Microbial Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 827–842 | Cite as

Linking Microbial Community Structure and Function to Seasonal Differences in Soil Moisture and Temperature in a Chihuahuan Desert Grassland

  • Colin W. Bell
  • Veronica Acosta-Martinez
  • Nancy E. McIntyre
  • Stephen Cox
  • David T. Tissue
  • John C. Zak
Soil Microbiology


Global and regional climate models predict higher air temperature and less frequent, but larger precipitation events in arid regions within the next century. While many studies have addressed the impact of variable climate in arid ecosystems on plant growth and physiological responses, fewer studies have addressed soil microbial community responses to seasonal shifts in precipitation and temperature in arid ecosystems. This study examined the impact of a wet (2004), average (2005), and dry (2006) year on subsequent responses of soil microbial community structure, function, and linkages, as well as soil edaphic and nutrient characteristics in a mid-elevation desert grassland in the Chihuahuan Desert. Microbial community structure was classified as bacterial (Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and actinomycetes) and fungal (saprophytic fungi and arbuscular mycorrhiza) categories using (fatty acid methyl ester) techniques. Carbon substrate use and enzymic activity was used to characterize microbial community function annually and seasonally (summer and winter). The relationship between saprophytic fungal community structure and function remained consistent across season independent of the magnitude or frequency of precipitation within any given year. Carbon utilization by fungi in the cooler winter exceeded use in the warmer summer each year suggesting that soil temperature, rather than soil moisture, strongly influenced fungal carbon use and structure and function dynamics. The structure/function relationship for AM fungi and soil bacteria notably changed across season. Moreover, the abundance of Gram-positive bacteria was lower in the winter compared to Gram-negative bacteria. Bacterial carbon use, however, was highest in the summer and lower during the winter. Enzyme activities did not respond to either annual or seasonal differences in the magnitude or timing of precipitation. Specific structural components of the soil microbiota community became uncoupled from total microbial function during different seasons. This change in the microbial structure/function relationship suggests that different components of the soil microbial community may provide similar ecosystem function, but differ in response to seasonal temperature and precipitation. As soil microbes encounter increased soil temperatures and altered precipitation amounts and timing that are predicted for this region, the ability of the soil microbial community to maintain functional resilience across the year may be reduced in this Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem.


  1. 1.
    Bernstein L, et al (2007) An assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Valencia, Spain, p 52 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stanley EH, Valett HM (1992) Interactions between drying and the hyporheic zone of a desert stream, in global climate change and freshwater ecosystems. Springer, New York, NY, p 211-233Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NAST, N.A.S.T., US Global Change Research Program (2000) Climate change impacts on the united states: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johns TC et al (1996) The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation. Clim Dyn 13:103–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seager R et al (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Easterling DR et al (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 4:25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rapport DJ, Whitford WG (1999) How ecosystems respond to stress. BioScience 49(3):193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR (2001) Water use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems. J Ecol 89:464–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cable JM, Huxman TE (2004) Precipitation pulse size effects on Sonoran Desert soil microbial crusts. Oecologia 141:317–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belnap J et al (2005) Linkages between microbial and hydrologic processes in arid and semiarid watersheds. Ecology 86(2):298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mooney HA, Canadell J, Chapin FS, Ehleringer JR, and Korner C (2000) Ecosystem physiology responses to global change. Pages 141-189 in B. H. Walker, W. Steffen, J. Canadell, and J. Ingram, editors. The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huxman TE et al (2004) Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429:651–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Groffman PM, Bohlen PJ (1999) Soil and sediment biodiversity: cross-system comparisons and large scale effects. BioScience 49:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zak JC, Sinsabaugh R, MacKay W (1995) Windows of opportunity in desert ecosystems: their implications to fungal community development. Can J Bot 73:S1407–S1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75(1):2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tilman D et al (2001) Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Symstad AJ et al (2003) Long-term and large-scale perspectives on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Bioscience 53:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zak DR et al (2003) Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84(8):2042–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Belnap J, Phillips SL, Miller ME (2004) Response of desert biological soil crusts to alterations in precipitation frequency. Oecologia 141:306–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vishnevetsky S, Steinberger Y (1997) Bacterial and fungal dynamics and their contribution to microbial biomass in desert soil. J Arid Environ 37:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Collins SL et al (2008) Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in aridland ecosystems. J Ecol 96:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Behan-Pelleteir VM, Newton G (1999) Linking soil biodiversity and ecosystem function—the taxonomic dilemma. BioScience 49(2):149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Groffman PM, Zaady E, Shachak M (2005) Microbial contributors to biodiversity in deserts. In: Perevolotsky A (ed) Biodiversity in drylands. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 109–121Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zak JC et al (1994) Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biol Biochem 26(9):1101–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parker LW et al (1984) Carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the decomposition of litter and roots of a Chihuahuan desert annual, Lepidium lasiocarpum. Ecol Monogr 54:339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schlesinger WH, Fonteyn PJ, Marion GM (1987) Soil moisture content and plant transpiration in the Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico. J Arid Environ 12:119–126Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peterjohn WT (1991) Denitrification: enzyme content and activity in desert soils. Soil Biol Biochem 23:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fliesbach A, Sarig S, Steinberger Y (1994) Effects of water pulses and climatic conditions on microbial biomass kinetics and microbial activity in a Yermosol of the central Negev. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 8:353–362Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steinberger Y et al (1999) Phospholipid fatty acid profiles as indicators for microbial community structure in soils along a climatic transect in the Judean Desert. Biol Fertil Soils 28:292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zaady E, Groffman PM, Shachak M (1996) Release and consumption of nitrogen from snail feces in Negev Desert soils. Biol Fertil Soils 23:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zaady E, Groffman PM, Shachak M (1996) Litter as a regulator of nitrogen and carbon dynamics in macrophytic patches in Negev Desert soils. Soil Biol Biochem 28:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kennedy AC, Gewin VL (1997) Soil microbial diversity: present and future. Soil Sci 162:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zak JC, Visser S (1996) An appraisal of soil fungal biodiversity: the crossroads between taxonomic and functional biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 5:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sobek E, Zak JC (2003) The soil FungiLog procedure: method and analytical approaches toward understanding fungal functional diversity. Mycologia 95:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Konopka A, Oliver L, Turco RF (1998) The use of carbon substrate utilization patterns in environmental and ecological microbiology. Microb Ecol 35:103–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Smalla K et al (1998) Analysis of Biolog GN substrate utilization patterns by microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1220–1225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bell CW et al (2008) Soil microbial responses to temporal variations of moisture and temperature in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Microb Ecol 56(1):153–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Trasar-Cepeda C, Leiros MC, Gil-Sotres F (2000) Biochemical properties of acid soils under climax vegetation (Atlantic oakwood) in an area of the European temperate-humid zone (Galicia, NW Spain): specific parameters. Soil Biol Biochem 32:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ndiaye EL et al (2000) Integrative biological indicators for detecting change in soil quality. Am J Altern Agric 15:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Klose S, Moore JM, Tabatabai MA (1999) Arylsulfatase activity of microbial biomass in soils as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 29:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moore JM, Klose S, Tabatabai MA (2000) Soil Microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 31:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pavel R, Doyle J, Steinberger Y (2003) Seasonal patterns of cellulose concentration in desert soil. Soil Biol Biochem 36:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh R (1999) Simulated patterns of little decay predict patterns of extracellular enzyme activities. Appl Soil Ecol 14:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kieft TL et al (1997) Survival and phospholipids fatty acid profiles of surface and subsurface bacteria in nature sediment microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1531–1542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2003) Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biol Biochem 35:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zak JC et al (1997) Big Bend National Park watershed program monitoring microbial activity and diversity along an elevational gradient. In 9th Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands. Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Robertson TR et al (2008) Precipitation timing and magnitude differentially affect aboveground annual net primary productivity in three perennial species in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. New Phytol 181(1):230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Patrick L et al (2009) Physiological responses of two contrasting desert plant species to precipitation variability are differentially regulated by soil moisture and nitrogen dynamics. Glob Chang Biol 15(5):1214–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jarrell WM et al (1999) Soil water and temperature status. In: Sollins P (ed) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 55–73Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Onset CC (2004) Hobo-H8 pro-series user’s manual. Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Robertson GP et al (1999) Soil carbon and nitrogen availability: nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and soil respiration potentials. In: Sollins P (ed) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 258–271Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sollins P et al (1999) Soil carbon and nitrogen. In: Sollins P (ed) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 89–105Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. Academic, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nunan N, Morgan MA, Herlihy M (1997) Ultraviolet absorbance (280 nm) of compounds released from soil during chloroform fumigation as an estimate of the microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 30(12):1599–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Garland JL, Millis AL (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2351–2359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dobranic JK, Zak JC (1999) A microtiter plate procedure for evaluating fungal functional diversity. Mycologia 91:756–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Parham JA, Deng SP (2000) Detection, quantification and characterization of B-glucosaminidase activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1183–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Keeney DR (ed) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, pp 903–947Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Deacon J (2006) Fungal nutrition. In: Deacon J (ed) Fungal biology, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ekenler M, Tabatabai MA (2002) β-Glucosaminidase activity of soils: effect of cropping systems and its relationship to nitrogen mineralization. Biol Fertil Soils 35:1081–1094Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Acosta-Martinez V, Zobek TM, Gill TE (2003) Enzyme activities and microbial community structure in semiarid agricultural soils. Biol Fertil Soils 38:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sasser M (2001) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI, Inc. Automated Microbial Identification Solutions, Newark, DEGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zak DR et al (1996) Soil microbial communities beneath Populus grandidentata grown under elevated atmospheric CO2. Ecol Appl 6:257–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zogg GP et al (1997) Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming. Soil Sci Soc Am 61:475–481Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ringelberg DB et al (1997) Consequences of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels for the belowground microbiota associated with white oak. J Environ Qual 26:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Pinkart HC et al (2002) Biochemical approaches to biomass measurements and community structure analysis. In: Hurst CJ (ed) Manual of environmental microbiology. ASM, Washington, DC, pp 101–113Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zelles L (1997) Phospholipid fatty acid profiles in selected members of soil microbial communities. Chemosphere 35:275–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Madan R et al (2002) Use of fatty acids for identification of AM fungi and estimation of the biomass of AM spores in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 34:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Olsson PA (1999) Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ruess L et al (2002) Fatty acids of fungi and nematodes-possible biomarkers in the soil food chain? Soil Biol Biochem 34:745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rateledge C, Wilkinson SG (1998) Microbial lipids. Academic, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bardgett RD, Hobbs PJ, Frostegard A (1996) Changes in soil fungal:bacterial biomass ratios following reductions in the intensity of management of an upland grassland. Biol Fertil Soils 22:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Frostegard A, Baath E (1996) The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 22:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Koppenstedt RM. The prokaryotes. Springer, New York, NY, p 1139–1156Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    White DC, Stair JO, Ringelberg DB (1996) Quantitative comparisons or in situ microbial biodiversity by signature biomarker analysis. J Ind Microbiol 17:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Leps J, Smilauer P (2003) Mulitvariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Vandenkoornhuyse P et al (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition associated with two plant species in a grassland ecosystem. Mol Ecol 11:1555–1564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Treseder KK, Cross A (2006) Global distributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecosystems 9:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Deacon J (2006) Fungal symbiosis. In: Deacon J (ed) Fungal biology, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 279–308Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Rillig MC (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett 7:740–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Freise CF, Allen MF (1991) The spread of VA mycorrhizal fungal hyphae in the soil: inoculum types and external hyphal architecture. Mycologia 83:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cui M, Caldwell M (1997) A large ephemeral release of nitrogen upon wetting of dry soil and corresponding root responses in the field. Plant Soil 191:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Brown AR, Webster S (2004) Orographic flow-blocking scheme characteristics. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:3015–3028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sinsabaugh R et al (1999) Characterizing soil microbial communities. In: Sollins P (ed) Standard soil methods for long term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizosphere—a critical review. Plant Soil 205:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bolton H Jr, Fredrickson JK (1993) Microbial ecology in the rhizosphere. In: Metting FB Jr (ed) Soil microbial ecology. NY, Marcel Decker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Oren A, Steinberger Y (2008) Catabolic profiles of soil fungal communities along a geographic climate gradient in Israel. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2578–2587CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin W. Bell
    • 1
  • Veronica Acosta-Martinez
    • 2
  • Nancy E. McIntyre
    • 1
  • Stephen Cox
    • 3
  • David T. Tissue
    • 1
    • 4
  • John C. Zak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Wind Erosion and Water Conservation UnitUSDALubbockUSA
  3. 3.The Institute for Environment and Human HealthTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  4. 4.Centre for Plant and Food ScienceUniversity of Western SydneyRichmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations