Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment

Blaž Valič; Muriel Golzio; Mojca Pavlin; Anne Schatz; Cecile Faurie; Bruno Gabriel; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols; Damijan Miklavčič

doi:10.1007/s00249-003-0296-9

European Biophysics Journal

October 2003, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 519–528 | Cite as

Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment

Authors
Authors and affiliations

Blaž Valič
Muriel Golzio
Mojca Pavlin
Anne Schatz
Cecile Faurie
Bruno Gabriel
Justin Teissié
Marie-Pierre Rols
Damijan Miklavčič

Article

First Online: 24 April 2003

Received: 10 June 2002

Revised: 20 December 2002

Accepted: 14 February 2003

1 Shares
673 Downloads
119 Citations

Abstract

The transmembrane potential on a cell exposed to an electric field is a critical parameter for successful cell permeabilization. In this study, the effect of cell shape and orientation on the induced transmembrane potential was analyzed. The transmembrane potential was calculated on prolate and oblate spheroidal cells for various orientations with respect to the electric field direction, both numerically and analytically. Changing the orientation of the cells decreases the induced transmembrane potential from its maximum value when the longest axis of the cell is parallel to the electric field, to its minimum value when the longest axis of the cell is perpendicular to the electric field. The dependency on orientation is more pronounced for elongated cells while it is negligible for spherical cells. The part of the cell membrane where a threshold transmembrane potential is exceeded represents the area of electropermeabilization, i.e. the membrane area through which the transport of molecules is established. Therefore the surface exposed to the transmembrane potential above the threshold value was calculated. The biological relevance of these theoretical results was confirmed with experimental results of the electropermeabilization of plated Chinese hamster ovary cells, which are elongated. Theoretical and experimental results show that permeabilization is not only a function of electric field intensity and cell size but also of cell shape and orientation.

Keywords

Chinese hamster ovary cells Electroporation Finite-element modelling Spheroidal cells Transmembrane potential

Abbreviations

Geometry

a: length of box side
d: membrane thickness
g_ϕϕ and g_ττ: elements of metric tensor in spheroidal coordinates
p(ϑ): arc length on an ellipse
r_i: vector of the point T(x,y,z) lying at the surface of the spheroid
R: cell radius in the case of a sphere
R₁, R₂=R₃: axes of cell in the case of a spheroid (prolate spheroid: R ₁>R ₂=R ₃; oblate spheroid R ₁<R ₂=R ₃)
S: area (surface)
T: point at the surface of the spheroid
ρ: ratio between R ₁ and R ₂
ϑ, ϕ, r: spherical coordinates
τ, ϕ, σ: spheroidal coordinates

Electric

E: applied electric field
j_n: normal component of electric current at the surface of the spheroid
L_i: depolarizing factor in the i=x, y and z directions
α: azimuth angle in the spherical coordinate system; the angle between the symmetry axis of the spheroid and the external electric field
β: polar angle in the spherical coordinate system
φ: electric potential
σ_i: conductivity of cytoplasm
σ_o: external medium conductivity
σ_m: conductivity of cell membrane
Δφ: transmembrane potential
Δφ_c: threshold or critical transmembrane potential
Δφ_i: induced transmembrane potential
Δφ_r: resting transmembrane potential

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank C. Millot for providing CHO cells. M.G. was supported by a grant from the Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM). This work was partly supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia through various grants and partly by the Cliniporator project (grant QLK3-1999-00484) under the framework of the 5th PRCD of the European Commission.

Appendix

Appendix A

In this section, the analytical solution for the induced transmembrane potential Δφ_i on a spheroidal cell is briefly discussed. Under normal physiological conditions the membrane conductance is several orders of magnitude lower than the external medium (Weaver and Chizmadzhev 1996; Kotnik et al. 1997), thus reducing the problem to solving a Laplace equation for a potential φ on a surface of a non-conductive spheroid lying in the external electrical field:

$$ \matrix{ {\Delta \phi (r,\vartheta ,\varphi ) = 0,} & {j_{\rm{n}} \mathop |\limits_S = 0} \cr } $$

(7)

where j _n is the normal component of the electric current at the surface of the spheroid, which for a non-conductive membrane is zero. This is analogous to solving a problem of the potential distribution at the surface of a dielectric spheroid (Stratton 1941). This solution can be extended to the frequency-dependent problem of a spheroid surrounded by a shell having both dielectric and conductive properties, and has been applied to cells by several authors to calculate the frequency-dependent Δφ_i (Schwartz et al. 1965; Bernhardt and Pauly 1973; Zimmermann et al. 1974; Gimsa and Wachner 2001). The solution for a DC case can be correspondingly obtained by solving the Laplace equation in the spheroidal coordinate system, which for parallel orientation has been given by Kotnik and Miklavčič (2000).

The generalized Schwan equation for an arbitrary oriented ellipsoid can be written as:

$$ \Delta \phi _{\rm{i}} = \sum\limits_{i = x,y,z} {r_i E_i } {1 \over {1 - L_i }} $$

(8)

where the r _i is the vector of the point T(x, y, z) lying at the surface of the ellipsoid and L _i are the depolarizing factors in the x, y and z directions and are dependent only on the geometrical properties of the ellipsoid. The sum of the depolarizing factors is always 1.

Analytical equations for depolarizing factors for an ellipsoid can be found in the paper by Stratton (1941). Here we shall limit ourselves only to an axially symmetrical ellipsoid where R ₁>R ₂=R ₃ for a prolate spheroid and R ₁<R ₂=R ₃ for an oblate spheroid. The depolarizing factor for the prolate spheroid along the symmetry axis is:

$$ L_z = {{1 - e^2 } \over {2e^3 }}\left[ {\log {{1 + e} \over {1 - e}} - 2e} \right],\;\;\;\;\;e = \sqrt {1 - \left( {R_2 /R_1 } \right)^2 } $$

(9)

and for the oblate spheroid is:

$$ L_z = {1 \over {e^3 }}\left[ {e - \sqrt {1 - e^2 } \arcsin e} \right],\;\;\;\;\;e = \sqrt {1 - \left( {R_1 /R_2 } \right)^2 } $$

(10)

The depolarizing factors in the other two directions can be calculated from the condition that the sum is equal to one:

$$ L_x = L_y = {1 \over 2}\left( {1 - L_z } \right) $$

(11)

If the z axis of the coordinate system is parallel to the symmetry axis of the spheroid, then the solution for the parallel and perpendicular orientations is:

$$ \matrix{ {\Delta \phi _{{\rm{i}} _\parallel} = zE{1 \over {1 - L_z }},} \hfill & {\Delta \phi _{{\rm{i}} _ \bot} = xE{1 \over {1 - L_x }}} \hfill \cr } $$

(12)

For a sphere where R ₁=R ₂=R, then L _x=L _y=L _z=1/3 and z=R cosϑ; thus from Eq. 12 we obtain:

$$\Delta \phi _{{\rm{i}} \parallel} = \Delta \phi _{{\rm{i}} \bot} = {3 \over 2}RE\cos \vartheta $$

(13)

which is the well-known Schwan equation (Eq. 1). See Table 1.

Table 1.

Depolarizing factors L _x, L _y and L _z and normalized maximal induced transmembrane potential Δφ_i/ER ₁ for an oblate spheroid or Δφ_i/ER ₂ for a prolate spheroid for different shapes and orientations. For a sphere (R ₁=R ₂) the normalized induced transmembrane potential is 1.5

	Depolarizing factors			Δφ_i,max/ER _1/2 ^a for different angles of orientation α
Shape	L _x	L _y	L _z	0°	15°	30°	45°	60°	75°	90°
Prolate, ρ=10/8	0.3620	0.3620	0.2760	1.360	1.351	1.329	1.299	1.266	1.237	1.220
Prolate, ρ=10/5	0.4130	0.4130	0.1740	1.200	1.180	1.120	1.037	0.946	0.873	0.842
Prolate, ρ=10/2	0.4720	0.4720	0.0560	1.056	1.023	0.932	0.790	0.618	0.453	0.375
Oblate, ρ=8/10	0.3030	0.3030	0.3940	1.291	1.305	1.324	1.354	1.380	1.401	1.408
Oblate, ρ=5/10	0.2364	0.2364	0.5272	1.042	1.061	1.111	1.174	1.235	1.279	1.292
Oblate, ρ=2/10	0.1250	0.1250	0.7500	0.789	0.818	0.888	0.976	1.051	1.112	1.132

^aFor a prolate spheroid, Δφ_i is maximal for parallel orientation (α=0°): $\Delta \phi _{{\rm{i}},\max } ({\rm{prolate}}) = {1 \over {1 - L_z }}$; for an oblate spheroid, Δφ_i is maximal for perpendicular orientation (α=90°): $\Delta \phi _{{\rm{i}},\max } ({\rm{oblate}}) = {1 \over {1 - L_x }}$

In its most general case the electric field orientation is defined by the angles α (Fig. 1c) and β:

$$ {\bf{E}} = \left( {\matrix{ {E_x } \cr {E_y } \cr {E_z } \cr } } \right) = E\left( {\matrix{ {\sin \alpha \cos \beta } \cr {\sin \alpha \sin \beta } \cr {\cos \alpha } \cr } } \right) $$

(14)

but without loss of generality we can always choose β=0 so the vector of the electric field lies in the xz plane. The point T(x, y, z) at the surface of the spheroid in the spherical coordinates can be written as:

$$ {\bf{r}} = \left( {\matrix{ x \cr y \cr z \cr } } \right) = \left| {\bf{r}} \right|\left( {\matrix{ {\sin \vartheta \cos \varphi } \cr {\sin \vartheta \sin \varphi } \cr {\cos \vartheta } \cr } } \right) $$

(15)

where the absolute value of ∣r∣ is:

$$ \left| {\bf{r}} \right| = {1 \over {\sqrt {{{\cos ^2 \vartheta } \over {R_1^2 }} + {{\sin ^2 \vartheta } \over {R_2^2 }}} }} $$

(16)

Introducing Eqs. 14, 15, 16 into Eq. 8, Δφ_i on an arbitrary oriented spheroid for an infinitely small membrane conductance can be obtained:

$$ \Delta \phi _{\rm{i}} = E{1 \over {\sqrt {{{\cos ^2 \vartheta } \over {R_1^2 }} + {{\sin ^2 \vartheta } \over {R_2^2 }}} }}\left( {\matrix{ {\sin \alpha \cos \beta } \cr {\sin \alpha \sin \beta } \cr {\cos \alpha } \cr } } \right)\left( {\matrix{ {{1 \over {1 - L_x }}\sin \vartheta \cos \varphi } \cr {{1 \over {1 - L_y }}\sin \vartheta \sin \varphi } \cr {{1 \over {1 - L_z }}\cos \vartheta } \cr } } \right) $$

(17)

For β=0 and presented in the Cartesian coordinate system, the above equation simplifies to:

$$ \Delta \phi _{\rm{i}} = E\sin \alpha {1 \over {1 - L_x }}x + E\cos \alpha {1 \over {1 - L_z }}z $$

(18)

This solution is the same as derived by Gimsa and Wachner (2001), only presented in a form that is analogous to the Schwan equation and already taking into account all simplifications that are valid for the cells. Thus from the solution for the induced potential in parallel and perpendicular orientations, one can calculate Δφ_i on an arbitrarily oriented spheroid by means of a linear combination of the two solutions. In other words, in the coordinate system of the spheroid the electric field has two components: in the x and z directions. Since the potential is a linear function, we can simply add the potential induced in the perpendicular direction and the one induced in the parallel direction.

Appendix B

For the calculation of the area where the critical transmembrane potential Δφ_c is exceeded, we have to integrate the surface on the spheroid in spheroidal coordinates τ, ϕ and σ (Korn and Korn 2000). The transformation from Cartesian coordinates to spheroidal coordinates for a prolate spheroid is defined by:

$$ \matrix{ {x^2 } \hfill & = \hfill & {\left( {R_1 ^2 - R_2 ^2 } \right)\left( {\sigma ^2 - 1} \right)\left( {1 - \tau ^2 } \right)\cos ^2 \varphi } \hfill & {\sigma > 1} \hfill \cr {y^2 } \hfill & = \hfill & {\left( {R_1 ^2 - R_2 ^2 } \right)\left( {\sigma ^2 - 1} \right)\left( {1 - \tau ^2 } \right)\sin ^2 \varphi } \hfill & {0 < \varphi < 2\pi } \hfill \cr z \hfill & = \hfill & {\sqrt {R_1 ^2 - R_2 ^2 } \sigma \tau } \hfill & { - 1 < \tau < 1} \hfill \cr } $$

(19)

and for oblate spheroid by:

$$ \matrix{ {x^2 } \hfill & = \hfill & {\left( {R_2 ^2 - R_1 ^2 } \right)\left( {\sigma ^2 + 1} \right)\left( {1 - \tau ^2 } \right)\cos ^2 \varphi } \hfill & {\sigma > 0} \hfill \cr {y^2 } \hfill & = \hfill & {\left( {R_2 ^2 - R_1 ^2 } \right)\left( {\sigma ^2 + 1} \right)\left( {1 - \tau ^2 } \right)\sin ^2 \varphi } \hfill & {0 < \varphi < 2\pi } \hfill \cr z \hfill & = \hfill & {\sqrt {R_2 ^2 - R_1 ^2 } \sigma \tau } \hfill & { - 1 < \tau < 1} \hfill \cr } $$

(20)

The surface element in spheroidal coordinates is (Korn and Korn 2000):

$$ {\rm{d}}S = \sqrt {g_{\varphi \varphi } g_{\tau \tau } } \,{\rm{d}}\varphi \,{\rm{d}}\tau $$

(21)

where g _ϕϕ and g _ττ are elements of the metric tensor in spheroidal coordinates.

The equation of the surface of the spheroid is:

$$ S = R_2 \int\limits_{\tau _1 }^{\tau _2 } {\int\limits_{\varphi _1 }^{\varphi _2 } {\sqrt {R_1 ^2 \left( {1 - \tau ^2 } \right) + R_2 ^2 \tau ^2 } {\rm{d}}\varphi \,{\rm{d}}\tau } } $$

(22)

where ϕ₁, ϕ₂, τ₁ and τ₂ are borders of integration defined by the condition that Δφ_i = Δφ_c. As already mentioned, we analyzed Δφ_i on an ellipse, obtained from the cross-section of a spheroid with the xz plane. For two points on the ellipse where Δφ_c was exceeded, an ellipse on a spheroid through these two points can also be defined, which is perpendicular to plane xz. This ellipse represents our border of integration. The border of integration where Δφ_c has been exceeded is a closed curve on an ellipsoid which is nearly an ellipse. By transforming this ellipse into spheroidal coordinates, the ϕ₁, ϕ₂, τ₁ and τ₂ values are obtained.

References

Bernhardt J, Pauly H (1973) On the generation of potential differences across the membranes of ellipsoidal cells in an alternating electrical field. Biophysik 10:89–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bier M, Hammer SM, Canaday DJ, Lee RC (1999) Kinetics of sealing for transient electropores in isolated mammalian skeletal muscle cells. Bioelectromagnetics 20:194–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Brock TD, Smith DW, Madigan MT (1984) Biology of microorganisms. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
Eynard N, Rodriguez F, Trotard J, Teissié J (1998) Electrooptics studies of Escherichia coli electropulsation: orientation, permeabilization, and gene transfer. Biophys J 75:2587–2596PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fear CE, Stuchly MA (1998) Modeling assemblies of biological cells exposed to electric eields. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:1259–1271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fricke H (1925) A mathematical treatment of the electrical conductivity and capacity of disperse systems. II. The capacity of conducting spheroids surrounded by a non-conducting membrane for a current of low frequency. Phys Rev 26:678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel B, Teissié J (1998) Fluorescence imaging in the millisecond time range of membrane electropermeabilisation of single cells using a rapid ultra-low-light intensifying detection system. Eur Biophys J 27:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimsa J, Wachner D (2001) Analytical description of the transmembrane voltage induced on arbitrarily oriented ellipsoidal and cylindrical cells. Biophys J 81:1888–1896PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hart FX, Marino AA (1982) ELF dosage in ellipsoidal model of men due to high voltage transmission lines. J Bioelec 1:129–154Google Scholar
Korn GA, Korn TM (2000) Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers. Dover, Mineola, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2000) Analytical description of transmembrane voltage induced by electric fields on spheroidal cells. Biophys J 79:670–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kotnik T, Bobanović F, Miklavčič D (1997) Sensitivity of transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields: a theoretical analysis. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 43:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasznai Z, Marian T, Balkay L, Emri M, Tron L (1994) Flow cytometric determination of absolute membrane potential of cells. J Photochem Photobiol 28:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklavčič D, Šemrov D, Mekid H, Mir LM (2000) A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1523:73–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
Miller CE, Henriqez CS (1988) Three-dimensional finite element solution for biopotentials: erythrocyte in an applied field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:712–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mir LM (2001) Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 53:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Neumann E (1989) The relaxation hysteresis of membrane electroporation. In: Neumann E, Sowers AE, Jordan CA (eds) Electroporation and electrofusion in cell biology. Plenum, New York, pp 61–82Google Scholar
Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pavlin M, Pavšelj N, Miklavčič D (2002) Dependence of induced transmembrane potential on cell density, arrangement, and cell position inside the cell system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49:605–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rols MP, Teissié J (1998) Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells to macromolecules: control by pulse duration. Biophys J 75:1415–1423PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rols MP, Delteil C, Golzio M, Dumond P, Cros S, Teissie J (1998a) In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma. Nat Biotechnol 16:168–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rols MP, Delteil C, Golzio M, Teissié J (1998b) In vitro and ex vivo electrically mediated permeabilization and gene transfer in murine melanoma. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 47:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satkauskas S, Bureau MF, Puc M, Mahfoudi A, Scherman D, Miklavcic D, Mir LM (2002) Mechanisms of in vivo DNA electrotransfer: respective contributions of cell electropermeabilization and DNA electrophoresis. Mol Ther 5:133–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Schwan HP (1957) Electrical properties of tissue and cell suspensions. Adv Biol Med Phys 5:147–209Google Scholar
Schwarz G, Saito M, Schwan HP (1965) On the orientation of nonspherical particles in an alternating electrical field. J Chem Phys 10:3562–3569Google Scholar
Šemrov D, Miklavčič D (1998) Calculation of the electrical parameters in electrochemotherapy of solid tumours in mice. Comput Biol Med 28:439–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Serša G, Čemažar M, Šemrov D, Miklavčič D (1996) Changing electrode orientation improves the efficacy of electrochemotherapy of solid tumors in mice. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 39:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars RW (1937) The properties of dielectrics containing semiconducting particles various shapes. J Inst Elec Eng 80:378–394Google Scholar
Stratton JA (1941) Electromagnetic theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Sukharev SI, Klenchin VA, Serov SM, Chernomordik LV, Chizmadzhev YA (1992) Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores. Biophys J 63:1320–1327PubMedGoogle Scholar
Susil R, Šemrov D, Miklavčič D (1998) Electric field-induced transmembrane potential depends on cell density and organization. Elec Magnetobiol 17:391–399Google Scholar
Teissié J, Blangero C (1984) Direct experimental evidence of the vectorial character of the interaction between electric pulses and cells in cell electrofusion. Biochim Biophys Acta 775:446–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
Teissié J, Rols MP (1993) An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. Biophys J 65:409–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tekle E, Astumian RD, Chock PB (1990) Electro-permeabilization of cell membranes: effect of the resting membrane potential. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 172:282–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
Weaver JC, Chizmadzhev YA (1996) Electroporation. In: Polk C, Postow E (eds) Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., USA, pp 247–274Google Scholar
Weaver JC, Powell KT (1989) Theory of electroporation. In: Neumann E, Sowers AE, Jordan CA (eds) Electroporation and electrofusion in cell biology. Plenum, New York, pp 111–112Google Scholar
Zimmermann U (1982) Electric field-mediated fusion and related electrical phenomena. Biochim Biophys Acta 694:227–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann U, Pilwat G, Riemann F (1974) Dielectric breakdown of cell membranes. Biophys J 14:881–899PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Blaž Valič
- 1
Muriel Golzio
- 2
Mojca Pavlin
- 1
Anne Schatz
- 2
Cecile Faurie
- 2
Bruno Gabriel
- 2
Justin Teissié
- 2
Marie-Pierre Rols
- 2
Damijan Miklavčič
- 1

1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
2.Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale du CNRS, UMR 5089ToulouseFrance

Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment

Abstract

Keywords

Abbreviations

Geometry

Electric

Notes

Acknowledgements

References

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Personalised recommendations

Cite article