Microbial Ecology

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 734–738 | Cite as

Whole-Genome Enrichment Provides Deep Insights into Vibrio cholerae Metagenome from an African River

  • L. VezzulliEmail author
  • C. Grande
  • G. Tassistro
  • I. Brettar
  • M. G. Höfle
  • R. P. A. Pereira
  • D. Mushi
  • A. Pallavicini
  • P. Vassallo
  • C. Pruzzo
Notes and Short Communications


The detection and typing of Vibrio cholerae in natural aquatic environments encounter major methodological challenges related to the fact that the bacterium is often present in environmental matrices at very low abundance in nonculturable state. This study applied, for the first time to our knowledge, a whole-genome enrichment (WGE) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach for direct genotyping and metagenomic analysis of low abundant V. cholerae DNA (<50 genome unit/L) from natural water collected in the Morogoro river (Tanzania). The protocol is based on the use of biotinylated RNA baits for target enrichment of V. cholerae metagenomic DNA via hybridization. An enriched V. cholerae metagenome library was generated and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform. Up to 1.8 × 107 bp (4.5× mean read depth) were found to map against V. cholerae reference genome sequences representing an increase of about 2500 times in target DNA coverage compared to theoretical calculations of performance for shotgun metagenomics. Analysis of metagenomic data revealed the presence of several V. cholerae virulence and virulence associated genes in river water including major virulence regions (e.g. CTX prophage and Vibrio pathogenicity island-1) and genetic markers of epidemic strains (e.g. O1-antigen biosynthesis gene cluster) that were not detectable by standard culture and molecular techniques. Overall, besides providing a powerful tool for direct genotyping of V. cholerae in complex environmental matrices, this study provides a ‘proof of concept’ on the methodological gap that might currently preclude a more comprehensive understanding of toxigenic V. cholerae emergence from natural aquatic environments.


Vibrio cholerae Africa Next-generation sequencing Whole-genome enrichment 



We are particularly indebted to Dr. Alison Devault (MYcroarray, USA) for helpful assistance and advice in WGE analysis. This work was supported by the European FP7 project ‘Protecting the health of Europeans by improving methods for the detection of pathogens in drinking water and water used in food preparation’—AQUAVALENS (grant number 311846). The HORIZON2020 project ‘Preventing and mitigating farmed bivalve disease—VIVALDI (grant number 678589)’ is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

248_2016_902_MOESM1_ESM.docx (64 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 63.6 kb)


  1. 1.
    Colwell RR (1996) Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm. Science 274:2031–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu HS, Roberts N, Singleton FL, Attwell RW, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR (1982) Survival and viability of nonculturable Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microb Ecol 8:313–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vezzulli L, Stauder M, Grande C, Pezzati E, Verheye HM, Owens NJP et al (2015) gbpA as a novel qPCR target for the species-specific detection of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139, non-O1/non-O139 in environmental, stool, and historical continuous plankton recorder samples. PLoS ONE 10:e0123983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123983 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J, Rogov P, LeProust EM, Brockman W et al (2009) Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 27(2):182–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen LH, Xiong ZH, Sun LL, Yang J, Jin Q (2012) VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D641–D645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu B, Pop M (2009) ARDB-antibiotic resistance genes database. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D443–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burrus V, Quezada-Calvillo R, Marrero J, Waldor MK (2006) SXT-related integrating conjugative element in new world Vibrio cholerae. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(4):3054–3057CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acosta CJ, Galindo CM, Kimario J, Senkoro K, Urassa H, Casals C et al (2001) Cholera outbreak in Southern Tanzania: risk factors and patterns of transmission. Emerg Infect Dis 7:583–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Naha A, Chowdhury G, Ghosh-Banerjee J, Senoh M, Takahashi T, Ley B et al (2013) Molecular characterization of high-level-cholera-toxin-producing El Tor variant Vibrio cholerae strains in the Zanzibar Archipelago of Tanzania. J Clin Microbiol 51:1040–1045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crecchio C, Stotzky G (1998) Binding of DNA on humic acids: effect on transformation of Bacillus subtilis and resistance to DNase. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1061–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP, Rykova EY (2007) Extracellular nucleic acids. Bioessays 29(7):654–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen KM, Johnsen PJ, Bensasson D, Daffonchio D (2007) Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environ Biosaf Res 6:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blokesch M, Schoolnik GK (2007) Serogroup conversion of Vibrio cholerae in aquatic reservoirs. PLoS Pathog 3:733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV)University of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Vaccinology and Applied MicrobiologyHelmholtz Centre for Infection ResearchBraunschweigGermany
  3. 3.Department of Life SciencesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations