Fungal Community Composition in Neotropical Rain Forests: the Influence of Tree Diversity and Precipitation
Plant diversity is considered one factor structuring soil fungal communities because the diversity of compounds in leaf litter might determine the extent of resource heterogeneity for decomposer communities. Lowland tropical rain forests have the highest plant diversity per area of any biome. Since fungi are responsible for much of the decomposition occurring in forest soils, understanding the factors that structure fungi in tropical forests may provide valuable insight for predicting changes in global carbon and nitrogen fluxes. To test the role of plant diversity in shaping fungal community structure and function, soil (0–20 cm) and leaf litter (O horizons) were collected from six established 1-ha forest census plots across a natural plant diversity gradient on the Isthmus of Panama. We used 454 pyrosequencing and phospholipid fatty acid analysis to evaluate correlations between microbial community composition, precipitation, soil nutrients, and plant richness. In soil, the number of fungal taxa increased significantly with increasing mean annual precipitation, but not with plant richness. There were no correlations between fungal communities in leaf litter and plant diversity or precipitation, and fungal communities were found to be compositionally distinct between soil and leaf litter. To directly test for effects of plant species richness on fungal diversity and function, we experimentally re-created litter diversity gradients in litter bags with 1, 25, and 50 species of litter. After 6 months, we found a significant effect of litter diversity on decomposition rate between one and 25 species of leaf litter. However, fungal richness did not track plant species richness. Although studies in a broader range of sites is required, these results suggest that precipitation may be a more important factor than plant diversity or soil nutrient status in structuring tropical forest soil fungal communities.
KeywordsMicrobial Biomass Leaf Litter Fungal Community Plant Species Richness Tropical Rain Forest
We thank Joe Wright and Osvaldo Calderon for collection and identification of all litter species in the decomposition experiment. Collecting and export permits were granted from the Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente of Panama. Jenny Talbot and Angela Nguyen assisted with C and N measurements, and Steve Allison and Donovan German helped with extracellular enzyme assays and data interpretation. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for helping to improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript. This work was funded by NSF Ecosystems (DEB-0640666) and the Kearney Foundation.
- 4.Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Jairus T, Sadam A, Saar I, Bahram M, Bechem E, Chuyong G, Koljalg U (2010) 454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. New Phytol 188:291–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Powers JS, Montgomery RA, Adair EC, Brearley FQ, DeWalt SJ, Castanho CT, Chave J, Deinert E, Ganzhorn JU, Gilbert ME, Gonzalez-Iturbe JA, Bunyavejchewin S, Grau HR, Harms KE, Hiremath A, Iriarte-Vivar S, Manzane E, de Oliveira AA, Poorter L, Ramanamanjato JB, Salk C, Varela A, Weiblen GD, Lerdau MT (2009) Decomposition in tropical forests: a pan-tropical study of the effects of litter type, litter placement and mesofaunal exclusion across a precipitation gradient. J Ecol 97:801–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Berg B, McClaugherty C (2003) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 20.McGuire KL, Bent E, Borneman J, Majumder A, Allison SD, Treseder KK (2010) Functional diversity in resource use by fungi. Ecology. doi: 10.1890/09-0654
- 32.Leigh EG, Loo de Lao S, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Pérez R (2004) Barro Colorado Island forest dynamics plot, Panama. In: Losos EC, Leigh EG (eds) Tropical forest diversity and dynamism: findings from a large-scale plot network. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 451–463Google Scholar
- 40.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Tumbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.White DC, Stair JO, Ringelberg DB (1997) Quantitative comparisons of in situ microbial biodiversity by signature biomarker analysis. J Ind Microbiol 17:185–196Google Scholar