Detecting the Nonviable and Heat-Tolerant Bacteria in Activated Sludge by Minimizing DNA from Dead Cells
- 684 Downloads
Propidium monoazide (PMA) has been used to determine viable microorganisms for clinical and environmental samples since selected naked DNA which was covalently cross-linked by this dye could not be PCR-amplified. In this study, we applied PMA to the activated sludge samples composed of complex bacterial populations to investigate the viability of human fecal bacteria and to determine the heat-tolerant bacteria by high-throughput sequencing of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) V3 region. The methodological evaluation suggested the validity, and about 2–3 magnitude signals decreasing from the stained DNA were observed. However, the nest PCR, which was previously conducted to further minimize signals from dead cells, seemed not suitable perhaps due to the limitation of the primers. On one hand, for typical human fecal bacteria, less than half of them were viable, and most genera exhibited the similar viable percentages. It was interesting that many “unclassified bacteria” showed low viability, implying their sensitivity to environmental change. On the other hand, after heating at 60 °C for 4 h, the bacteria with high survival rate in activated sludge samples included those reported thermophiles or heat-tolerant lineages, such as Anoxybacillus and diverse species in Actinobacteria, and some novel ones, such as Gp16 subdivision in Acidobacteria. In summary, our results took a glance at the fate of fecal bacteria during sewage treatment and established an example for identifying tolerant species to lethal shocks in a complex community.
KeywordsActivate Sludge Actinobacteria Aeration Tank Fecal Bacterium Activate Sludge Sample
The authors would like to thank the financial support from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (project no. HKU7190/12E). Dr. Feng Guo wants to thank the postdoctoral fellowship from the University of Hong Kong.
- 14.Nocker A, Richter-Heitmann T, Montijn R, Schuren F, Kort R (2010) Discrimination between live and dead cells in bacterial communities from environmental water samples analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing. Int Microbiol Off J Span Soc Microbiol 13(2):59–65Google Scholar
- 16.Seviour RJ, Nielsen PH (2010) Microbial communities in activated sludge plants. In: Seviour RJ, Nielsen PH (eds) Microbial ecology of activated sludge. IWA, London, pp 95–126Google Scholar
- 22.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(23):7537–7541PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Saw JH, Mountain BW, Feng L, Omelchenko MV, Hou S, Saito JA, Stott MB, Li D, Zhao G, Wu J, Galperin MY, Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Rigden DJ, Dunfield PF, Wang L, Alam M (2008) Encapsulated in silica: genome, proteome and physiology of the thermophilic bacterium Anoxybacillus flavithermus WK1. Genome Biol 9(11):R161PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar