Novel Microbial Populations in Deep Granitic Groundwater from Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland
- 414 Downloads
Freshwater aquifers in granitic rocks are widespread microbial habitats in the terrestrial subsurface. Microbial populations in deep granitic groundwater from two recently drilled (1 and 2 years) and two old boreholes (14 and 25 years) were compared. The 16S rRNA gene sequences related to “Candidatus Magnetobacterium bavaricum”, Thermodesulfovibrio spp. of Nitrospirae (90.5–93.1 % similarity) and a novel candidate division with <90 % similarity to known cultivated species were dominant in all boreholes. Most of the environmental clones closely related to the novel lineages in Nitrospirae, which have been detected exclusively in deep groundwater samples. In contrast, betaproteobacterial sequences related to the family Rhodocyclaceae were obtained only from the recently drilled boreholes, which had higher total cell numbers. Catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) analysis supported the result from clone library analysis; betaproteobacterial cells were dominantly detected in recently drilled boreholes. These results suggest that while indigenous microbial populations represented by the novel phylotypes persisted in the boreholes for 25 years, betaproteobacterial species disappeared after 2 years owing to the change of substrate availability.
KeywordsGroundwater Sample Carbon Isotopic Composition Sulfur Isotopic Composition Candidate Division Microbial Sulfate Reduction
We thank Dr. Rueedi, Dr. Martin, Dr. Blechschmidt, and Mr. Brand (Nagra) for coordination of our sampling. We are grateful to Mr. Tonooka Mrs. Shuin, and Mrs. Nakamura for their technical assistance with geochemical and microbial analysis. This study was supported by grants from the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA).
- 1.Alonso EE, Alcoverro J, Coste F, Malinsky L, Merrien-Soukatchoff V, Kadiri I, Nowak T, Shao H, Nguyen TS, Selvadurai APS, Armand G, Sobolik SR, Itamura M, Stone CM, Webb SW, Rejeb A, Tijani M, Maouche Z, Kobayashi A, Kurikami H, Ito A, Sugita Y, Chijimatsu M, Börgesson L, Hernelind J, Rutqvist J, Tsnag C-F, Jussila P (2005) The FEBEX benchmark test: case definition and comparison of modeling approaches. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:611–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Colwell FS, Stormberg GJ, Phelps TJ, Birnbaum SA, McKinley J, Rawson SA, Veverka C, Goodwin S, Long PE, Russell BF, Garland T, Thompson D, Skinner P, Grover S (1992) Innovative techniques for collection of saturated and unsaturated subsurface basalts and sediments for microbiological characterization. J Microbiol Methods 15:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kalyuzhnaya MG, De Marco P, Bowerman S, Pacheco CC, Lara JC, Lidstrom ME, Chistoserdova L (2006) Methyloversatilis universalis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel taxon within the Betaproteobacteria represented by three methylotrophic isolates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2517–2522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, pp 115–175Google Scholar
- 24.Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G, Förster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, König A, Liss T, Lüßmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer K-H (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Pedersen K, Arlinger J, Ekendahl S, Hallbeck L (1996) 16S rRNA gene diversity of attached and unattached bacteria in boreholes along the access tunnel to the Aspo hard rock laboratory, Sweden. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 19:249–262Google Scholar
- 34.Pedersen K, Arlinger J, Eriksson S, Hallbeck A, Hallbeck L, Johansson J (2008) Numbers, biomass and cultivable diversity of microbial populations relate to depth and borehole-specific conditions in groundwater from depths of 4–450 m in Olkiluoto, Finland. ISME J 2:760–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Richardson SM, McSween HY Jr (1989) Geochemistry: pathways and processes. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- 39.Stroes-Gascoyne S, Hamonet CJ, Audette-Stuart M, Beaton D, King-Sharp K, Festarini A, Serran M, McMullin D, Kramer- Tremblay S, Rose S, Bellan L (2011) Microbial characterization of groundwater from boreholes CR9 and CR18 at CRL(2007–2009)—Implications for a possible future repository for radioactive non-fuel waste. In: Proceedings of CNS Conference on Waste Management, Decommissioning and Restoration for Canada’s Nuclear Activities, September 11–14, Toronto, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 40.Takai K, Nakamura K, Toki T, Tsunogai U, Miyazaki M, Miyazaki J, Hirayama H, Nakagawa S, Nunoura T, Horikoshi K (2008) Cell proliferation at 122 degrees C and isotopically heavy CH4 production by a hyperthermophilic methanogen under high-pressure cultivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10949–10954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Tsunogai U, Yoshida N, Ishibashi J, Gamo T (2000) Carbon isotopic distribution of methane in deep-sea hydrothermal plume, Myojin Knoll Caldera, Izu-Bonin arc: implications for microbial methane oxidation in the oceans and applications to heat flux estimation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:2439–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar