Advertisement

European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 47, Issue 7, pp 693–696 | Cite as

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC): a seminal tool offering multiple solutions

  • Olwyn Byron
  • Ivo Nischang
  • Trushar R. Patel
Editorial

Abstract

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) remains a highly versatile and widely applicable tool for the analysis of macromolecules and their interactions. The current state-of-the-art was demonstrated at a recent international meeting held in Glasgow, Scotland, in July 2017, the 23rd International Analytical Ultracentrifugation Workshop and Symposium. This special issue showcases the reports made at the meeting, which concerned the application of AUC to a wide range of topics in biochemical and polymer science including antibody and membrane protein characterisation, and protein–carbohydrate interactions. Presentations on development and testing of new instrumentation and methods of analysis were a particular feature of the meeting, including the optimisation of experimental protocols, and the latest optimised computational approaches to experimental simulation and the modelling of macromolecular structures.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the sponsors without whom AUC 2017 would not have been possible. We are thankful to our major sponsor, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, and to Anton Paar and MEP Instruments (now, Metrohm) for their financial support. EBSA (European Biophysical Societies’ Association), COST (European Cooperation in Science & Technology), and ARBRE-MOBIEU generously contributed travel bursaries to enable participation in the meeting, while the British Biophysical Society and Macromolecular Journals donated the well-deserved poster prizes. The community looks forward to its next meeting at University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand in 2019.

References

  1. Azam AA et al (2018) Production of membrane proteins for characterisation of their pheromone-sensing and antimicrobial resistance functions. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1325-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharyya SK, Maciejewska P, Börger L, Stadler M, Gülsün AM, Cicek HB, Cölfen H (2006) Development of a fast fiber based UV-Vis multiwavelength detector for an ultracentrifuge. In: W C, Cölfen H (eds) Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Brookes E, Rocco M (2018) Recent advances in the UltraScan SOlution MOdeller (US-SOMO) hydrodynamic and small-angle scattering data analysis and simulation suite. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1296-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Channell G, Dinu V, Adams GG, Harding SE (2018) A simple cell-alignment protocol for sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation to complement mechanical and optical alignment procedures. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1328-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cölfen H et al (2010) The open AUC project. Eur Biophys J 39:347–359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-009-0438-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowther JM, Allison JR, Smolenski GA, Hodgkinson AJ, Jameson GB, Dobson RCJ (2018) The self-association and thermal denaturation of caprine and bovine beta-lactoglobulin. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1300-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. García de la Torre JG, Cifre JGH, Pena AID (2018) Prediction and analysis of analytical ultracentrifugation experiments for heterogeneous macromolecules and nanoparticles based on Brownian dynamics simulation. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1322-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gorbet GE, Mohapatra S, Demeler B (2018) Multi-speed sedimentation velocity implementation in UltraScan-III. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1297-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harding SE (2018) The Svedberg Lecture 2017. From nano to micro: the huge dynamic range of the analytical ultracentrifuge for characterising the sizes, shapes and interactions of molecules and assemblies in Biochemistry and Polymer Science. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1321-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmann A, Grassl K, Gommert J, Schlesak C, Bepperling A (2018) Precise determination of protein extinction coefficients under native and denaturing conditions using SV-AUC. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1299-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson CN, Gorbet GE, Ramsower H, Urquidi J, Brancaleon L, Demeler B (2018) Multi-wavelength analytical ultracentrifugation of human serum albumin complexed with porphyrin. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1301-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim H, Brookes E, Cao W, Demeler B (2018) Two-dimensional grid optimization for sedimentation velocity analysis in the analytical ultracentrifuge. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1309-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Patel TR, Besong TMD, Meier M, McEleney K, Harding SE, Winzor DJ, Stetefeld J (2018) Interaction studies of a protein and carbohydrate system using an integrated approach: a case study of the miniagrin-heparin system. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1291-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rocco M, Byron O (2015) Computing translational diffusion and sedimentation coefficients: an evaluation of experimental data and programs. Eur Biophys J 44:417–431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-015-1042-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schneider CM, Cölfen H (2018) Analytical band centrifugation revisited Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1315-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Stafford WF, Sherwood PJ (2004) Analysis of heterologous interacting systems by sedimentation velocity: curve fitting algorithms for estimation of sedimentation coefficients, equilibrium and kinetic constants. Biophys Chem 108:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2003.10.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wakefield JMK, Gillis RB, Adams GG, McQueen CMA, Harding SE (2018) Controlled depolymerisation assessed by analytical ultracentrifugation of low molecular weight chitosan for use in archaeological conservation. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1290-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wawra SE, Thoma M, Walter J, Lubbert C, Thajudeen T, Damm C, Peukert W (2018) Ionomer and protein size analysis by analytical ultracentrifugation and electrospray scanning mobility particle sizer. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1314-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Whalen DM, Malinauskas T, Gilbert RJ, Siebold C (2013) Structural insights into proteoglycan-shaped Hedgehog signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:16420–16425.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310097110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams TL, Gorbet GE, Demeler B (2018) Multi-speed sedimentation velocity simulations with UltraScan-III. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1308-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wright RT, Hayes D, Sherwood PJ, Stafford WF, Correia JJ (2018) AUC measurements of diffusion coefficients of monoclonal antibodies in the presence of human serum proteins. Eur Biophys J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-018-1319-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry (IOMC)Friedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  3. 3.Jena Center for Soft Matter (JCSM)Friedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Alberta RNA Research and Training InstituteUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations