Advertisement

European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 161–171 | Cite as

Magnetic material diversity in Brazilian ants: displacement behaviour and environmental adaptability

  • Darci M. S. Esquivel
  • Eliane WajnbergEmail author
  • Leonel Cardozo de Menezes e Souza
  • Daniel Acosta-Avalos
  • Márcia Barbosa Pinho
  • Ana Yoshi Harada
Original Article
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

How geomagnetic field information is collected and processed by insects for orientation and navigation remains elusive. In social insects, magnetic particles are well accepted as magnetic sensors. Ants have the ability to home and hunt, and some migratory and nomadic species can migrate or move over long distances for which magnetoreception is an important mechanism. It was shown previously that ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectral parameters of one migratory and one nomadic ant could be distinguished from Brazilian Solenopsis ant species and that these parameters correlate to the local geomagnetic field. The present work focuses on genera engaged in long-distance group raids and emigration collected mainly in the Amazon rainforest. A diversity of specimens of the genus was individually measured by FMR. Cluster analysis of the occurrence of the FMR Low Field component, associated with large or aggregated nanoparticles, and their spectral angular dependence resulted in a phylogenetic dendrogram of the genera of ants, principally from the North Brazilian region. The magnetic material characteristics of ants of the Invertebrate Collection from the Museum Paraense Emilio Goeldi were tested looking for their relation to ant genera and the local geomagnetic field. The observed spectral differences of the magnetic particles suggest that they are related to their capacity for adaptation to their environment and/or to displacement behaviour.

Keywords

Magnetic material Ferromagnetic resonance Phylogenetic analysis Raiding Ant adaptability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Observatório Nacional for supporting its operation and the Tatuoca campus for geomagnetic data not available electronically. The authors gratefully thank the use of IGRF model that is a product of NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration at http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/igrf.html. We thank Dr. William Overal for collecting environments information, Marcia Barbosa for FMR measurements and LCM Souza thanks the CNPq for the fellowship.

References

  1. Acosta-Avalos D, Esquivel DMS, Wajnberg E, Lins de Barros HGP, Oliveira PS, Leal I (2001) Seasonal patterns in the orientation system of the migratory ant Pachycondyla marginata. Naturwissenschaften 88:343–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Billen J (1992) Origin of the trail pheromone in Ecitoninae: a behavioural and morphological examination. In: Billen J (ed) Biology and evoution of social insects. Leaven University Press, Leaven, pp 203–209Google Scholar
  3. Charilaou M (2017) Ferromagnetic resonance of biogenic nanoparticle-chains. J Appl Phys 122:063903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choudhuri S (2014) Bioinformatics for beginners. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Dejean A, Corbara B, Roux O, Orivel J (2014) The antipredatory behaviours of Neotropical ants towards army ant raids (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 19:17–24Google Scholar
  6. El-Jaick LJ, Acosta-Avalos D, Esquivel DMS, Wajnberg E, Linhares MP (2001) EPR study of Honeybees Apis mellifera abdomens. Eur Biophys J 29:579–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandes IO, Oliveira ML, Delabie JHC (2014) Description of two new species in Neotropical Pachycondyla foetida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:Ponerinae) and taxonomic notes on the genus. Myrmecol News 19:233–264Google Scholar
  8. Franks NR, Fletcher CR (1983) Spatial patterns in army ant foraging and migration: Eciton burchelli on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hölldobler B, Janssen E, Bestmann HJ, Leal IR, Oliveira PS, Kern F, König WA (1996) Comunication in the migratory termite-hunting ant Pachycondyla (= Termitopone) marginata (Formicidae, Ponerinae). J Comp Physiol A 178:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanan M (2014) Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 20:53–70PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lohman KJ (2010) Magnetic-field perception. Nature 464:1140–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mill AE (1982) Emigration of a colony of the giant termite hunter, Pachycondyla commutata (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Fomicidae). Entomol Mon Mag 118:243–245Google Scholar
  14. Mill A E (1984) Predation by the ponerine ant Pachycondyla commutata on termites of the genus Syntermes in Amazonian rain forest. J Nat Hist 18:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Donnell SO, Kaspari M, Kumar A, Lattke J, Powell S (2011) Elevational and geographic variation in army ant swarm raid rates. Insect Soc D 58:293–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0129-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oliveira JF, Wajnberg E, Esquivel DMS, Weinkauf S, Winklhofer M, Hanzlik M (2010) J R Soc Interface 7:143–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Powell S, Baker B (2008) Os grandes predadores dos neotrópicos: comportamento, dieta e impacto das formigas de correição (ecitoninae). In: Ferreira Vilela E, dos Santos IA, Serrão JE, Schoereder JH, Lino-Neto J, de Campos OLA (eds) Insetos sociais da biologia à aplicação. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, pp 18–37Google Scholar
  18. Rettenmeyer CW, Rettenmeyer ME, Joseph J, Berghoff SM (2011) The largest animal association centered on one species: the army ant Eciton burchellii and its more than 300 associates. Insect Soc 58:281–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0128-82011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Riveros AJ, Esquivel DMS, Wajnberg E, Srygley RB (2014) Do leaf-cutter ants Atta colombica obtain their magnetic sensors from soil? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1621-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt C (2013) Molecular phylogenetics of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Zootaxa 3647:201–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt CA, Shattuck SO (2014) The higher classification of the ant subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of Ponerine ecology and behavior. Zootaxa 3817(1):001–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schroeder TBH, Houghtaling J, Wilts BD, Mayer M (2018) It’s not a bug, it’s a feature: functional materials in insects. Adv Mater 30:1705322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaw J, Boyd A, House M, Woodward R, Mathes F, Cowin G, Saunders M, Baer B (2015) Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception. J R Soc Interface 12:20150499.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0499 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Teles da Silva M (1982) Behaviour of army ants Eciton burchelli and E. hamatum (hymenoptera, formicidae) in the Belem region III: raid activity. Insectes Soc Paris 29:243–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wajnberg E, Acosta-Avalos D, El-Jaick LJ, Abraçado L, Coelho JLAA, Bakuzis F, Morais PC, Esquivel DMS (2000) Electron paramagnetic resonance study of the migratory ant Pachycondyla marginata abdomens. Biophys J 78:1018–1023CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wajnberg E, Alves OC, Harada AY, Esquivel DMS (2005) Brazilian ants diversity and the local geomagnetic field: a ferromagnetic resonance study. Biometals 18:595–602.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-005-2995-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wajnberg E, Acosta-Avalos D, Alves OC, Oliveira JF, Srygley RB, Esquivel DMS (2010) Magnetoreception in eusocial insects: an update. J R Soc Interface 7:S207–S225.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0526.focus CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wajnberg E, Rossi AL, Esquivel DMS (2017) Titanium and iron titanium oxide nanoparticles in antennae of the migratory ant Pachycondyla marginata: an alternative magnetic sensor for magnetoreception? Biometals 30:541–548.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-017-0024-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiss BP, Kimc SS, Kirschvink JL, Kopp RE, Sankarand M, Kobayashie A, Komeilia A (2004) Ferromagnetic resonance and low-temperature magnetic tests for biogenic magnetite. Earth Plan Sci Lett 224:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wetterer JK, Snelling GC (2015) Geographic distribution of Labidus coecus(Latr.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) a subterranean army ant. J Hymenopt Res 44:31–38.  https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.44.4672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wild AL (2002) The genus Pachycondyla (Hymenoptera: formicidae) in Paraguay. Bol Mus Nac Hist Nat Parag 14:1–18Google Scholar
  32. Willson SK, Sharp R, Ramler IR, Sen A (2011) A spatial movement optimization in Amazonian Eciton burchellii army ants. Insect Soc 58:325–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0171-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson EO (1971) The insectes societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, p 548Google Scholar
  34. Wilstchko W, Wilstchko R (1995) Magnetic orientation in animals. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Winklhofer M, Kirschvink JL (2010) A quantitative assessment of torque-transducer models for magnetoreception. J R Soc Interface 7:S273–S289.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0435.focus PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas FísicasRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Museu Paraense Emílio GoeldiBelémBrazil

Personalised recommendations