European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 144–154 | Cite as

Neuron–transistor coupling: interpretation of individual extracellular recorded signals

  • Sven Ingebrandt
  • Chi-Kong Yeung
  • Michael Krause
  • Andreas Offenhäusser
Article

Abstract

The electrical coupling of randomly migrating neurons from rat explant brain-stem slice cultures to the gates of non-metallized field-effect transistors (FETs) has been investigated. The objective of our work is the precise interpretation of extracellular recorded signal shapes in comparison to the usual patch-clamp protocols to evaluate the possible use of the extracellular recording technique in electrophysiology. The neurons from our explant cultures exhibited strong voltage-gated potassium currents through the plasma membrane. With an improved noise level of the FET set-up, it was possible to record individual extracellular responses without any signal averaging. Cells were attached by patch-clamp pipettes in voltage-clamp mode and stimulated by voltage step pulses. The point contact model, which is the basic model used to describe electrical contact between cell and transistor, has been implemented in the electrical simulation program PSpice. Voltage and current recordings and compensation values from the patch-clamp measurement have been used as input data for the simulation circuit. Extracellular responses were identified as composed of capacitive current and active potassium current inputs into the adhesion region between the cell and transistor gate. We evaluated the extracellular signal shapes by comparing the capacitive and the slower potassium signal amplitudes. Differences in amplitudes were found, which were interpreted in previous work as enhanced conductance of the attached membrane compared to the average value of the cellular membrane. Our results suggest rather that additional effects like electrodiffusion, ion sensitivity of the sensors or more detailed electronic models for the small cleft between the cell and transistor should be included in the coupling model.

Keywords

Electrophysiology Extracellular recording Neurons Patch clamp Voltage clamp 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Prof Dr W. Knoll (Max-Planck-Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz), in whose group this project was initiated. We thank Prof Dr A. Maelicke (Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany) and his group for the use of their animal facility, and Mr Lacher, Drs T. Zetterer and W. Staab from the Institute for Microtechnique, Mainz, for the support during fabrication of the FET sensors. We acknowledge the excellent technical support of Mr Müller and Mr Richter and the other members of the electronic laboratory, and Mr Gerstenberg and Mr Christ from the mechanical workshop of the MPI for Polymer Research. This work was funded by the Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF), German Ministry of Science and Technologie (project no. 0310895). We thank Dr C. Sprössler for his work in the field of extracellular recording using FET devices and for fruitful discussions during the project.

References

  1. Aldskogius H, Kozlova EN (1998) Central neuron-glial and glial-glial interactions following axon injury. Prog Neurobiol 55:1–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossu JL, Gähwiler BH (1996) Distinct modes of channel gating underlie inactivation of somatic K+ current in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells in vitro. J Physiol (London) 495:383–397Google Scholar
  3. DeBusschere BD, Kovacs GT (2001) A portable cell-based biosensor system using integrated CMOS cell-cartridges. Biosens Bioelectron 16:543–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eversmann B, Jenkner M, Hofmann F, Paulus C, Brederlow R, Holzapfl B, Fromherz P, Merz M, Brenner M, Schreiter M, Gabl R, Plehnert K, Steinhauser M, Eckstein G, Schmitt-Landsiedel D, Thewes R (2003) A 128×128 CMOS biosensor array for extracellular recording of neural activity. IEEE J Solid State Circuit 38:2306–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fromherz P (1999) Extracellular recording with transistors and the distribution of ionic conductances in a cell membrane. Eur Biophys J 28:254–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fromherz P, Offenhäusser A, Vetter T, Weis R (1991) A neuron-silicon junction – a retzius cell of the leech on an insulated-gate field-effect transistor. Science 252:1290–1293Google Scholar
  7. Fromherz P, Müller CO, Weis R (1993) Neuron transistor – electrical transfer-function measured by the patch-clamp technique. Phys Rev Lett 71:4079–4082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gähwiler BH (1981) Organotypic monolayer cultures of nervous tissue. J Neurosci Methods 4:329–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gähwiler BH (1984) Slice cultures of cerebellar, hippocampal and hypothalamic tissue. Experientia 40:235–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391:85–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatten ME (1999) Central nervous system neuronal migration. Annu Rev Neurosci 22: 511–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol (London) 117:500–544Google Scholar
  13. Ingebrandt S (2001) Characterisation of the cell-transistor coupling. Dissertation, University of Mainz; http://archimed.uni-mainz.deGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkner M, Fromherz P (1997) Bistability of membrane conductance in cell adhesion observed in a neuron transistor. Phys Rev Lett 79:4705–4708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause M (2000) Untersuchungen zur Zell-Transistor Kopplung mittels der Voltage-Clamp Technik. Dissertation, University of MainzGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauer L, Ingebrandt S, Scholl M, Offenhäusser A (2001) Aligned microcontact printing of biomolecules on microelectronic device surfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:838–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauer L, Vogt A, Yeung CK, Knoll W, Offenhäusser A (2002) Electrophysiological recordings of patterned rat brain stem slice neurons. Biomaterials 23:3123–3130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Offenhäusser A, Sprössler C, Matsuzawa M, Knoll W (1997) Field-effect transistor array for monitoring electrical activity from mammalian neurons in culture. Biosens Bioelectron 12:819–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pancrazio JJ, Whelan JP, Borkholder DA, Ma W, Stenger DA (1999) Development and application of cell-based biosensors. Ann Biomed Eng 27:697–711Google Scholar
  20. Pancrazio JJ, Gray SA, Shubin YS, Kulagina N, Cuttino DS, Shaffer KM, Eisemann K, Curran A, Zim B, Gross GW, O’Shaughnessy TJ (2003) A portable microelectrode array recording system incorporating cultured neuronal networks for neurotoxin detection. Biosens Bioelectron 18:1339–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Parce JW, Owicki JC, Kercso KM, Sigal GB, Wada HG, Muir VC, Bousse LJ, Ross KL, Sikic BI, McConnell HM (1989) Detection of cell-affecting agents with a silicon biosensor. Science 246:243–247Google Scholar
  22. Regehr WG, Pine J, Cohan CS, Mischke MD, Tank DW (1989) Sealing cultured invertebrate neurons to embedded dish electrodes facilitates long-term stimulation and recording. J Neurosci Methods 56:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sakmannn B, Neher E (1995) Single-channel recording, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Schätzthauer R, Fromherz P (1998) Neuron-junction with voltage-gated ionic currents. Eur J Neurosci 10:1956–1962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sigworth FJ (1995) Design of the EPC-9, a computer-controlled patch-clamp amplifier. 1. Hardware. J Neurosci Methods 56:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sigworth F J, Affolter H, Neher E (1995) Design of the EPC-9, a computer-controlled patch-clamp amplifier. 2. Software. J Neurosci Methods 56:203–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sivaramakrishnan S, Oliver DL (2001) Distinct K currents result in physiologically distinct cell types in the inferior colliculus of the rat. J Neurosci 21:2861–2877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sprössler C, Richter D, Denyer M, Offenhäusser A (1998) Long-term recording system based on field-effect transistor arrays for monitoring electrogenic cells in culture. Biosens Bioelectron 13:613–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sprössler C, Denyer M, Britland S, Knoll W, Offenhäusser A (1999) Electrical recordings from rat cardiac muscle cells using field-effect transistors. Phys Rev E 60:2171–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Storm JF (1990) Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Prog Brain Res 83:161–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Straub B, Meyer E, Fromherz P (2001) Recombinant maxi-K channels on transistor, a prototype of iono-electronic interfacing. Nat Biotechnol 19:121–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tacconi MT (1998) Neuronal death: Is there a role for astrocytes? Neurochem Res 23: 759–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Vassanelli S, Fromherz P (1999) Transistor probes local potassium conductances in the adhesion region of cultured rat hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 19:6767–6773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Weis R, Fromherz P (1997) Frequency dependent signal transfer in neuron transistors. Phys Rev E 55:877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yeung C-K, Lauer L, Offenhäusser A, Knoll W (2001) Modulation of the growth and guidance of rat brain stem neurons using patterned extracellular matrix proteins. Neurosci Lett 301:147–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeck G, Fromherz P (2001) Noninvasive neuroelectronic interfacing with synaptically connected snail neurons immobilized on a semiconductor chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10457–10462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EBSA 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Ingebrandt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chi-Kong Yeung
    • 1
    • 4
  • Michael Krause
    • 1
    • 5
  • Andreas Offenhäusser
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Polymer ResearchMainzGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Thin Films and Interfaces (ISG2)Forschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
  3. 3.Thin Films and Interfaces (ISG2)Forschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong
  5. 5.Robert Bosch GmbHStuttgart-FeuerbachGermany

Personalised recommendations