Membrane protein dynamics in different environments: simulation study of the outer membrane protein X in a lipid bilayer and in a micelle
- 355 Downloads
The bacterial outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli has been investigated by molecular dynamics simulations when embedded in a phospholipid bilayer and as a protein-micelle aggregate. The resulting simulation trajectories were analysed in terms of structural and dynamic properties of the membrane protein. In agreement with experimental observations, highest relative stability was found for the β-barrel region that is embedded in the lipophilic phase, whereas an extracellular protruding β-sheet, which is a unique structural feature of OmpX that supposedly plays an important role in cell adhesion and invasion, shows larger structure fluctuations. Additionally, we investigated water permeation into the core of the β-barrel protein, which contains a tight salt-bridge and hydrogen-bond network, so that extensive water flux is unlikely. Differences between the bilayer and the micellar system were observed in the length of the barrel and its position inside the lipid environment, and in the protein interactions with the hydrophilic part of the lipids near the lipid/water interface. Those variations suggest that micelles and other detergent environments might not offer a wholly membrane-like milieu to promote adoption of the physiological conformational state by OmpX.
KeywordsMolecular dynamics Membrane protein Protein-water interactions Protein-lipid interactions Micelle bilayer comparison
Financial support was obtained from the ETH Zürich and the Swiss National Science Foundation through the National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Structural Biology (K.W., W.F.G.) and grant no. 200020-121913 (W.F.G.), which is gratefully acknowledged.
- Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J (1981) Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In: Pullman B (ed) Intermolecular forces. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 331–342Google Scholar
- Bond PJ, Sansom MSP (2003) Membrane protein dynamics versus environment: simulations of OmpA in a micelle and in a bilayer. J Mol Biol 329(5):1035–1053. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(0310.1016/S0022-2836(03)00408-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chandrasekhar I, Kastenholz M, Lins RD, Oostenbrink C, Schuler LD, Tieleman DP, van Gunsteren WF (2003) A consistent potential energy parameter set for lipids: dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine as a benchmark of the GROMOS96 45A3 force field. Eur Biophys J 32(1):67–77. doi: 10.1007/s00249-002-0269-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherezov V, Rosenbaum DM, Hanson MA, Rasmussen SGF, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, Choi HJ, Kuhn P, Weis WI, Kobilka BK, Stevens RC (2007) High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human 2-adrenergic G protein coupled receptor. Science 318(5854):1258–1265. doi: 10.1126/science.1150577 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Planque MRR, Bonev BB, Demmers JA, Greathouse DV, Koeppe RE, Separovic F, Watts A, Killian AJ (2003) Interfacial anchor properties of tryptophan residues in transmembrane peptides can dominate over hydrophobic matching effects in peptide-lipid interactions. Biochemistry 42(18):5341–5348. doi: 10.1021/bi027000r PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hanson MA, Cherezov V, Griffith MT, Roth CB, Jaakola VP, Chien EYT, Velasquez J, Kuhn P, Stevens RC (2008) A specific cholesterol binding site is established by the 2.8 Å structure of the human β2-adrenergic receptor. Structure 16(6):897–905. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wüthrich K (1997) Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(23):12366–12371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12366 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising A, Hünenberger PH, Krüger P, Mark A, Scott WRP, Tironi IG (1996) Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual und user guide. Hochschulverlag an der ETH Zürich, ZürichGoogle Scholar
- van Gunsteren WF, Bakowies D, Baron R, Chandrasekhar I, Christen M, Daura X, Gee P, Geerke DP, Glättli A, Hünenberger PH, Kastenholz MA, Oostenbrink C, Schenk M, Trzesniak D, van der Vegt NFA, Yu HB (2006) Biomolecular modeling: goals, problems, perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed 45(25):4064–4092. doi: 10.1002/anie.200502655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wüthrich K, Braun W, Billeter M (1983) Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance. J Mol Biol 169(4):9490-961. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80144-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar