European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 235–246 | Cite as

Ion fluxes, transmembrane potential, and osmotic stabilization: a new dynamic electrophysiological model for eukaryotic cells

  • Clair Poignard
  • Aude Silve
  • Frederic Campion
  • Lluis M. Mir
  • Olivier Saut
  • Laurent Schwartz
Original Paper


Survival of mammalian cells is achieved by tight control of cell volume, while transmembrane potential has been known to control many cellular functions since the seminal work of Hodgkin and Huxley. Regulation of cell volume and transmembrane potential have a wide range of implications in physiology, from neurological and cardiac disorders to cancer and muscle fatigue. Therefore, understanding the relationship between transmembrane potential, ion fluxes, and cell volume regulation has become of great interest. In this paper we derive a system of differential equations that links transmembrane potential, ionic concentrations, and cell volume. In particular, we describe the dynamics of the cell within a few seconds after an osmotic stress, which cannot be done by the previous models in which either cell volume was constant or osmotic regulation instantaneous. This new model demonstrates that both membrane potential and cell volume stabilization occur within tens of seconds of changes in extracellular osmotic pressure. When the extracellular osmotic pressure is constant, the cell volume varies as a function of transmembrane potential and ion fluxes, thus providing an implicit link between transmembrane potential and cell volume. Experimental data provide results that corroborate the numerical simulations of the model in terms of time-related changes in cell volume and dynamics of the phenomena. This paper can be seen as a generalization of previous electrophysiological results, since under restrictive conditions they can be derived from our model.


Electric potential Cell volume regulation Ion concentration Membrane permeability Osmotic equilibrium 


  1. Armstrong CM (2003) The Na/K pump, Cl ion, and osmotic stabilization of cells. PNAS 100:6257–6262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clausen T, Nielsen O (2007) Potassium, Na+,K+-pumps and fatigue in rat muscle. J Physiol 584:295–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeBruin K, Krassowska W (1999) Modelling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects of field strength and rest potential. Biophys J 77:1213–1224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubois JM, Rouzaire-Dubois B (2004) The influence of cell volume changes on tumour cell proliferation. Eur J Physiol 33:227–232Google Scholar
  5. Endresen L, Hall K, Høye JSH, Myrheim J (2000) A theory of the membrane potential of living cells. Eur Biophys J 29:90–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fraser JA, Huang C (2004) A quantitative analysis of cell volume and resting potential determination and regulation in excitable cells. J Physiol 559(2):459–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser JA, Huang C (2007) Quantitative techniques for steady-state calculation and dynamic integrated modelling of membrane potential and intracellular ion concentrations. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 94:336–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraser JA, Rang CE, Usher-Smith JA, Huang C (2005) Slow volume transients in amphibian skeletal muscle fibres studied in hypotonic solutions. J Physiol 564:51–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldman D (1943) Potential, impedance and rectification in membranes. J Gen Physiol 27:37–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hernández J, Cristina E (1998) Modeling cell volume regulation in nonexcitable cells: the roles of the Na+ pump and of cotransport systems. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 275:1067–1080Google Scholar
  11. Hodgkin A, Katz B (1949) The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of the giant squid axon. J Physiol 108:37–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodgkin L, Horowicz P (1959) The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol 148:127–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodgkin L, Huxley A (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jakobsson E (1980) Interactions of cell volume, membrane potential and membrane transport parameters. Am J Physiol 238:C196–C206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Juel C (1986) Potassium and sodium shifts during in vitro isometric muscle contraction, and the time course of the ion-gradient recovery. Pflugers Arch 406:458–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landahl H (1948) A note on the units of membrane permeability to water. Bull Math Biophys 10:187–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lang F, Busch G, Ritter M, Völkl H, Waldegger S, Gulbins E, Häussinger D (1998) Functional significance of cell volume regulatory mechanisms. Physiol Rev 78:247–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky L, Matsudaira P, Baltimore DJD (1986) Molecular cell biology, 4th edn. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Malmivuo J, Plonsey R (1995) Bioelectromagnetism- principles and applications of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathai J, Tristram-Nagle S, Nagle J, Zeidel M (2007) Structural determinants of water permeability through the lipid membrane. J Gen Physiol 131(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rouzaire-Dubois B, Dubois JM (2004) K+ channel block-induced mammalianthe influence of cell volume changes on tumour cell proliferation. Eur J Physiol 33:227–232Google Scholar
  22. Rouzaire-Dubois B, Ouanounou G, O’Reagan S, Dubois JM (2009) Sodium-dependent activity of aquaporin-1 in rat glioma cells: a new mechanism of cell volume regulation. Eur J Physiol 457:1187–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sjøgaard G, Adams R, Saltin B (1985) Water and ion shifts in skeletal muscle of humans with intense dynamic knee extension. Am J Physiol 248:190–196Google Scholar
  24. Usher-Smith JA, Skepper JN, Fraser JA, Huang C (2006) Effect of repetitive stimulation on cell volume and its relationship to membrane potential in amphibian skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch 452:231–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clair Poignard
    • 1
  • Aude Silve
    • 2
  • Frederic Campion
    • 3
  • Lluis M. Mir
    • 2
  • Olivier Saut
    • 1
  • Laurent Schwartz
    • 4
  1. 1.INRIA Bordeaux-Sud Ouest Team research MC2Institut Mathématiques de Bordeaux, UMR CNRS 5251 (Applied Mathematics)Talence CedexFrance
  2. 2.Laboratory of Vectorology and Anticancer Therapies, Institut Gustave RoussyUniversité Paris-Sud, CNRS, UMR 8203VillejuifFrance
  3. 3.The Copenhagen Muscle Research CentreCopenhagen NDenmark
  4. 4.Service de RadiothérapieHôpital Universitaire Pitié-SalpétrièreParisFrance

Personalised recommendations