The Effects of Endophytes on Seed Production and Seed Predation of Tall Fescue and Meadow Fescue
- 284 Downloads
Fungal endophytes of grasses are often included in agricultural management and in ecological studies of natural grass populations. In European agriculture and ecological studies, however, grass endophytes are largely ignored. In this study, we determined endophyte infection frequencies of 13 European cultivars and 49 wild tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix) populations in Northern Europe. We then examined seed production and seed predation of endophyte-infected (E+) and endophyte-free (E−) tall fescue (in wild grass populations and in a field experiment) and meadow fescue (Schedonorus pratensis; in a field experiment only). Endophytes were detected in only one of the 13 cultivars. In contrast, >90% of wild tall fescue plants harbored endophytes in 45 wild populations but were absent in three inland populations in Estonia. In three wild tall fescue study sites, 17%, 22%, and 56% of the seeds were preyed upon by the cocksfoot moth. Endophyte infection did not affect seed mass of tall fescue in the field experiment. However, seed predation was lower in E+ than E− grasses in the two tall fescue populations with higher predation rates. For meadow fescue, the mean number of seeds from E+ plants was higher than E− plants, but E− and E+ seeds had equal rates of predation by the moth. Our results suggest that the effects of grass endophytes on seed production and cocksfoot moth seed predation vary considerably among grass species, and the effects may depend on herbivore pressure and other environmental conditions.
This study was funded by the Academy of Finland (project no. 110658), Marjatta and Eino Kolli Foundation, Olvi Foundation, and Niemi Foundation.
- 1.Carter DJ (1984) Pest Lepidoptera of Europe. Dr. W. Junk Publications, Boston, p 75Google Scholar
- 4.Clay K (2009) Defensive mutualism and grass endophytes: still valid after all these years? In: Torres M, White JF (eds) Defensive mutualism in microbial symbiosis. Taylor and Francis Publications, London, pp 9–20Google Scholar
- 15.Hämet-Ahti L, Suominen J, Ulvinen T, Uotila P (eds) (1998) Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland, in Finnish), 4th edn. Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland, pp 656Google Scholar
- 16.Knoch TR, Faeth SH, Arnott DL (1993) Endophytic fungi alter foraging and dispersal by desert seed-harvesting ants. Oecologia 95:470–473Google Scholar
- 24.Puentes A, Bazely DR, Huss-Danell K (2007) Endophytic fungi in Festuca pratensis grown in Swedish agricultural grasslands with different managements. Symbiosis 44:121–126Google Scholar
- 26.Rolston MP, Hare MD, Moore KK, Christensen MJ (1986) Viability of Lolium endophyte fungus in seed stored at different moisture conditions and temperatures. NZ J Exp Agric 14:297–300Google Scholar