Culturable Diversity of Heterotrophic Bacteria in Forlidas Pond (Pensacola Mountains) and Lundström Lake (Shackleton Range), Antarctica
- 576 Downloads
Cultivation techniques were used to study the heterotrophic bacterial diversity in two microbial mat samples originating from the littoral zone of two continental Antarctic lakes (Forlidas Pond and Lundström Lake) in the Dufek Massif (within the Pensacola Mountains group of the Transantarctic Mountains) and Shackleton Range, respectively. Nearly 800 isolates were picked after incubation on several growth media at different temperatures. They were grouped using a whole-genome fingerprinting technique, repetitive element palindromic PCR and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of 82 representatives showed that the isolates belonged to four major phylogenetic groups: Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. A relatively large difference between the samples was apparent. Forlidas Pond is a completely frozen water body underlain by hypersaline brine, with summer thaw forming a slightly saline littoral moat. This was reflected in the bacterial diversity with a dominance of isolates belonging to Firmicutes, whereas isolates from the freshwater Lundström Lake revealed a dominance of Actinobacteria. A total of 42 different genera were recovered, including first records from Antarctica for Albidiferax, Bosea, Curvibacter, Luteimonas, Ornithinibacillus, Pseudoxanthomonas, Sphingopyxis and Spirosoma. Additionally, a considerable number of potential new species and new genera were recovered distributed over different phylogenetic groups. For several species where previously only the type strain was available in cultivation, we report additional strains. Comparison with public databases showed that overall, 72% of the phylotypes are cosmopolitan whereas 23% are currently only known from Antarctica. However, for the Bacteroidetes, the majority of the phylotypes recovered are at present known only from Antarctica and many of these represent previously unknown species.
Fieldwork by DAH and PC was supported by the British Antarctic Survey. This study was carried out in the framework of AMBIO, a project funded by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BelSPO) that contributes to IPY research proposal nr. 55 MERGE (Microbiological and Ecological Responses to Global Environmental Changes in Polar Regions). We thank the AMBIO project coordinator Annick Wilmotte. We are grateful to E. Verleyen and K. Van Hoorde for helpful discussion. The study also contributes to the BAS ‘Polar Science for Planet Earth’ and SCAR ‘Evolution and Biodiversity in Antarctica’ programmes.
- 22.Good IJ (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237–264Google Scholar
- 24.Hodgson DA, Convey P (2004) Sledge Bravo 2003–2004. BAS Signals in Antarctica of Past Global Changes. Dufek Massif—Pensacola Mountains. Mount Gass—Shackleton Mountains. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Report Ref R/2003/NT1 British Antarctic Survey CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 31.Krishnamurthi S, Bhattacharya A, Mayilraj S, Saha P, Schumann P, Chakrabarti T (2009) Description of Paenisporosarcina quisquiliarum gen. nov., sp. nov., and reclassification of Sporosarcina macmurdoensis Reddy et al. 2003 as Paenisporosarcina macmurdoensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:1364–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Logan NA, De Clerck E, Lebbe L, Verhelst A, Goris J, Forsyth G, Rodriguez-Diaz M, Heyndrickx M, De Vos P (2004) Paenibacillus cineris sp. nov. and Paenibacillus cookii sp. nov., from Antarctic volcanic soils and a gelatin-processing plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1071–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurements. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p 192Google Scholar
- 41.Peeters K, Ertz D, Willems A (2011) Culturable bacterial diversity at the Princess Elisabeth Station (Utsteinen, Sør Rondane Mountains, East Antarctica) harbours many new taxa. Syst Appl Microbiol (in press)Google Scholar
- 54.Stackebrandt E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revised: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006:153–155Google Scholar
- 55.Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM, Grimont PAD, Kampfer P, Maiden MCJ, Nesme X, Rossello-Mora R, Swings J, Trueper HG, Vauterin L, Ward AC, Whitman WB (2002) Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1043–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Vancanneyt M, Mengaud J, Cleenwerck I, Vanhonacker K, Hoste B, Dawyndt P, Degivry MC, Ringuet D, Janssens D, Swings J (2004) Reclassification of Lactobacillus kefirgranum Takizawa et al. 1994 as Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens subsp. kefirgranum subsp. nov. and emended description of L. kefiranofaciens Fujisawa et al. 1988. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Will TM, Zeh A, Gerdes A, Frimmel HE, Millar IL, Schmadicke E (2009) Palaeoproterozoic to Palaeozoic magmatic and metamorphic events in the Shackleton Range, East Antarctica: constraints from zircon and monazite dating, and implications for the amalgamation of Gondwana. Precambrian Res 172:25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Yoon JH, Lee KC, Weiss N, Kho YH, Kang KH, Park YH (2001) Sporosarcina aquimarina sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from seawater in Korea, and transfer of Bacillus globisporus (Larkin and Stokes 1967), Bacillus psychrophilus (Nakamura 1984) and Bacillus pasteurii (Chester 1898) to the genus Sporosarcina as Sporosarcina globispora comb. nov., Sporosarcina psychrophila comb. nov. and Sporosarcina pasteurii comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Sporosarcina. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1079–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar