Microbial Ecology

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 348–357 | Cite as

A Molecular Enrichment Strategy Based on cpn60 for Detection of Epsilon-Proteobacteria in the Dog Fecal Microbiome

  • Bonnie Chaban
  • Matthew G. Links
  • Janet E. HillEmail author


Members of the rare microbiome can be important components of complex microbial communities. For example, pet dog ownership is a known risk factor for human campylobacteriosis, and Campylobacter is commonly detected in dog feces by targeted assays. However, these organisms have not been detected by metagenomic methods. The goal of this study was to characterize fecal microbiota from healthy and diarrheic pet dogs using two different levels of molecular detection. PCR amplification and pyrosequencing of the universal cpn60 gene target was used to obtain microbial profiles from each dog. To investigate the relatively rare epsilon-proteobacteria component of the microbiome, a molecular enrichment was carried out using a PCR that first amplified the cpn10–cpn60 region from epsilon-proteobacteria, followed by universal cpn60 target amplification and pyrosequencing. From the non-enriched survey, the major finding was a significantly higher proportion of Bacteroidetes, notably Bacteroides vulgatus, in healthy dogs compared to diarrheic dogs. Epsilon-proteobacteria from the genera Helicobacter and Campylobacter were also detected at a low level in the non-enriched profiles of some dogs. Molecular enrichment increased the proportion of epsilon-proteobacteria sequences detected from each dog, as well as identified novel, presumably rare sequences not seen in the non-enriched profiles. Enriched profiles contained known species of Arcobacter, Campylobacter, Flexispira, and Helicobacter and identified two possibly novel species. These findings add to our understanding of the canine fecal microbiome in general, the epsilon-proteobacteria component specifically, and present a novel modification to traditional metagenomic approaches for study of the rare microbiome.


Bacteroidetes Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Fecal Microbiota Fecal Microbiome Enrich Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was funded by the WCVM Companion Animal Health Fund and the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation. BC was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation. The authors are grateful to Manuel Chirino for donating the genomic DNA used in epsilon-enrichment primer development.

Supplementary material

248_2011_9931_MOESM1_ESM.ppt (1.6 mb)
(PPT 1613 kb)


  1. 1.
    Reeder J, Knight R (2009) The ’rare biosphere’: a reality check. Nat Methods 6:636–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12:118–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ipsos-Reid (2001) Paws and claws: a syndicated study on Canadian pet ownership. Ipsos-Reid, Toronto, pp 1–176Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    AVMA (2007) US Pet ownership and demographics sourcebook. American Veterinary Medical Association, SchaumburgGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fullerton KE, Ingram LA, Jones TF, Anderson BJ, McCarthy PV, Hurd S, Shiferaw B, Vugia D, Haubert N, Hayes T, Wedel S, Scallan E, Henao O, Angulo FJ (2007) Sporadic Campylobacter infection in infants: a population-based surveillance case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26:19–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tenkate TD, Stafford RJ (2001) Risk factors for campylobacter infection in infants and young children: a matched case-control study. Epidemiol Infect 127:399–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carrique-Mas J, Andersson Y, Hjertqvist M, Svensson A, Torner A, Giesecke J (2005) Risk factors for domestic sporadic campylobacteriosis among young children in Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis 37:101–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai HJ, Huang HC, Lin CM, Lien YY, Chou CH (2007) Salmonellae and campylobacters in household and stray dogs in northern Taiwan. Vet Res Commun 31:931–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossi M, Hanninen ML, Revez J, Hannula M, Zanoni RG (2008) Occurrence and species level diagnostics of Campylobacter spp., enteric Helicobacter spp. and Anaerobiospirillum spp. in healthy and diarrheic dogs and cats. Vet Microbiol 129:304–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engvall EO, Brandstrom B, Andersson L, Baverud V, Trowald-Wigh G, Englund L (2003) Isolation and identification of thermophilic Campylobacter species in faecal samples from Swedish dogs. Scand J Infect Dis 35:713–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hald B, Pedersen K, Waino M, Jorgensen JC, Madsen M (2004) Longitudinal study of the excretion patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in young pet dogs in Denmark. J Clin Microbiol 42:2003–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koene MG, Houwers DJ, Dijkstra JR, Duim B, Wagenaar JA (2004) Simultaneous presence of multiple Campylobacter species in dogs. J Clin Microbiol 42:819–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bell JA, Kopper JJ, Turnbull JA, Barbu NI, Murphy AJ, Mansfield LS (2008) Ecological characterization of the colonic microbiota of normal and diarrheic dogs. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2008:149694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gronvøld AM, L’Abée-Lund TM, Sørum H, Skancke E, Yannarell AC, Mackie RI (2010) Changes in fecal microbiota of healthy dogs administered amoxicillin. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:313–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaban B, Ngeleka M, Hill JE (2010) Detection and quantification of 14 Campylobacter species in pet dogs reveals an increase in species richness in feces of diarrheic animals. BMC Microbiol 10:73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suchodolski JS (2011) Microbes and gastrointestinal health of dogs and cats. J Anim Sci 89:1520–1530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swanson KS, Dowd SE, Suchodolski JS, Middelbos IS, Vester BM, Barry KA, Nelson KE, Torralba M, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Cann IK, White BA, Fahey GC Jr (2011) Phylogenetic and gene-centric metagenomics of the canine intestinal microbiome reveals similarities with humans and mice. ISME J 5:639–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Handl S, Dowd SE, Garcia-Mazcorro JF, Steiner JM, Suchodolski JS (2011) Massive parallel 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse fecal bacterial and fungal communities in healthy dogs and cats. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76:301–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Middelbos IS, Vester Boler BM, Qu A, White BA, Swanson KS, Fahey GC Jr (2010) Phylogenetic characterization of fecal microbial communities of dogs fed diets with or without supplemental dietary fiber using 454 pyrosequencing. PLoS One 5:e9768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davis CP, Cleven D, Balish E, Yale CE (1977) Bacterial association in the gastrointestinal tract of beagle dogs. Appl Environ Microbiol 34:194–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simpson JM, Martineau B, Jones WE, Ballam JM, Mackie RI (2002) Characterization of fecal bacterial populations in canines: effects of age, breed and dietary fiber. Microb Ecol 44:186–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greetham HL, Giffard C, Hutson RA, Collins MD, Gibson GR (2002) Bacteriology of the Labrador dog gut: a cultural and genotypic approach. J Appl Microbiol 93:640–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mentula S, Harmoinen J, Heikkilä M, Westermarck E, Rautio M, Huovinen P, Könönen E (2005) Comparison between cultured small-intestinal and fecal microbiotas in beagle dogs. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4169–4175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jia J, Frantz N, Khoo C, Gibson GR, Rastall RA, McCartney AL (2010) Investigation of the faecal microbiota associated with canine chronic diarrhoea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:304–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schellenberg J, Links MG, Hill JE, Dumonceaux TJ, Peters GA, Tyler S, Ball TB, Severini A, Plummer FA (2009) Pyrosequencing of the chaperonin-60 universal target as a tool for determining microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2889–2898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hill JE, Town JR, Hemmingsen SM (2006) Improved template representation in cpn60 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product libraries generated from complex templates by application of a specific mixture of PCR primers. Environ Microbiol 8:741–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schellenberg J, Links MG, Hill JE, Hemmingsen SM, Peters GA, Dumonceaux TJ (2011) Pyrosequencing of chaperonin-60 (cpn60) amplicons as a means of determining microbial community composition. Methods Mol Biol 733:143–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hill JE, Penny SL, Crowell KG, Goh SH, Hemmingsen SM (2004) cpnDB: a chaperonin sequence database. Genome Res 14:1669–1675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–8235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R (2006) UniFrac—an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformatics 7:371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sakamoto M, Suzuki N, Benno Y (2010) hsp60 and 16S rRNA gene sequence relationships among species of the genus Bacteroides with the finding that Bacteroides suis and Bacteroides tectus are heterotypic synonyms of Bacteroides pyogenes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2984–2990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Desai AR, Musil KM, Carr AP, Hill JE (2009) Characterization and quantification of feline fecal microbiota using cpn60 sequence-based methods and investigation of animal-to-animal variation in microbial population structure. Vet Microbiol 137:120–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mansfield GS, Desai AR, Nilson SA, Van Kessel AG, Drew MD, Hill JE (2010) Characterization of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) intestinal microbiota and inflammatory marker gene expression in a recirculating aquaculture system. Aquaculture 307:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dumonceaux TJ, Hill JE, Hemmingsen SM, Van Kessel AG (2006) Characterization of intestinal microbiota and response to dietary virginiamycin supplementation in the broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2815–2823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hill JE, Fernando WM, Zello GA, Tyler RT, Dahl WJ, Van Kessel AG (2010) Improvement of the representation of bifidobacteria in fecal microbiota metagenomic libraries by application of the cpn60 universal primer cocktail. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4550–4552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI (2009) A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457:480–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fierer N, Lauber CL, Zhou N, McDonald D, Costello EK, Knight R (2010) Forensic identification using skin bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6477–6481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R (2009) Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326:1694–1697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI (2006) Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444:1022–1023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Round JL, Mazmanian SK (2010) Inducible Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell development by a commensal bacterium of the intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12204–12209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Suchodolski JS, Camacho J, Steiner JM (2008) Analysis of bacterial diversity in the canine duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon by comparative 16S rRNA gene analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66:567–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F, Flahou B, Chiers K, Baele M, Meyns T, Decostere A, Ducatelle R (2009) Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:202–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Harbour S, Sutton P (2008) Immunogenicity and pathogenicity of Helicobacter infections of veterinary animals. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 122:191–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie Chaban
    • 1
  • Matthew G. Links
    • 1
    • 2
  • Janet E. Hill
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and AgriFood CanadaSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations