Microbial Ecology

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 621–632 | Cite as

Plant Host and Geographic Location Drive Endophyte Community Composition in the Face of Perturbation

  • Natalie ChristianEmail author
  • Courtney Sullivan
  • Noelle D. Visser
  • Keith Clay
Plant Microbe Interactions


All plants form symbioses with endophytic fungi, which affect host plant health and function. Most endophytic fungi are horizontally transmitted, and consequently, local environment and geographic location greatly influence endophyte community composition. Growing evidence also suggests that identity of the plant host (e.g., species, genotype) can be important in shaping endophyte communities. However, little is known about how disturbances to plants affect their fungal symbiont communities. The goal of this study was to test if disturbances, from both natural and anthropogenic sources, can alter endophyte communities independent of geographic location or plant host identity. Using the plant species white snakeroot (Ageratina altissima; Asteraceae), we conducted two experiments that tested the effect of perturbation on endophyte communities. First, we examined endophyte response to leaf mining insect activity, a natural perturbation, in three replicate populations. Second, for one population, we applied fungicide to plant leaves to test endophyte community response to an anthropogenic perturbation. Using culture-based methods and Sanger sequencing of fungal isolates, we then examined abundance, diversity, and community structure of endophytic fungi in leaves subjected to perturbations by leaf mining and fungicide application. Our results show that plant host individual and geographic location are the major determinants of endophyte community composition even in the face of perturbations. Unexpectedly, we found that leaf mining did not impact endophyte communities in white snakeroot, but fungicide treatment resulted in small but significant changes in endophyte community structure. Together, our results suggest that endophyte communities are highly resistant to biotic and anthropogenic disturbances.


Microbiome Fungi Disturbance Herbivory Fungicide Ageratina altissima 



We gratefully acknowledge financial support from Sigma Xi (NC), the Indiana Academy of Science (NC and NDV), the Indiana University Research and Teaching Preserve (NC) and the Indiana University Hutton Honors College (CS). NC was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship program. We thank M. Abolins-Abols, Q. Chai, L. Durden, L. Henry, Z. Shearin, A. Snyder, B. Whitaker, Y. Zhao, and an anonymous reviewer for their feedback on the manuscript, the Indiana University Research and Teaching Preserve for use of sampling sites, and the Indiana Molecular Biology Institute for sequencing assistance.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Lepage P, Leclerc MC, Joossens M et al (2013) A metagenomic insight into our gut’s microbiome. Gut 62:146–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Russell JA, Dubilier N, Rudgers JA (2014) Nature’s microbiome: introduction. Mol Ecol 23:1225–1237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Francino MP (2016) Antibiotics and the human gut microbiome: dysbioses and accumulation of resistances. Front Microbiol 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Röthig T, Ochsenkühn MA, Roik A et al (2016) Long-term salinity tolerance is accompanied by major restructuring of the coral bacterial microbiome. Mol Ecol 25:1308–1323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christian N, Whitaker BK, Clay K (2015) Microbiomes: unifying animal and plant systems through the lens of community ecology theory. Front Microbiol 6:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humphrey PT, Nguyen TT, Villalobos MM, Whiteman NK (2014) Diversity and abundance of phyllosphere bacteria are linked to insect herbivory. Mol Ecol 23:1497–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kandalepas D, Blum MJ, Van Bael SA (2015) Shifts in symbiotic endophyte communities of a foundational salt marsh grass following oil exposure from the deepwater horizon oil spill. PLoS ONE 10:1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nettles R, Watkins J, Ricks K et al (2016) Influence of pesticide seed treatments on rhizosphere fungal and bacterial communities and leaf fungal endophyte communities in maize and soybean. Appl Soil Ecol 102:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pedraza RO, Bellone CH, Carrizo de Bellone S et al (2009) Azospirillum inoculation and nitrogen fertilization effect on grain yield and on the diversity of endophytic bacteria in the phyllosphere of rice rainfed crop. Eur J Soil Biol 45:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U’Ren JM, Lutzoni F, Miadlikowska J et al (2012) Host and geographic structure of endophytic and endolichenic fungi at a continental scale. Am J Bot 99:898–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodriguez RJ, White JF, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182:314–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ernst M, Mendgen KW, Wirsel SGR (2003) Endophytic fungal mutualists: seed-borne Stagonospora spp. enhance reed biomass production in axenic microcosms. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:580–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnold A, Mejía L, Kyllo D et al (2003) Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:15649–15654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bae H, Sicher RC, Kim MS et al (2009) The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao. J Exp Bot 60:3279–3295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clay K, Hardy T, Hammond A Jr (1985) Fungal endophytes of grasses and their effects on an insect herbivore. Oecologia 66:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herre EA, Mejía LC, Kyllo DA et al (2007) Ecological implications of anti-pathogen effects of tropical fungal endophytes and mycorrhizae. Ecology 88:550–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panaccione DG, Beaulieu WT, Cook D (2014) Bioactive alkaloids in vertically transmitted fungal endophytes. Funct Ecol 28:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christian N, Whitaker BK, Clay K (2016, in press) A novel framework for decoding fungal endophyte diversity. In: Dighton J and White JF (ed) The Fungal Community: its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem, 4th edn. CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaneko R, Kaneko S (2004) The effect of bagging branches on levels of endophytic fungal infection in Japanese beech leaves. For Pathol 34:65–78Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herrera CM, De Vega C, Canto A, Pozo MI (2009) Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey. Ann Bot 103:1415–1423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arnold AE, Maynard Z, Gilbert GS et al (2000) Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecol Lett 3:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimmerman NB, Vitousek PM (2012) Fungal endophyte communities reflect environmental structuring across a Hawaiian landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:13022–13027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mei L, Zhu M, Zhang DZ et al (2014) Geographical and temporal changes of foliar fungal endophytes associated with the invasive plant Ageratina adenophora. Microb Ecol 67:402–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    David AS, Seabloom EW, May G (2015) Plant host species and geographic distance affect the structure of aboveground fungal symbiont communities, and environmental filtering affects belowground communities in a coastal dune ecosystem. Microb Ecol 71:912–926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pan JJ, May G (2009) Fungal-fungal associations affect the assembly of endophyte communities in maize (Zea mays). Microb Ecol 58:668–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bálint M, Bartha L, O’Hara R et al (2015) Relocation, high-latitude warming and host genetic identity shape the foliar fungal microbiome of poplars. Mol Ecol 24:235–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Estrada C, Wcislo WT, Van Bael SA (2013) Symbiotic fungi alter plant chemistry that discourages leaf-cutting ants. New Phytol 198:241–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Estrada C, Degner EC, Rojas EI et al (2015) The role of endophyte diversity in protecting plants from defoliation by leaf-cutting ants. Curr Sci 109:19–25Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahlholm J, Helander M, Elamo P et al (2002) Micro-fungi and invertebrate herbivores on birch trees: fungal mediated plant-herbivore interactions or responses to host quality? Ecol Lett 5:648–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weis AE (1982) Use of symbiotic fungus by the gall maker Asteromyia carbonifera to inhibit attack by the parasitoid Torymus capite. Ecology 63:1602–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lawson SP, Christian N, Abbot P (2014) Comparative analysis of the biodiversity of fungal endophytes in insect-induced galls and surrounding foliar tissue. Fungal Divers 66:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yamazaki K (2010) Leaf mines as visual defensive signals to herbivores. Oikos 119:796–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson D, Carroll G (1997) Avoidance of high-endophyte space by gall-forming insects. Ecology 78:2153–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Faeth SH, Hammon KE (1997) Fungal endophytes in oak trees: long-term patterns of abundance and associations with leafminers. Ecology 78:810–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilson D, Faeth SH (2001) Do fungal endophytes result in selection for leafminer ovipositional preference? Ecology 82:1097–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gange AC, Dey S, Currie AF, Sutton BC (2007) Site- and species-specific differences in endophyte occurrence in two herbaceous plants. J Ecol 95:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fuentes-Ramírez LE, Caballero-Mellado J, Sepúlveda J, Martínez-Romero E (1999) Colonization of sugarcane by Acetobacter diazotrophicus is inhibited by high N-fertilization. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seghers D, Wittebolle L, Top EM et al (2004) Impact of agricultural practices on the Zea mays L. endophytic community. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1475–1482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Helander ML, Neuvonen S, Sieber T, Petrini O (1993) Simulated acid rain affects birch leaf endophyte populations. Microb Ecol 26:227–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang YL, Devan MMN, U’Ren JM et al (2015) Pervasive effects of wildfire on foliar endophyte communities in montane forest trees. Microb Ecol 71:452–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fischer MS, Rodriguez RJ (2013) Fungal endophytes of invasive Phagramites australis populations vary in species composition and fungicide susceptibility. Symbiosis 61:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Clewell AF, Wooten JW (1971) A Revision of Ageratina (Compositae: Eupatorieae) from Eastern North America. Brittonia 23:123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Davis TZ, Lee ST, Collett MG et al (2015) Toxicity of white snakeroot (Ageratina altissima) and chemical extracts of white snakeroot in goats. J Agric Food Chem 63:2092–2097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Spencer KA, Steyskal GC (1986) Manual of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) of the United States.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mejía L, Rojas EI, Maynard Z et al (2008) Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens. Biol Control 46:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protoc. A Guid. to Methods Appl. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Del Olmo-Ruiz M, Arnold AE (2014) Interannual variation and host affiliations of endophytic fungi associated with ferns at La Selva, Costa Rica. Mycologia 106:8–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Deshpande V, Wang Q, Greenfield P et al (2016) Fungal identification using a Bayesian classifier and the Warcup training set of internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mycologia 108:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hassall KA (1990) The biochemistry and uses of pesticides: structure, metabolism, mode of action and uses in crop protection, 2nd edn. VCH Publishers, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s Guide and application at <>.
  51. 51.
    Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL R Found. Stat. Comput. Vienna, Austria
  53. 53.
    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R et al (2013) Package “vegan”. R Packag ver 20–8:254Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science BV, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM, Newcombe G et al (2014) Fungal endophyte increases the allelopathic effects of an invasive forb. Oecologia 175:285–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rojas EI, Rehner SA, Samuels GJ et al (2010) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides s.l. associated with Theobroma cacao and other plants in Panama: multilocus phylogenies distinguish host-associated pathogens from asymptomatic endophytes. Mycologia 102:1318–1338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Serdani M, Rooney-Latham S, Wallis KM, Blomquist CL (2013) First report of Colletotrichum phormii causing anthracnose on New Zealand flax the United States. Plant Dis 97:1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lima NB, Marcus MV, De Morais MA et al (2013) Five Colletotrichum species are responsible for mango anthracnose in northeastern Brazil. Fungal Divers 61:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Berner D, Cavin C (2011) Leaf anthracnose, a new disease of swallow-worts caused by Colletotrichum lineola from Russia. Plant Dis 95:1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Helander M, Ahlholm J, Sieber TN et al (2007) Fragmented environment affects birch leaf endophytes. New Phytol 175:547–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Preszler RW, Gaylord ES, Boecklen WJ et al (1996) Reduced parasitism of a leaf-mining moth on trees with high infection frequencies of an endophytic fungus. Oecologia 108:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sempere F, Santamarina MP (2008) Biological control of one species belonging to the dominant mycobiota of rice of Valencia. Ann Microbiol 58:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Carvalho CR, Gonçalves VN, Pereira CB et al (2012) The diversity, antimicrobial and anticancer activity of endophytic fungi associated with the medicinal plant Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) Coville (Fabaceae) from the Brazilian savannah. Symbiosis 57:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gond SK, Mishra A, Sharma VK et al (2012) Diversity and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from Nyctanthes arbor-tristis, a well-known medicinal plant of India. Mycoscience 53:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lawrie A (2011) Using the fungus Nigrospora oryzae for the biological control of giant parramatta grass. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Bundoora, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Li YC, Yang Y (2015) On the paradox of pesticides. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 29:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wilson C, Tisdell C (2001) Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecol Econ 39:449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Busby PE, Ridout M, Newcombe G (2016) Fungal endophytes: modifiers of plant disease. Plant Mol Biol 90(6):645–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rodriguez Estrada AE, Hegeman A, Kistler HC, May G (2011) In vitro interactions between Fusarium verticillioides and Ustilago maydis through real-time PCR and metabolic profiling. Fungal Genet Biol 48:874–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hartley SE, Eschen R, Horwood JM et al (2015) Infection by a foliar endophyte elicits novel arabidopside-based plant defence reactions in its host, Cirsium arvense. New Phytol 205:816–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evolution, Ecology and Behavior Program, Department of BiologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Medical Sciences ProgramIndiana University School of MedicineBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations