Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 29–38 | Cite as

An Antarctic Hot Spot for Fungi at Shackleton's Historic Hut on Cape Royds

  • Robert A. BlanchetteEmail author
  • Benjamin W. Held
  • Brett E. Arenz
  • Joel A. Jurgens
  • Nicolas J. Baltes
  • Shona M. Duncan
  • Roberta L. Farrell
Fungal Microbiology

Abstract

The historic expedition huts located in the Ross Sea Region of the Antarctic and the thousands of artifacts left behind by the early explorers represent important cultural heritage from the “Heroic Era” of Polar exploration. The hut at Cape Royds built by Ernest Shackleton and members of the 1907–1908 British Antarctic Expedition has survived the extreme Antarctic environment for over 100 years, but recent studies have shown many forms of deterioration are causing serious problems, and microbial degradation is evident in the historic wood. Conservation work to reduce moisture at the hut required removal of fodder, wood, and many different types of organic materials from the stables area on the north side of the structure allowing large numbers of samples to be obtained for these investigations. In addition, wood from historic food storage boxes exposed in a ravine adjacent to the hut were also sampled. Fungi were cultured on several different media, and pure cultures were obtained and identified by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region of rDNA. From the 69 cultures of filamentous fungi obtained, the most predominant genera were Cadophora (44%) followed by Thielavia (17%) and Geomyces (15%). Other fungi found included Cladosporium, Chaetomium, and isolates identified as being in Pezizomycotina, Onygenales, Nectriaceae, and others. No filamentous basidiomycetes were found. Phylogenetic analyses of the Cadophora species showed great species diversity present revealing Cadophora malorum, Cadophora luteo-olivacea, Cadophora fastigiata, as well as Cadophora sp. 4E71-1, a C. malorum-like species, and Cadophora sp. 7R16-1, a C. fastigiata-like species. Scanning electron microscopy showed extensive decay was present in the wood samples with type 1 and type 2 forms of soft rot evident in pine and birch wood, respectively. Fungi causing decay in the historic wooden structures and artifacts are of great concern, and this investigation provides insight into the identity and species diversity of fungi found at the site. The historic woods and other organic materials at this site represent a large input of carbon into the Antarctic environment. This as well as nutrient additions from the nearby Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) colony and favorable conditions for fungal growth at Cape Royds appear responsible for the significant fungal diversity, and where extensive decay is taking place in wood in contact with the ground.

Keywords

Internal Transcribe Spacer Secondary Cell Wall Wood Decay Gentoo Penguin Pezizomycotina 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Nigel Watson and conservators of the Antarctic Heritage Trust for their support and cooperation during this study, support personnel of Scott Base and McMurdo Station for their assistance in conducting this research in Antarctica, and Antarctica New Zealand and National Science Foundation for logistic support. We also thank David Harrowfield and Adam Wild for their helpful suggestions to the manuscript. This research is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No. 0537143.

References

  1. 1.
    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antarctic Heritage Trust (2003) Conservation report: Shackleton's hut British Antarctic expedition 1907-1909 Cape Royds, Ross Isalnd, Antarctica. Antarctic Heritage Trust, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arenz BE, Blanchette RA (2009) Investigations of fungal diversity in wooden structures and soils at historic sites on the Antarctic Peninsula. Can J Microbiol 55:46–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arenz BE, Held BW, Jurgens JA, Farrell RL, Blanchette RA (2006) Fungal diversity in soils and historic wood from the Ross Sea Region of Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3057–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett JE, Virginia RA, Parson AN, Wall DH (2006) Soil carbon turnover in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3065–3082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blanchette RA (1998) A guide to wood deterioration caused by fungi and insects. In: Dardes K, Rothe A (eds) The conservation of panel paintings. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp 55–68Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanchette RA (2000) A review of microbial deterioration found in archaeological wood from different environments. Int Biodet Biodegrad 46:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blanchette RA (2003) Deterioration in historic and archaeological woods from terrestrial sites. In: Koestler RJ, Koestler VR, Charola AE, Nieto-Fernandez FE (eds) Art, biology, and conservation: biodeterioration of works of art. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, pp 328–347Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blanchette RA, Held BW, Jurgens JA (2008) Northumberland House, Fort Conger and the Peary Huts in the Canadian High Arctic: current condition and assessment of wood deterioration taking place. In: Barr S, Chaplin P (ed) Historical Polar bases preservation and management. ICOMOS Monuments and Sites No.XVII. International Polar Heritage Committee, Oslo, pp 30–37Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blanchette RA, Held BW, Jurgens JA, McNew DL, Harrington TC, Duncan S, Farrell RL (2004) Wood destroying soft-rot fungi in the historic expeditions huts of Antarctica. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1328–1335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bridge PD, Spooner BM, Roberts PJ (2008) Non-lichenized fungi from the Antarctic region. Mycotaxon 106:485–490Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Connell L, Redman R, Craig S, Rodriguez R (2006) Distribution and abundance of fungi in the soils of Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3083–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daniel G, Nilsson T (1998) Developments in the study of soft rot and bacterial decay. In: Bruce A, Palfreyman JW (eds) Forest Products Biotechnology. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 37–62Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duncan SM, Minasaki R, Farrell RL, Thaites JM, Held BW, Arenz BE, Jurgens JA, Blanchette RA (2008) Screening fungi isolated from historic Discovery Hut on Ross Island, Antarctica for cellulose degradation. Ant Sci 20:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Durand H, Soucaille P, Tiraby G (1984) Comparative study of cellulases and hemicellulases from four fungi: mesophiles Trichoderma reesei and Penicillium sp. and thermophiles Thielavia terrestris and Sporotrichum cellulophilum. Enzyme Microb Technol 6:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eaton RA, Hale MD (1993) Wood: decay, pests and protection. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eriksson K, Blanchette RA, Ander P (1990) Microbial and enzymatic degradation of wood and wood components. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Filley TR, Blanchette RA, Simpson E, Fogel M (2001) Nitrogen cycling by unique wood decay fungi in the King Midas tomb, Gordion, Turkey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13346–13350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrowfield DL (1995) Icy heritage: historic sites of the Ross Sea Region. Antarctic Heritage Trust, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Held BW, Jurgens JA, Arenz BE, Duncan SM, Farrell RL, Blanchette RA (2005) Environmental factors influencing microbial growth inside the historic expedition huts of Ross Island, Antarctica. Int Biodet Biodegrad 55:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Held BW, Jurgens JA, Duncan SM, Farrell RL, Blanchette RA (2006) Assessment of fungal diversity and deterioration in a wooden structure at New Harbor, Antarctica. Polar Biol 29:526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jurgens JA, Blanchette RA, Filley TR (2009) Fungal diversity and deterioration in mummified woods from the ad Astra Ice Cap region in the Canadian High Arctic. Polar Biol 32:751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ludley KE, Robinson CH (2008) ‘Decomposer’ basidiomycota in arctic and Antarctic ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 40:11–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malosso E, Waite IS, English L, Hopkins DW, O'Donnell G (2006) Fungal diversity in maritime Antarctic soils determined using a combination of culture isolation, molecular fingerprinting and cloning techniques. Polar Biol 29:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marshall WA (1998) Aerial transport of keratinaceous substrate and distribution of the fungus Geomyces pannorum in Antarctic soils. Microb Ecol 36:212–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mercantini R, Marsella R, Cervellati MC (1989) Keratinophilic fungi isolated from Antarctic soil. Mycopathologia 106:47–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Möller C, Dreyfuss MM (1996) Microfungi from Antarctic lichens, mosses and vascular plants. Mycologia 88:922–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nilsson T (1973) Studies on wood degradation and cellulolytic activity of microfungi. Stud For Suec Nr 104Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    National Academy of Sciences Report NRC (National Research Council) (2003) Frontiers in Polar Biology in the Genomic Era. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robinson CH (2001) Cold adaptation in Arctic and Antarctic fungi. New Phytol 151:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rodrigues DF, Tiedje JM (2008) Coping with our cold planet. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1677–1686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stchigel AM, Guarro J, Mac Cormak W (2003) Apiosordaria antarctica and Thielavia antarctica, two new ascomycetes from Antarctica. Mycologia 95:1218–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analyses using parsimony (*and other methods) version 4.0b10a. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tosi S, Casado B, Gerdol R, Caretta G (2002) Fungi isolated from Antarctic mosses. Polar Biol 25:262–268Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tosi S, Onofri S, Brusoni M, Zucconi L, Vishniac H (2005) Response of Antarctic soil fungal assemblages to experimental warming and reduction of UV radiation. Polar Biol 28:470–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wall DH (2005) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial habitats of Antarctica. Ant Sci 17:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Worrall JJ, Anagnost SE, Wang CJK (1991) Conditions for soft rot of wood. Can J Microbiol 37:869–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zabel RA, Morrell JJ (1992) Wood microbiology. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Blanchette
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benjamin W. Held
    • 1
  • Brett E. Arenz
    • 1
  • Joel A. Jurgens
    • 1
  • Nicolas J. Baltes
    • 1
    • 3
  • Shona M. Duncan
    • 2
    • 4
  • Roberta L. Farrell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations