Wild Bee Pollen Usage and Microbial Communities Co-vary Across Landscapes
Bees forage for pollen and nectar at flowers but simultaneously acquire pathogenic, commensal, and likely beneficial microbes from these same flowers. Characterizing pollen usage of wild bees is therefore crucial to their conservation yet remains a challenging task. To understand pollen usage across landscapes and how this affects microbial communities found in the pollen provisions collected from flowers, we studied the generalist small carpenter bee Ceratina australensis. We collected C. australensis nests from three different climatic zones across eastern and southern Australia. To characterize the plant, fungal, and bacterial composition of these pollen provisions, we used a metabarcoding and next-generation sequencing approach. We found that the species richness of plant types, fungi, and bacteria was highest in a subtropical zone compared to a temperate or a grassland zone. The composition of these communities also differentiated by zone, particularly in pollen composition and fungal communities. Moreover, pollen composition strongly correlated with fungal community composition, suggesting that variation in pollen usage across landscapes results in variation in microbial communities. While how these pollen usage and microbial community patterns affect bee health merits additional work, these data further our understanding of how flowering plant community composition affects not only the pollen usage of a generalist bee but also its associated microbial communities.
KeywordsMicrobiome Metabarcoding Pollen Yeast Polylecty
We thank Wyatt Shell and Rebecca Dew (UNH) for assistance with nest collections as well as Laura Leger (UCR) for assistance with pathogen screens.
US Department of Agriculture NIFA Hatch funds (CA-R-ENT-5109-H) to QSM and (NC1173) to SMR, National Science Foundation MSB-ECA award #1638728 to QSM and National Science Foundation IOS-Behavior #1456296 to SMR, as well as National Geographic (9659-15) to SMR supported this research.
- 41.Atlas of Living Australia (2018) Available at: https://www.ala.org.au. Accessed 28 March 2018
- 42.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57:289–300Google Scholar
- 44.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al (2017) vegan: community ecology packageGoogle Scholar
- 47.McFrederick QS, Vuong HQ, Rothman JA (2018) Lactobacillus micheneri sp. nov., Lactobacillus timberlakei sp. nov. and Lactobacillus quenuiae sp. nov., lactic acid bacteria isolated from wild bees and flowers. Int J Syst Evol Microbial 68:1879–1884. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Batra L, Batra S, Bohart G (1973) The mycoflora of domesticated and wild bees (Apoidea). Mycopathologia 49:13–44Google Scholar
- 57.Ambika Manirajan B, Ratering S, Rusch V et al (2016) Bacterial microbiota associated with flower pollen is influenced by pollination type, and shows a high degree of diversity and species-specificity. Environ Microbiol 18:5161–5174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13524 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.Lenaerts M, Lenaerts M, Álvarez-Pérez S et al (2014) Rosenbergiella australoborealis sp. nov., Rosenbergiella collisarenosi sp. nov. and Rosenbergiella epipactidis sp. nov., three novel bacterial species isolated from floral nectar. Syst Appl Microbiol 37:402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.03.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar