European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 647–654 | Cite as

A new way of tracking motion, shape, and divisions

Original Paper


The process of detecting and tracking biological features such as bacteria and nuclei is complicated by the fact that they constantly change their shape. Shape changes happen both continuously as the biological features grow and discontinuously as they divide or die. In this paper I present a new method of tracking such features for the case that they can be reasonably approximated by a relatively simple mathematical shape such as a cylinder or an ellipse. Using contour plots with multiple levels to detect the features and their shapes, rather than the commonly used single contour detection technique, this method can efficiently detect multiple features even if they have large differences in brightness, as well as reliably track divisions when both brightness and size drop dramatically.


Image analysis Feature detection Tracking Cell lineage reconstruction 

Supplementary material

249_2013_912_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
PDF (1146 KB)


  1. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2):266–277 doi:10.1109/83.902291 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crocker JC, Grier DG (1996) Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 179(1):298–310 doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Driever W, Nüsselein-Volhard C (1988) A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 54(1):83–93 doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90182-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dufour A, Shinin V, Tajbakhsh S, Guillén-Aghion N, Olivo-Marin JC, Zimmer C (2005) Segmenting and tracking fluorescent cells in dynamic 3-d microscopy with coupled active surfaces. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(9):1396–1410 doi:10.1109/TIP.2005.852790 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dzyubachyk O, van Cappellen WA, Essers J, Niessen WJ, Meijering E (2010) Advanced level-set-based cell tracking in time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(3):852–867 doi:10.1109/TMI.2009.2038693 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitzgibbon A., Pilu M., Fisher R.B. (1999) Direct least square fitting of ellipses. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 21(5):476–480 doi:10.1109/34.765658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foe VE, Alberts BM (1983) Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Cell Sci 61(1):31–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregor T, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, Tank DW, Wieschaus EF (2005) Diffusion and scaling during early embryonic pattern formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(51):18403–18407 doi:10.1073/pnas.0509483102 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregor T, Wieschaus EF, McGregor AP, Bialek W, Tank DW (2007) Stability and nuclear dynamics of the bicoid morphogen gradient. Cell 130(1):141–152 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.026 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Idema T, Dubuis JO, Manning ML, Nelson PC, Liu AJ (2013) The syncytial Drosophila embryo as a mechanically excitable medium. arXiv:1304.4025Google Scholar
  11. Zimmer C, Zhang B, Dufour A, Thébaud A, Berlemont S, Meas-Yedid V, Marin JCO (2006) On the digital trail of mobile cells. IEEE Signal Process Mag 23(3):54–62 doi:10.1109/MSP.2006.1628878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations