Microbial Ecology

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 640–648 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Airborne Bacterial Population in the Periodically Confined Antarctic Base Concordia

  • Rob Van Houdt
  • Patrick De Boever
  • Ilse Coninx
  • Claire Le Calvez
  • Roberto Dicasillati
  • Jacques Mahillon
  • Max Mergeay
  • Natalie Leys
Original Article


The environmental airborne bacterial population in relation to human confinement was investigated over a period of 1 year in the Concordia Research Station, which is located on the Eastern Antarctic plateau. The unique location of the station makes it suitable for different research domains such as glaciology, atmospheric sciences, astronomy, etc. Furthermore, it is used as a test bed for long-duration spaceflights to study the physiologic and psychological adaptation to isolated environments. A total of 96 samples were collected at eight different locations in the station at regular intervals. The airborne bacterial contamination was for 90% of the samples lower than 10.0 × 102 colony-forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU/m3) and the total bacterial contamination increased over time during confinement but diminished after re-opening of the base. Viable airborne bacteria with different morphology were identified by biochemical analyses. The predominant microflora was identified as Staphylococcus sp. (24.9% of total) and Bacillus sp. (11.6% of total) and was associated with human activity, but also environmental species such as Sphingomonas paucimobilis (belonging to the α-Proteobacteria) could establish themselves in the airborne population. A few opportunistic pathogens (6%) were also identified.


International Space Station Sphingomonas Crew Member Airborne Bacterium Closed Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was financially supported by the European Space Agency (ESA-PRODEX) and the Belgian Science Policy (Belspo) through the MISSEX project (PRODEX agreements no. C90254). We are grateful to the MISSEX partners and to C. Lasseur, C. Paillé, and B. Lamaze from ESTEC/ESA for their constant support and advice; and to IPEV and PNRA for logistics.


  1. 1.
    Aislabie J, Foght J, Saul D (2000) Aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from soil near Scott Base, Antarctica. Polar Biol 23:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersson AM, Weiss N, Rainey F, Salkinoja-Salonen MS (1999) Dust-borne bacteria in animal sheds, schools and children’s day care centres. J Appl Microbiol 86:622–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASHRAE (2007) Standard 62.1-2007—ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. ASHRAE, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASHRAE (1984) Standard 55-1981—thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ASHRAE, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Augustowska M, Dutkiewicz J (2006) Variability of airborne microflora in a hospital ward within a period of one year. Ann Agric Environ Med 13:99–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker J, Jones MV (2005) The potential spread of infection caused by aerosol contamination of surfaces after flushing a domestic toilet. J Appl Microbiol 99:339–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beaugerie L, Petit JC (2004) Microbial–gut interactions in health and disease. Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:337–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berg G (2000) Diversity of antifungal and plant-associated Serratia plymuthica strains. J Appl Microbiol 88:952–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouillard L, Michel O, Dramaix M, Devleeschouwer M (2005) Bacterial contamination of indoor air, surfaces, and settled dust, and related dust endotoxin concentrations in healthy office buildings. Ann Agric Environ Med 12:187–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouillard LA, Devleeschouwer MJ, Michel O (2006) Characteristics of the home bacterial contamination and endotoxin related release. J Pharm Belg 61:63–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brief RS, Bernath T (1988) Indoor pollution: guidelines for prevention and control of microbiological respiratory hazards associated with air conditioning and ventilation system. Appl Ind Hyg 3:5–10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busse HJ, Denner EB, Buczolits S, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Bennasar A, Kämpfer P (2003) Sphingomonas aurantiaca sp. nov., Sphingomonas aerolata sp. nov. and Sphingomonas faeni sp. nov., air- and dustborne and Antarctic, orange-pigmented, psychrotolerant bacteria, and emended description of the genus Sphingomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1253–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Castro VA, Thrasher AN, Healy M, Ott CM, Pierson DL (2004) Microbial characterization during the early habitation of the International Space Station. Microb Ecol 47:119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chi MC, Li CS (2006) Analysis of bioaerosols from chicken houses by culture and non-culture method. Aerosol Sci Technol 40:1071–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chiller K, Selkin BA, Murakawa GJ (2001) Skin microflora and bacterial infections of the skin. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 6:170–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christner BC, Mosley-Thompson E, Thompson LG, Zagorodnov V, Sandman K, Reeve JN (2000) Recovery and identification of viable bacteria immured in glacial ice. Icarus 144:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox CS (1995) Stability of airborne microbes and allergens. In: Cox CS, Wathes CM (eds) Bioaerosols handbook. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 77–99Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dacarro C, Picco AM, Grisoli P, Rodolfi M (2003) Determination of aerial microbiological contamination in scholastic sports environments. J Appl Microbiol 95:904–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frank DN, Spiegelman GB, Davis W, Wagner E, Lyons E, Pace NR (2003) Culture-independent molecular analysis of microbial constituents of the healthy human outer ear. J Clin Microbiol 41:295–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gorny RL, Dutkiewicz J (2002) Bacterial and fungal aerosols in indoor environment in Central and Eastern European countries. Ann Agric Environ Med 9:17–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hsueh PR, Teng LJ, Yang PC, Chen YC, Pan HJ, Ho SW, Luh KT (1998) Nosocomial infections caused by Sphingomonas paucimobilis: clinical features and microbiological characteristics. Clin Infect Dis 26:676–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li CS, Lin YC (2001) Storage effects on bacterial concentration: determination of impinger and filter samples. Sci Total Environ 278:231–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lugg DJ (2005) Behavioral health in Antarctica: implications for long-duration space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 76:B74–B77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Metha SK, Bell-Robinson DM, Groves TO, Stetzenbach LD, Pierson DL (2000) Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria. AIHAJ 61:850–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morawska L (2006) Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection? Indoor Air 16:335–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myers DN, Stoeckel DM, Bushon RN, Francy DS, Brady AMG (2007) U.S. Geological Survey, variously dated, Biological indicators: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A7, accessed 26 March 2008, from
  27. 27.
    Novikova N, De Boever P, Poddubko S, Deshevaya E, Polikarpov N, Rakova N, Coninx I, Mergeay M (2006) Survey of environmental biocontamination on board the International Space Station. Res Microbiol 157:5–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Novikova ND (2004) Review of the knowledge of microbial contamination of the Russian manned spacecraft. Microb Ecol 47:127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ofungwu J (2005) Indoor air quality investigation and health risk assessment at correctional institutions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:135–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Palinkas LA (2003) The psychology of isolated and confined environments. Understanding human behavior in Antarctica. Am Psychol 58:353–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sessa R, Di PM, Schiavoni G, Santino I, Altieri A, Pinelli S, Del PM (2002) Microbiological indoor air quality in healthy buildings. New Microbiol 25:51–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stuster J (2005) Analogue prototypes for Lunar and Mars exploration. Aviat Space Environ Med 76:B78–B83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Szczerba I (2003) Occurrence and number of bacteria from the Micrococcus, Kocuria, Nesterenkonia, Kytococcus and Dermacoccus genera on skin and mucous membranes in humans. Med Dosw Mikrobiol 55:67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Houdt R, Givskov M, Michiels CW (2007) Quorum sensing in Serratia. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:407–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Viktorov AN, Novikova ND, Polikarpov NA, Gorshkova VP, Konstantinova SV (1995) Current problems of microbial safety of the interior environment of orbital stations after extended period of operation. Aviakosm Ekolog Med 29:51–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walter AD, Mertsch O, Koehler C, Adamzig H, Hausdorf L, Klocke M, Froehling A, Klocke S, Schlueter O, Schondelmaier D, Loechel B (2007) Contamination control of agricultural products by on-chip PCR and flow cytometry. 12th International Commercialization of Micro and Nano Systems Conference, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yao M, Mainelis G (2007) Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols. J Occup Environ Hyg 4:514–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Van Houdt
    • 1
  • Patrick De Boever
    • 1
  • Ilse Coninx
    • 1
  • Claire Le Calvez
    • 2
  • Roberto Dicasillati
    • 3
  • Jacques Mahillon
    • 4
  • Max Mergeay
    • 1
  • Natalie Leys
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular BiologyBelgian Nuclear Research CentreMolBelgium
  2. 2.French Polar Institute Paul Emile Victor (IPEV)PlouzanéFrance
  3. 3.Programma Nazionale di Ricerche in Antartide (PNRA)RomaItaly
  4. 4.Laboratory of Food and Environmental MicrobiologyUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations