Quantifying Expression of a Dissimilatory (bi)Sulfite Reductase Gene in Petroleum-Contaminated Marine Harbor Sediments
- 400 Downloads
The possibility of quantifying in situ levels of transcripts for dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase (dsr) genes to track the activity of sulfate-reducing microorganisms in petroleum-contaminated marine harbor sediments was evaluated. Phylogenetic analysis of the cDNA generated from mRNA for a ca. 1.4 kbp portion of the contiguous dsrA and dsrB genes suggested that Desulfosarcina species, closely related to cultures known to anaerobically oxidize aromatic hydrocarbons, were active sulfate reducers in the sediments. The levels of dsrA transcripts (per μg total mRNA) were quantified in sediments incubated anaerobically at the in situ temperature as well as in sediments incubated at higher temperatures and/or with added acetate to increase the rate of sulfate reduction. Levels of dsrA transcripts were low when there was no sulfate reduction because the sediments were depleted of sulfate or if sulfate reduction was inhibited with added molybdate. There was a direct correlation between dsrA transcript levels and rates of sulfate reduction when sulfate was at ca. 10 mM in the various sediment treatments, but it was also apparent that within a given sediment, dsrA levels increased over time as long as sulfate was available, even when sulfate reduction rates did not increase. These results suggest that phylogenetic analysis of dsr transcript sequences may provide insight into the active sulfate reducers in marine sediments and that quantifying levels of dsrA transcripts can indicate whether sulfate reducers are active in particular sediment. Furthermore, it may only be possible to use dsrA transcript levels to compare the relative rates of sulfate reduction in sediments when sulfate concentrations, and possibly other environmental conditions, are comparable.
KeywordsSulfate Reduction Clone Library Sulfate Reduction Rate Harbor Sediment Sediment Slurry
This research was funded by the Office of Naval Research (Grant N00014-03-1-0315). We would like to thank Captain Peter Edwards of the University of Massachusetts, Boston and Richard Glaven for their assistance with the sampling in Boston Harbor, MA.
- 8.Darby D (1989) Everett, former Eastern Gas and Fuel, Market Street Site Inspection Report. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Holmes DE, Nevin KP, O’Neil RA, Ward JE, Adams LA, Woodward TL, Vrionis HA, Lovley DR (2005) Potential for quantifying expression of the Geobacteraceae citrate synthase gene to assess the activity of Geobacteraceae in the subsurface and on current-harvesting electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6870–6877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Oremland RS, Capone DG (1988) Use of “specific inhibitors” in biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Adv Microb Ecol 10:285–383Google Scholar
- 35.Stahl DA, Amann R (1991) Development and application of nucleic acid probes. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, pp 205–248Google Scholar
- 37.Voordouw G, Armstrong SM, Reimer MF, Fouts B, Telang AJ, Shen Y, Gevertz D (1996) Characterization of 16S rRNA genes from oil field microbial communities indicates the presence of a variety of sulfate-reducing, fermentative, and sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1623–1629PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Widdel F (1980) Anaerober Abbau von Fettsäuren und Benzoesäure durch neu isolierte Arten Sulfat-reduzierender Bakterien. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar