European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 39, Issue 10, pp 1465–1470

Technical aspects of measurement of cellular electromagnetic activity

Biophysics Letter

Abstract

Electromagnetic fields generated by living cells have been experimentally investigated in the past 3 decades; however, the results are often inconsistent. In this paper we discuss some technical aspects of such challenging experiments, a brief review of which is also included. Special attention is paid to the sensor with respect to the power available from a cell and the power needed to excite the macroscopic measurement devices. We drew the conclusion that the nanoelectronic approach should be used.

Keywords

Cellular biophysics Electromagnetic activity of cell Nanoelectronics Weak power measurements 

References

  1. Belyaev I (2005) Nonthermal biological effects of microwaves: current knowledge, further perspective, and urgent needs. Electromagn Biol Med 24:375–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cifra M (2009) Study of electromagnetic oscillations of yeast cells in kHz and GHz region. Dissertation, Czech Technical University in PragueGoogle Scholar
  3. Grundler W, Keilmann F (1983) Sharp resonances in yeast growth prove nonthermal sensitivity to microwaves. Phys Rev Lett 51:1214–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hölzel R (1990) Elektromagnetische Felder in der Umgebung lebender Zellen. Dissertation, Frei Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Hölzel R (1997) Electrorotation of single yeast cells at frequencies between 100 Hz and 1.6 GHz. Biophys J 73:1103–1109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hölzel R, Lamprecht I (1995) Optimizing an electronic detection system for radiofrequency oscillations in biological cells. Neural Netw World 5:763–774Google Scholar
  7. Hölzel R (2001) Electric activity of non-excitable biological cells at radiofrequencies. Electro Magnetobiol 20:1–13Google Scholar
  8. Hölzel R, Lamprecht I (1994) Electromagnetic fields around biological cells. Neural Netw World 3:327–337Google Scholar
  9. Jafary-Asl AH, Smith CW (1983) Biological dielectrics in electric and magnetic fields. In: Annual report conference of electrical insulation and dielectric phenomena, IEEE Publications, vol 83, pp 350–355Google Scholar
  10. Jelínek F et al (1996) Measurement system for experimental verification of Fröhlich electromagnetic field. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 41:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jelínek F et al (1999) Microelectronic sensors for measurement of electromagnetic fields of living cells and experimental results. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 48:261–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jelínek F et al (2002) Experimental investigation of electromagnetic activity of living cells at millimeter waves. In: Abstract book of international symposium of endogenous physical fields in biology, pp 57–58Google Scholar
  13. Jelínek F et al (2005) Experimental investigation of electromagnetic activity of yeast cells at millimeter waves. Electromagn Biol Med 24:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jelínek F et al (2007) Measurement of electromagnetic activity of yeast cells at 42 GHz. Radioengineering 16:36–39Google Scholar
  15. Jelínek F et al (2009) Measurement of electrical oscillations and mechanical vibrations of yeast cells membrane around 1 kHz. Electromagn Biol Med 28:223–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamprecht I (1980) Growth and metabolism in yeasts. In: Beezer AE (ed) Biological microcalorimetry. Academic Press, London, pp 43–112Google Scholar
  17. Nakamura H, Wada A (1985) Nature of the charge distribution in proteins III electric multipole structures. J Phys Soc Jpn 54:4047–4052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pohl HA (1985) AC field effects of and by living cells. In: Chiabrera A, Nicolini C, Schwan HP (eds) Interactions between electromagnetic fields and cells. Plenum press, New York, pp 437–458Google Scholar
  19. Pohl HA et al (1981) Life cycle alterations of the micro-dielectrophoretic effects of cells. J Biol Phys 9:133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pokorný J (2009) Biophysical cancer transformation pathway. Electromagn Biol Med 28:105–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pokorný J, Wu TM (1998) Biophysical aspects of coherence and biological order. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Pokorný J et al (1991) Fröhlich coherent vibrations and Raman scattering. Czech J Phys 41:484–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pokorný J et al (2001) Electromagnetic activity of yeast cells in the M phase. Electro Magnetobiol 20:371–396Google Scholar
  24. Tsong YT et al (1989) Resonance electroconformational coupling: a proposed mechanism for energy and signal transductions by membrane proteins. Biosci Rep 9:13–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ondřej Kučera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michal Cifra
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jiří Pokorný
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Photonics and Electronics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 8Czech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Circuit Theory, FEECzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Electromagnetic Field, FEECzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations