoustic wave sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 23:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu J, He S (2010) Theoretical analysis on love waves in a layered structure with a piezoelectric substate and multiple elastic layers. J Appl Phys 107:073511-1–073511-8Google Scholar
  21. Liu J et al (2013) Properties of Love Waves in a Piezoelectric Layered Structure with a Viscoelastic Guiding Layer. Smart Mater Struct 22:125034-1–125034-8Google Scholar
  22. Marx KA et al (2005) Quartz crystal microbalance biosensor study of endothelial cells and their extracellular matrix following cell removal-evidence for transient cellular stress and viscoelastic changes during detachment and the elastic behavior of the pure matrix. Anal Biochem 343:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matatagui D et al (2011) Array of love-wave sensors based on quartz/novolac to detect CWA simulants. Talanta 85:1442–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McHale G, Newton MI, Martin F (2002) Theoretical mass sensitivity of love wave and layer guided acoustic plate mode sensors. J Appl Phys 91(12):9701–9710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McHale G, Newton ML, Martin F (2003) Theoretical mass, liquid, and polymer sensitivity of acoustic wave sensors with viscoelastic guiding layers. J Appl Phys 93(1):675–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saitakis M, Tsortos A, Gizeli E (2010) Probing the interaction of a membrane receptor with a surface-attached ligand using whole cells on acoustic biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 25:1688–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith RT, Welsh FS (1971) Temperature dependence of the elastic, piezoelectric, and dielectric constants of lithium tantalate and lithium niobate. J Appl Phys 42:2219–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith BA et al (2005) Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: stiffening induced by contractile agonist. Biophys J 88(4):2994–3007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tan L et al (2009) Dynamic measurement of the surface stress induced by the attachment and growth of cells on au electrode with a quartz crystal microbalance. Biosens Bioelectron 24:1603–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang P, Liu Q (2010) Cell-based biosensors: principles and applications. Artech House, Norwoord, p 271Google Scholar
  31. Wang Z, Cheeke JDN, Jen CK (1994) Sensitivity analysis for love mode acoustic gravimetric sensors. Appl Phys Lett 64:2940–2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. White RM (1970) Surface elastic waves. Proc IEEE 58(8):1238–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu H et al (2015) Monitoring the adhesion process of tendon stem cells using shear-horizontal surface acoustic wave sensors. In: 2015 Joint conference of ieee international frequency control & european frequency and time forum, 2015, Denver, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu H et al (2015) Aging-related viscoelasticity variation of tendon stem cells (TSC) characterized by quartz thickness shear mode (TSM) resonators. Sens Actuators B 210:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu H et al (2017) Theoretical analysis of love wave biosensors in liquid with a viscoelastic wave guiding layer. J Appl Phys 121:054501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang X et al (2016) A novel sensitive cell-based love wave biosensor for marine toxin detection. Biosens Bioelectron 77:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of EngineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations