Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 36–46 | Cite as

Inter-specific Interactions Between Carbon-limited Soil Bacteria Affect Behavior and Gene Expression

  • Paolina GarbevaEmail author
  • Wietse de Boer
Soil Microbiology

Abstract

Recent publications indicate that inter-specific interactions between soil bacteria may strongly affect the behavior of the strains involved, e.g., by increased production of antibiotics or extracellular enzymes. This may point at an enhanced competitive ability due to inter-specific triggering of gene expression. However, it is not known if such inter-specific interactions also occur during competition for carbon which is the normal situation in soil. Here, we report on competitive interactions between two taxonomically non-related bacterial strains, Pseudomonas sp. A21 and Pedobacter sp. V48, that were isolated from a dune soil. The strains showed strong effects on each other’s behavior and gene expression patterns when growing together under carbon-limited conditions on agar. The most pronounced observed visual changes in mixed cultures as compared to monocultures were (1) strong inhibition of a bioindicator fungus, suggesting the production of a broad-spectrum antibiotic, and (2) the occurrence of gliding-like movement of Pedobacter cells. Two independent techniques, namely random arbitrary primed-PCR (RAP-PCR) and suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH), identified in total 24 genes that had higher expression in mixed cultures compared to monocultures. Microbial interactions were clearly bidirectional, as differentially expressed genes were detected for both bacteria in mixed cultures. Sequence analysis of the differentially expressed genes indicated that several of them were most related to genes involved in motility and chemotaxis, secondary metabolite production and two-component signal transduction systems. The gene expression patterns suggest an interference competition strategy by the Pseudomonas strain and an escape/explorative strategy by the Pedobacter strain during confrontation with each other. Our results show that the bacterial strains can distinguish between intra- and inter-specific carbon competition.

Keywords

Pseudomonas Mixed Culture Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization Pedobacter Dune Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific research (NWO). The authors thank Wiecher Smant for ergosterol determination and Adam Ostrowski for his help in Q-PCR analysis. This is publication No. 4440 NIOO-KNAW of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology.

References

  1. 1.
    An D, Danhorn T, Fuqua C, Parsek MR (2006) Quorum sending and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures. PNAS 103:3832–3833Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angell S, Bench BJ, Williams H, Watanave CMH (2006) Pyocyanin isolated from a marine microbial population: synergistic production between two distinct bacterial species and mode of action. Chem Biol 13:1349–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bassler BL (1999) How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:582–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belas R, Zhulin IB, Yang Z (2008) Bacterial signaling and motility: sure bets. J Bacteriol 190:1849–1856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bidle KL, Bartlett DH (2001) RNA arbitrarily primed PCR survey of genes regulated by TocR in the deep-sea bacterium Phytobacterium profundum Strain SS9. J Bacteriol 183:1688–1693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bogush ML et al (1999) Identification and localization of differences between Echerichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium genome by suppressive subtractive hybridization. Mol Gen Genet 262:721–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakraborty A, Das S, Majumdar S, Mukhopadhyay K, Roychoudhury S, Chaudhri K (2000) Use of RNA arbitrarily primed- PCR fingerprinting to identify Vibrio cholerae genes differentially expressed in the host following infection. Infect Immun 68:3837–3887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang IS, Ballard JD, Krumholz LR (2003) Evidence for chimeric sequences formed during random arbitrarily primed PCR. J Microbiol Methods 54:427–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chia J-S, Lee Y-Y, Huang P-T, Chen J-Y (2001) Identification of stress-responsive genes in Streptococcus mutans by differential display reverse transcription-PCR. Infect Immun 69:2493–2501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Boer W, Verheggen P, Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA (2003) Microbial community composition affects soil fungistasis. Appl Environm Microbiol 69:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Boer W, Wagenaar A, Gunnewiek PJA, van Veen JA (2007) In vitro suppression of fungi caused by combinations of apparently non-antagonistic soil bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:177–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demoling F, Figueroa D, Bååth E (2007) Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2485–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diatchenko L et al (1996) Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. PNAS 93:6025–6030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diatchenko L, Chenchi A, Siebert P (1998) Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating subtracted cDNA libraries starting from poly (A) or total RNA. In: Siebert P, Larrik J (eds) RT-PCR methods for gene cloning and analysis. BioTechniques Books, MA, pp 213–239Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubuis C, Haas D (2007) Cross-species GacA-controlled induction of antibiosis in Pseudomonas. Appl Environm Microbiol 73:650–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubuis C, Keel C, Haas D (2007) Dialogues of root-colonizing biocontrol pseudomonads. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:311–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dutta R, Qin L, Inouye M (1999) Histidine kinase: diversity of domain organization. Molec Microbiol 34:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frias-Lopez J, Bonheyo GT, Fouke BW (2004) Identification of differential gens expression in bacteria associated with coral black band disease by using RNA-Arbitrarily primed PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3687–3694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fong KP, Chung WO, Lamont RJ, Demunth DR (2001) Intra-and interspecies regulation of gene expression by actinobacillus actinomycetomcomitans LuxS. Infection Immunity 69:7625–7634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrison F, Paul J, Massey RC, Buckling A (2008) Interspecific competition and siderophore-mediated cooperation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME Journal 2:49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harschey RM (2003) Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:249–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heeb S, Blumer C, Haas D (2002) A regulatory RNA as a mediator in GacA/RsmA-dependent global control of exoproduct formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. J Bacteriol 184:1046–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holmsrom K, Gram L (2003) Elucidation of the Vibrio anguillarum genetic response to the potential fish probiont Pseudomonas fluorescens AH2 using RAP-arbitrarily primed PCR. J Bacteriol 185:831–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kanagasabhapathy M, Nagata S (2008) Cross-species induction of antibacterial activity produced by epibiotic bacteria isolated from Indian marine sponge Pseudoceratina purpurea. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:687–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kill K, Ferchaud JP, David C, Binnewies TT, Wu H et al (2005) Genome update: distribution of two-component transduction system in 250 bacterial genomes. Microbiology 151:3447–3452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim J-D, Kim B, Lee C-G (2007) Alga-lytic activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens against red tide causing marine alga Heterosigma akashiwo. Biol Control 41:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khorchid A, Ikura M (2005) Bacterial histidine kinase as signal sensor and transducer. Inter IJBCB 38:307–312Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lang AS, Beatty JT (2002) A bacterial signal transduction system controls genetic exchange and motility. J Bacteriol 184:913–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li S, Xiao X, Li J, Luo J, Wang F (2006) Identification of genes regulated by changing salinity in the deep-sea bacterium Shewanella sp. WP3 using RNA arbitrarily primed PCR. Extremophiles 10:97–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meunier L, Prefontainen G, Van Munster M, Brousseau R, Masson L (2006) Transcriptional response of Choristoneura fumiferana to sublethal exposure of Cry1Ab protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Molec Biol 15:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nagel A, Fleming JT, Sayler GS (1999) Reduction of false positives in prokaryotic mRNA differential display. BioTechniques 26:641–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nguyen B, Bowers RM, Wahlund TM, Read BA (2005) Suppressive subtractive hybridization of and differences in gene expression content of calcifying and noncalcifying cultures of Emiliana huxleyi strain 1516. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2564–2575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oliva AA, Swann JW (2001) Increased yield of PCR products by addition of T4 gene 32 protein to the SMART tm PCR cDNA synthesis system. BioTechniques 31:81–86Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parret AHA, de Mot R (2002) Escherichia coli's uropathogenic-specific protein: a bacteriocin promoting infectivity. Microbiology 148:1604–1606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rao D, Webb JS, Kjellberg S (2005) Competitive interactions in mixed-species biofilm containing the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicate. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1729–1736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rebrikov DV, Britanova OV, Gurskaya NG, Lukyanova KA, Tarabykin VS, Vukyanov SA (2000) Mirror orientation selection (MOS): a method for elimination false positive clones from libraries generated by suppression subtractive hybridization. Nucleic Acid Res 28:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Riedel K, Hentzer M, Geisenberger O, Huber B, Steidle A, Wu H, Holby N, Givskov M, Molin S, Eberl L (2001) N-Acylchomoserine-lactone-mediated communication between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia in mixed biofilms. Microbiology 147:3249–3262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saunders NFW, Goodchild A, Reftry M, Guilhaus M, Curmi PMG, Cavicchioli R (2005) Predicted roles for hypothetical proteins in the low-temperature expressed proteome of Antarctic archeon. J Proteome Research 4:464–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shepard BD, Gilmore MS (1999) Identification of aerobically and anaerobically induced genes in Enterococcus faecalis by random arbitrarily primed PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1470–1476Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Taga ME, Bassler BL (2003) Chemical communication among bacteria. PNAS 100:14549–14554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Varga A, Jame D (2006) Real-time PCR and SYBR Green I melting curve analysis for identification of Plum pox virus strain C, EA and W: effect of amplicon size melt rate, and dye translocation. J Virol Methods 132:146–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Williams P (2007) Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiol 153:3923–3938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Winstanley C (2002) Spot the difference: application of subtractive hybridization to the study of bacterial pathogens. J Med Microbiol 51:459–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang Q, Melcher U, Zhou L, Najar FZ, Roe BA, Fletcher J (2005) Genomic comparison of plant pathogenic and nonpathogenic Serratia marcesens strain by suppressive subtractive hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7716–7723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)Center for Terrestrial EcologyHeterenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.HeterenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations