Protozoan Predation Is Differentially Affected by Motility of Enteric Pathogens in Water vs. Sediments
- 362 Downloads
Survival of enteric bacteria in aquatic habitats varies depending upon species, strain, and environmental pressures, but the mechanisms governing their fate are poorly understood. Although predation by protozoa is a known, top-down control mechanism on bacterial populations, its influence on the survival of fecal-derived pathogens has not been systematically studied. We hypothesized that motility, a variable trait among pathogens, can influence predation rates and bacterial survival. We compared the survival of two motile pathogens of fecal origin by culturing Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium. Each species had a motile and non-motile counterpart and was cultured in outdoor microcosms with protozoan predators (Tetrahymena pyriformis) present or absent. Motility had a significant, positive effect on S. enterica levels in water and sediment in the presence or absence of predators. In contrast, motility had a significant negative effect on E. coli O157 levels in sediment, but did not affect water column levels. The presence/absence of protozoa consistently accounted for a greater proportion of the variability in bacterial levels (>95 %) than in bacterial motility (<4 %) in the water column. In sediments, however, motility was more important than predation for both bacteria. Calculations of total CFU/microcosm showed decreasing bacterial concentrations over time under all conditions except for S. enterica in the absence of predation, which increased ∼0.5–1.0 log over 5 days. These findings underscore the complexity of predicting the survival of enteric microorganisms in aquatic habitats, which has implications for the accuracy of risk assessment and modeling of water quality.
KeywordsEnteric Bacterium O157 Strain Motile Bacterium Total Bacterial Number Spatial Block
We would like to acknowledge Dr. James Riordan (University of South Florida) for providing us with the E. coli O157 strains. We would also like to thank Laura Walker and Dr. Gordon Fox for affording us access and green house space at the USF Botanical Gardens, respectively. Lastly, we would like to acknowledge all the members of the Harwood lab for all their help with this research.
- 3.Islam M, Morgan J, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang X (2004) Persistence of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium on lettuce and parsley and in soils on which they were grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation water. Foodborne Pathog Dis 1:27–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Davies CM, Evison LM (1991) Sunlight and the survival of enteric bacteria in natural waters. J Appl Microbiol 70:265–274Google Scholar
- 17.LeJeune JT, Besser TE, Rice DH, Berg JL, Stilborn RP, Hancock DD (2004) Longitudinal study of fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feedlot cattle: predominance and persistence of specific clonal types despite massive cattle population turnover. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:377–384PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Alpers K, Werber D, Frank C, Koch J, Friedrich AW, Karch H, An DERHM, Prager R, Fruth A, Bielaszewska M, Morlock G, Heissenhuber A, Diedler A, Gerber A, Ammon A (2009) Sorbitol-fermenting enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H- causes another outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in children. Epidemiol Infect 137:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Eaton AD, American Public Health A, American Water Works A, Water Environment F (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, D. CGoogle Scholar
- 43.Sleigh MA (1989) Protozoa and other protists. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 45.Bitton G (2002) Encyclopedia of environmental microbiology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 46.USEPA (2002) Method 1603: Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water by membrane filtration using modified membrane-thermotolerant Escherichia coli agar (modified mTEC). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water, Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 47.Boehm AB, Griffith J, McGee C, Edge TA, Solo-Gabriele HM, Whitman R, Cao Y, Getrich M, Jay JA, Ferguson D, Goodwin KD, Lee CM, Madison M, Weisberg SB (2009) Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand: a comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands. J Appl Microbiol 107:1740–1750PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Staley, ZR, Rohr, JR, Senkbeil, JK, Harwood, VJ (2014) Agrochemicals indirectly increase survival of E. coli O157:H7 and fecal indicator bacteria in fresh water by reducing ecosystem services. Ecol Appl doi: 10.1890/13-1242.1